journal article·2021-05-25Open access

Effect of Mouth Mask and Face Shield on Speech Spectrum in Slovak Language

Vojtech Chmelík, Daniel Urbán, Lukáš Zelem, Monika Rychtáriková

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

In this paper, with the aim of assessing the deterioration of speech intelligibility caused by a speaker wearing a mask, different face masks (surgical masks, FFP2 mask, homemade textile-based protection and two kinds of plastic shields) are compared in terms of their acoustic filtering effect, measured by placing the mask on an artificial head/mouth simulator. For investigating the additional effects on the speaker’s vocal output, speech was also recorded while people were reading a text when wearing a mask, and without a mask. In order to discriminate between effects of acoustic filtering by the mask and mask-induced effects of vocal output changes, the latter was monitored by measuring vibrations at the suprasternal notch, using an attached accelerometer. It was found that when wearing a mask, people tend to slightly increase their voice level, while when wearing plastic face shield, they reduce their vocal power. Unlike the Lombard effect, no significant change was found in the spectral content. All face mask and face shields attenuate frequencies above 1–2 kHz. In addition, plastic shields also increase frequency components to around 800 Hz, due to resonances occurring between the face and the shield. Finally, special attention was given to the Slavic languages, in particular Slovak, which contain a large variety of sibilants. Male and female speech, as well as texts with and without sibilants, was compared.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Noise Effects and Management · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Speech and Audio Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Engineering and Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, STU Bratislava, 812 43 Bratislava, Slovakia

Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil Engineering, STU Bratislava, 812 43 Bratislava, Slovakia

Faculty of Architecture, KU Leuven, Campus Gent and Brussel, 1030 Brussel, Belgium

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Garcia, L.P., and Duarte, E. (2020). Intervenções não farmacológicas para o enfrentamento à epidemia da COVID-19 no Brasil. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde, 29.10.5123/S1679-49742020000200009 ↗
2. COVID-19 transmission through asymptomatic carriers is a challenge to containment10.1111/irv.12743 ↗
3. Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: A mathematical modelling study10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30144-4 ↗
4. WHO (2020, March 12). Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19–11 March 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020.
5. (2020, May 19). Public Health Authority of The Slovak Republic; OLP/4084/2020. Available online: https://www.uvzsr.sk/docs/info/covid19/Opatrenie_UVZ_SR_o_zakaze_a_obmedzeni_prevadzok_15032020.pdf.
6. (2020, January 07). WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.
7. Face coverings and mask to minimise droplet dispersion and aerosolisation: A video case study10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215748 ↗
8. Optimizing communication in schools and other settings during COVID-1910.1097/01.HJ.0000717184.65906.b9 ↗
9. The COVID-19 pandemic and face shields10.1002/bjs.11842 ↗
10. Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols10.1121/10.0002873 ↗
11. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 ↗
12. Saeidi, R., Huhtakallio, I., and Alku, P. (2016, January 18–12). Analysis of Face Mask Effect on Speaker Recognition. Proceedings of the Interspeech 2016, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.21437/Interspeech.2016-518 ↗
13. (2021, January 01). PapaBuild, Acoustic Effect of Face Shield & Mouth Mask on Choir Sound. Available online: https://www.papabuild.eu/acoustic-effect-face-shield-mouth-mask/.
14. Hampton, T., Crunkhorn, R., Lowe, N., Bhat, J., Hogg, E., Afifi, W., and Sharma, S. (2020). Speech discrimination challenges of healthcare professionals whilst wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Authorea Prepr.10.22541/au.159050338.83886289 ↗
15. How do medical masks degrade speech perception
16. Mutual dependence of the octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility10.1016/S0167-6393(99)00007-2 ↗
17. Effect of masks on speech intelligibility in auralized class-rooms10.1121/10.0002450 ↗
18. Acoustic effects of medical, cloth, and transparent face masks on speech signals10.1121/10.0002279 ↗
19. Kritly, L., Sluyts, Y., Vandenberghe, A., Glorieux, C., and Rychtarikova, M. (2020, January 16–24). Acoustic effect of face shield and mouth mask on speech and vocal music. Proceedings of the EPF Comfort Conference, Troyes, France.
20. Das, R.K., and Li, H. (2020, January 7–10). Classification of Speech with and without Face Mask using Acoustic Features. Proceedings of the 2020 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
21. Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask
22. Effects of Different Types of Face Coverings on Speech Acoustics and Intelligibility
23. Speech understanding using surgical masks: A problem in health care?10.3766/jaaa.19.9.4 ↗
24. Speech intelligibility assessment of protective facemasks and air-purifying respirators10.1080/15459624.2016.1200723 ↗
25. Does wearing a surgical facemask or N95-respirator impair radio communication?10.1016/j.amj.2010.12.007 ↗
26. (2003). ISO 9921:2003 Ergonomics—Assessment of Speech Communication, International Standards Organization.
27. Air-borne and tissue-borne sensitivities of bioacoustic sensors used on the skin surface10.1109/TBME.2008.2008165 ↗
28. Stevens, K.N. (2000). Acoustic Phonetics, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1072.001.0001 ↗