journal article·2022-01-18Open access

Latent Dimensions of Auto-Encoder as Robust Features for Inter-Conditional Bearing Fault Diagnosis

Chandrakanth R. Kancharla, Jens Vankeirsbilck, Dries Vanoost, Jeroen Boydens, Hans Hallez

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

Condition-based maintenance (CBM) is becoming a necessity in modern manufacturing units. Particular focus is given to predicting bearing conditions as they are known to be the major reason for machine down time. With the open-source availability of different datasets from various sources and certain data-driven models, the research community has achieved good results for diagnosing faults in bearing fault datasets. However, existing data-driven fault diagnosis methods do not focus on the changing conditions of a machine or assume all conditional data are available all the time. In reality, conditions vary over time. This variability can be based on the measurement noise and operating conditions of the monitored machines such as radial load, axial load, rotation speed, etc. Moreover, the availability of the data measured in varying operating conditions is scarce, as it is not always feasible to collect in-process data in every possible condition or setting. Considering such a scenario, it is necessary to develop methodologies that are robust to conditional variability, i.e., methodologies to transfer the learning from one condition to another without prior knowledge of the variability. This paper proposes the usage of latent values of an auto-encoder as robust features for inter-conditional fault classification. The proposed robust classification method MLCAE-KNN is implemented in three steps. First, the time series data are transformed using Fast Fourier Transform. Using the transformed data of any one condition, a Multi-Layer Convolutional Auto-Encoder (MLCAE) is trained. Next, a K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) classifier is trained based on the latent features of MLCAE. The so-trained MLCAE-KNN is then used to predict the fault class of any new observation from a new condition. The results of using the latent features of the Auto-Encoder show superior inter-conditional classification robustness and superior accuracies compared to the state-of-the-art.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

M-Group, DistriNet, Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven Bruges Campus, 8200 Bruges, Belgium

M-Group, WaveCoRE, Department of Electrical Engineering, KU Leuven Bruges Campus, 8200 Bruges, Belgium

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Li, Z., Wang, K., and He, Y. (2016). Industry 4.0—Potentials for Predictive Maintenance. 6th International Workshop of Advanced Manufacturing and Automation, Atlantis Press.10.2991/iwama-16.2016.8 ↗
2. Condition-based maintenance implementation: A literature review10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.033 ↗
3. A Combined Data-Driven and Model-Based Residual Selection Algorithm for Fault Detection and Isolation10.1109/TCST.2017.2773514 ↗
4. Gonzalez-Jimenez, D., Del-Olmo, J., Poza, J., Garramiola, F., and Madina, P. (2021). Data-driven fault diagnosis for electric drives: A review. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21124024 ↗
5. An investigation on gearbox fault detection using vibration analysis techniques: A review10.7158/M11-830.2012.10.2 ↗
6. Wei, Y., Li, Y., Xu, M., and Huang, W. (2019). A review of early fault diagnosis approaches and their applications in rotating machinery. Entropy, 21.10.3390/e21040409 ↗
7. Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587 ↗
8. Multi-scale deep intra-class transfer learning for bearing fault diagnosis10.1016/j.ress.2020.107050 ↗
9. Toma, R.N., Prosvirin, A.E., and Kim, J.M. (2020). Bearing fault diagnosis of induction motors using a genetic algorithm and machine learning classifiers. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20071884 ↗
10. An enhanced convolutional neural network for bearing fault diagnosis based on time–frequency image10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107667 ↗
11. A new bearing fault diagnosis method based on modified convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.cja.2019.07.011 ↗
12. Euclidean distance based feature ranking and subset selection for bearing fault diagnosis10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113400 ↗
13. A novel Fast Entrogram and its applications in rolling bearing fault diagnosis10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107582 ↗
14. A survey on Deep Learning based bearing fault diagnosis10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.078 ↗
15. A systematic review of deep transfer learning for machinery fault diagnosis10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.045 ↗
16. Central moment discrepancy based domain adaptation for intelligent bearing fault diagnosis10.1016/j.neucom.2020.11.063 ↗
17. Ma, H., Li, S., and An, Z. (2019). A fault diagnosis approach for rolling bearing based on convolutional neural network and nuisance attribute projection under various speed conditions. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9081603 ↗
18. Multitask Convolutional Neural Network with Information Fusion for Bearing Fault Diagnosis and Localization10.1109/TIE.2019.2942548 ↗
19. Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: A benchmark study10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.021 ↗
20. Lessmeier, C., Kimotho, J.K., Zimmer, D., and Sextro, W. (2016, January 5–8). Condition monitoring of bearing damage in electromechanical drive systems by using motor current signals of electric motors: A benchmark data set for data-driven classification. Proceedings of the Third European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2016, Bilbao, Spain.10.36001/phme.2016.v3i1.1577 ↗
21. Visualizing data using t-SNE
22. The distance function effect on k-nearest neighbor classification for medical datasets10.1186/s40064-016-2941-7 ↗
23. Effects of Distance Measure Choice on K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier Performance: A Review10.1089/big.2018.0175 ↗