Show source-provided references
1. US EPA (2020, August 18). National Summary of Impaired Waters and TMDL Information, Available online: https://iaspub.epa.gov/waters10/attains_nation_cy.control?p_report_type=T.
2. US CDC (2020, August 18). Recreational Water Illnesses, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/swimming/swimmers/rwi.html.
4. USGS (2020, August 18). Bacteria and E. coli in Water, Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/special-topic/water-science-school/science/bacteria-and-e-coli-water?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects.
5. US EPA (2020, August 18). Recreational Water Quality Criteria and Methods, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/wqc/recreational-water-quality-criteria-and-methods.
8. Spatiotemporal variation of bacterial water quality and the relationship with pasture land cover
10.2166/wh.2017.101 ↗9. NC DEQ (2020, August 18). Nutrient Sensitive Waters and Special Watersheds, Available online: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/nsw-special-watersheds.
10. A public health perspective on onsite wastewater systems
11. Contributions to enhancing the public health perspective on onsite wastewater management
12. Shellfishing Closures in Southwest Brunswick County, North Carolina: Septic Tanks vs. Storm-Water Runoff as Fecal Coliform Sources
10.2112/03-0028.1 ↗16. Concentrations and Exports of Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Watersheds with Varying Densities of Onsite Wastewater Systems
10.1007/s11270-018-3929-4 ↗19. Sand filters for removal of microbes and nutrients from wastewater during a one-year pilot study in a cold temperate climate
10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.008 ↗20. Evaluation of the distribution of fecal indicator bacteria in a river system depending on different types of land use in the southern watershed of the Baltic Sea
21. Multiple modes of water quality impairment by fecal contamination in a rapidly developing coastal area: Southwest Brunswick County, North Carolina
10.1007/s10661-015-5081-6 ↗22. Cahoon. Risks to Coastal Wastewater Collection Systems from Sea-Level Rise and Climate Change
24. Evaluating the influence of septic systems and watershed characteristics on stream faecal pollution in suburban watersheds in Georgia, USA
10.1111/jam.12614 ↗25. US Census (2020, August 18). Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Counties in the United States: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2019 (CO-EST2019-ANNRES), Available online: https://data.census.gov/cedsci.
26. NC DEQ (2020, August 18). 2018 North Carolina 303(d) List of Impaired Waters, Available online: https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/TMDL/303d/2018/2018-NC-303-d--List-Final.pdf.
27. UNRBA (2020, August 18). Lick Creek Watershed Restoration Plan, Available online: https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Neuse_River_Basin/Lick_Creek/UNRBA_Lick%20Creek_LWP.pdf.
28. City of Durham (2020, August 18). Little Lick Creek Watershed Plan, Available online: https://durhamnc.gov/960/Little-Lick-Creek-Watershed-Improvement-.
29. USDA (2020, August 18). Web Soil Survey, Available online: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm.
30. Rantz, S.E. (1982). Measurement and Computation of Streamflow: Volume 1. Measurement of Stage and Discharge, USGS Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2175.
34. R Core Team (2020, September 17). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/.
37. Influence of seasonal and inter-annual hydro-meteorological variability on surface water fecal coliform concentration under varying land-use composition
10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.031 ↗38. Anderson, C.W.S.A. (2003). Rounds. Phosphorus and E. coli and Their Relation to Selected Constituents During Storm Runoff Conditions in Fanno Creek, Oregon, 1998–99, USGS.
39. Kubera, Ł., Małecka-Adamowicz, M., Jankowiak, E., Dembowska, E., Perliński, P., and Hejze, K. (2019). Influence of Environmental and Anthropogenic Factors on Microbial Ecology and Sanitary Threat in the Final Stretch of the Brda River. Water, 11.
10.3390/w11050922 ↗41. Seasonal variability of faecal indicator bacteria numbers and die-off rates in the Red River basin, North Viet Nam
10.1038/srep21644 ↗43. Land use and hydroclimatic influences on Faecal Indicator Organisms in two large Scottish catchments: Towards land use-based models as screening tools
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.090 ↗45. Groundwater quality impacts from the land application of treated municipal wastewater in a large karstic spring basin: Chemical and microbiological indicators
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.022 ↗47. The Influence of Urban Density and Drainage Infrastructure on the Concentrations and Loads of Pollutants in Small Streams
10.1007/s00267-004-0221-8 ↗48. Landers, M.N., and Paul, D. (2008). Ankcorn. Methods to Evaluate Influence of Onsite Septic Wastewater-Treatment Systems on Base Flow in Selected Watersheds in Gwinnett County, Georgia, October 2007, U.S. Geological Survey.
10.3133/sir20085220 ↗