journal article·2020-08-17Open access

Surface Morphology of Three-Dimensionally Printed Replicas of Upper Dental Arches

Hana Eliasova, Tatjana Dostalova, Miroslav Jelinek, Jan Remsa, Pavel Bradna, Ales Prochazka, Magdalena Kloubcova

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 16

Abstract

The aim of our study was to analyze the precision of fused-deposition modeling (FDM), polyjet technology (PJ), stereolithography (SLA) and selective laser sintering (SLS) and to evaluate some interesting indications of these methods in clinical practice. Forty upper dental arches were scanned using a 3Shape Trios 3R optical scanner system and 3D models were made. An Atos II 400 optical 3D scanner was used for calculating the coordinates of points by optical triangulation, photogrammetry and fringe projection. Each model was scanned from a minimum of 56 positions to evaluate global coordinates. Surface morphology was evaluated with an Alpha Step IQ profilometer and a JSM 5510 LV scanning electron microscope. From the measurements in cross-sections it was evident that the deviation shifted by approximately 0.1 mm. The smoothest and most homogeneous sample was SLA. SLS and SLA samples showed the most similar results in comparison of perpendicular directions (homogeneity). FDM and PJ materials exhibited significantly greater roughness in the printing direction than in the perpendicular one, which is most likely caused by the technology selected and/or print parameters. Clinical applications have demonstrated unusual treatment options for patients with rare diseases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Anthropology, Biology and Physiodetection, Institute of Criminalistics, Police of the Czech Republic, Strojnická 27, 170 89 Prague, Czech Republic

Department of Stomatology, 2nd Medical Faculty and Motol University Hospital, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 5, Czech Republic

Department of Optical and Biophysical Systems, Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 00 Prague 8, Czech Republic

Department of Stomatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Katerinska 32, 121 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic

Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, Jugoslavskych Partyzanu 3, 160 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic

Department of Computing and Control Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry
2. Three-dimensional prediction of roots position through cone-beam computed tomography scans-digital model superimposition: A novel method10.1111/ocr.12252 ↗
3. Intraoral scanner technologies: A review to make a successful impression10.1155/2017/8427595 ↗
4. Staderini, E., Patini, R., Camodeca, A., Guglielmi, F., and Gallenzi, P. (2019). Three-Dimensional Assessment of Morphological Changes Following Nasoalveolar Molding Therapy in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Case Report. Dent. J., 7.10.3390/dj7010027 ↗
5. Effect of scan substrates on accuracy of 7 intraoral digital impression systems using human maxilla model10.1111/ocr.12273 ↗
6. Kasparova, M., Halamova, S., Dostalova, T., and Prochazka, A. (2018). Intra-oral 3D scanning for the digital evaluation of dental arch parameters. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8101838 ↗
7. Dual-setting brushite-silica gel cements10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.036 ↗
8. Damping of Selective-Laser-Melted NiTi for Medical Implants10.1007/s11665-014-0889-8 ↗
9. Combining multi-scale 3D printing technologies to engineer reinforced hydrogel-ceramic interfaces10.1088/1758-5090/ab69d9 ↗
10. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
11. (2020, May 20). Stratasys Ltd.. Available online: http://www.stratasys.com.
12. Dostalova, T., Kasparova, M., and Chleborad, K. (2019, January 3). Intraoral Scanner and Stereographic 3D Print in Orthodontics. Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Lasers in Dentistry XXV, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1117/12.2507233 ↗
13. Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models10.1186/1475-925X-12-49 ↗
14. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy10.1007/s00056-019-00180-y ↗
15. Intraoral scanner and stereographic 3D print in dentistry-quality and accuracy of model-new laser application in clinical practice10.1088/1555-6611/aae067 ↗
16. Stratasys (2020, June 06). FDM Thermoplastics Material Overview. Available online: http://www.stratasys.com/materials/fdm.
17. Stratasys (2020, June 10). Dental Molding in Digital Dentistry. Available online: http://www.stratasys.com/materials/polyjet/dental-material.
18. Formlabs (2020, June 06). Professional 3D Printing Materials for Digital Dentistry. Available online: https://formlabs.com/materials/dentistry/.
19. Stratasys (2020, May 20). Biocompatible Materials used in 3D Printing. Available online: http://www.stratasys.com/materials/polyjet/bio-compatible.
20. Prochazka, A., Dostalova, T., Kasparova, M., Vysata, O., Charvatova, H., Sanei, S., and Marik, V. (2019). Augmented Reality Implementations in Stomatology. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9142929 ↗
21. High-Resolution Microfocus X-Ray Computed Tomography for 3D Surface Roughness Measurements of Additive Manufactured Porous Materials10.1002/adem.201200156 ↗
22. Cruz, N., Martins, M.I., Domingos Santos, J., Gil Mur, J., and Tondela, J.P. (2020). Surface Comparison of Three Different Commercial Custom-Made Titanium Meshes Produced by SLM for Dental Applications. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13092177 ↗
23. A 3D-printed functioning anatomical human middle ear model10.1016/j.heares.2015.12.025 ↗
24. Computed Tomography versus Optical Scanning: A Comparison of Different Methods of 3D Data Acquisition for Tooth Replication10.1155/2019/4985121 ↗
25. Evaluation of Two 3D Printers for Guided Implant Surgery10.11607/jomi.6074 ↗
26. Accuracy of impression scanning compared with stone casts of implant impressions10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.026 ↗
27. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.004 ↗
28. Roughness Measurement of Dental Materials10.1515/jtam-2016-0008 ↗
29. The use of micro-computed tomography in dental applications10.5577/intdentres.2019.vol9.no2.7 ↗
30. Under the mask of Kabuki syndrome: Elucidation of genetic-and phenotypic heterogeneity in patients with Kabuki-like phenotype10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.01.005 ↗
31. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing
32. Staderini, E., De Luca, M., and Candida, E. (2019). Lay People Esthetic Evaluation of Primary Surgical Repair on Three-Dimensional Images of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients. Medicina, 55.10.3390/medicina55090576 ↗