Intensity Measure Based on a Smooth Inelastic Peak Period for a More Effective Incremental Dynamic Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
The Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) assesses the global collapse capacity of a structure by plotting its maximum inelastic response, obtained through a non-linear time-history analysis, versus the scaled intensity of different input earthquakes. The seismic intensity is often measured through the spectral acceleration at the fundamental elastic period. However, this can produce highly variable results. An alternative method is presented in this paper that relies on the elongated period, calculated either from the Fourier spectrum of the acceleration at a target building point (inelastic peak period) or from a smooth Fourier spectrum (inelastic smooth peak period). By referring to a reference reinforced concrete building and to a set of 10 spectrum-consistent earthquakes, the paper presents the results of a wide investigation. First, the variation in the elongated period as a function of the seismic intensity is discussed. Then, the effectiveness of the proposed method is assessed by comparing the IDA curves to those obtained through the elastic period or through approximate values of the elongated period given in the literature. The results show that the alternative IDA procedure generates curves with less-dispersed collapse thresholds. A statistical analysis shows significant improvements in the results when the inelastic smooth peak period is adopted.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil Engineering School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile
Department of Civil Engineering, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, 09131 Cagliari, Italy
Structural and Geotecnic Departament, Pontificia Universidad Católica, Santiago 7820436, Chile
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Seismic performance of buildings with waffled-slab floors10.1680/stbu.2009.162.3.169 ↗
2. Non-linear analyses to assess the seismic performance of RC buildings retrofitted with FRP
3. Seismic Retrofit of Existing Buildings Led by Non-Linear Dynamic Analyses
4. Non-linear dynamic analysis to assess the seismic performance of cross-laminated timber structures10.1016/j.jobe.2018.06.008 ↗
5. Code inadequacies discouraging the earthquake-based seismic analysis of buildings
6. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2012). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Methodology FEMA P-58-1.
7. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Fema P695.
8. Approximate two-component incremental dynamic analysis using a bidirectional energy-based pushover procedure10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.056 ↗
9. Seismic performance assessment of different fibers reinforced concrete columns using incremental dynamic analysis10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.087 ↗
10. A new damage index for steel MRFs based on incremental dynamic analysis10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.02.005 ↗
11. Evaluation of the seismic behavior factor of reinforced concrete frame structures based on comparative analysis between non-linear static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses10.1007/s10518-014-9689-7 ↗
12. Seismic capacity assessment of post main shock damaged containment structures using nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis10.1002/tal.1706 ↗
13. Correlation between ground motion intensity measures and seismic damage of 3D R/C buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.035 ↗
14. Incremental dynamic analysis of seismic collapse of super-tall building structures10.1002/tal.1370 ↗
15. Incremental dynamic collapse analysis of RC core-wall tall buildings considering spatial seismic response distributions10.1002/tal.1383 ↗
16. Incremental dynamic analysis with multi-modes for seismic performance evaluation of RC bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.026 ↗
17. Intensity measures for the seismic response assessment of plain concrete arch bridges10.1007/s10518-018-0334-8 ↗
18. Advanced scalar intensity measures for collapse capacity prediction of steel moment resisting frames with fluid viscous dampers10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.009 ↗
19. Incremental dynamic analysis10.1002/eqe.141 ↗
20. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions10.1193/1.2723158 ↗
21. Incremental dynamic analysis applied to assessment of structure-specific earthquake IMs in 3D R/C buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.007 ↗
22. Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses10.1002/eqe.386 ↗
23. Vector-valued intensity measures for incremental dynamic analysis10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.014 ↗
24. Spectral ground motion intensity based on capacity and period elongation10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000084 ↗
25. Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes10.1002/eqe.2603 ↗
26. Evaluation of bias on the probability of collapse from amplitude scaling using spectral-shape-matched records10.1002/eqe.3172 ↗
27. Bias assessment in Incremental Dynamic Analysis due to record scaling10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.09.007 ↗
28. Fontara, I.M., Athanatopoulou, A.M., and Avramidis, I.E. (2012, January 24–28). Correlation between Advanced, Structure-Specific Ground Motion Intensity Measures and Damage Indices. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
29. Evaluation of characteristic peak ground acceleration (CPGA) as a ground motion intensity measure to reduce the dispersion of IDA curves10.1007/s42107-020-00259-7 ↗
30. Vibration-based damage identification methods: A review and comparative study10.1177/1475921710365419 ↗
31. Effectiveness of the FRF curvature technique for structural health monitoring10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.123 ↗
32. Prediction of inelastic response periods of buildings based on intensity measures and analytical model parameters10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.007 ↗
33. Period elongation of deteriorating structures under mainshock-aftershock sequences
34. (2020, March 01). Seismosoft, SeismoStruct 2020—A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures. Available online: http://www.seismosoft.com.
35. (2020, March 01). Eurocode 8, European Standard EN 1998-2:2006: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 2: Bridges. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/188fca6f-bf5e-48c2-b384-8b14d0264e62/sist-en-1998-2-2006.
36. NTC (2018). Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, NTC.
37. REXEL: Computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1 ↗
38. Seismosoft (2020, March 01). SeismoSpect 2020—Signal Processing for Ground Motion Records. Available online: https://seismosoft.com/.
39. American Society of Civil Engineers (2000). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers. Report ASCE/SEI 7-10.
40. Papadrakakis, M., Fragiadakis, M., and Lagaros, N. (2010). Seismic response of the RC framed buildings designed according to Eurocodes. Computational Methods in Earthquake Engineering, Springer.