A CLIOS Analysis for the Promotion of Sustainable Plans of Mobility: The Case of Mexico City
Source abstract
Abstract
Transportation systems help in shaping an area’s economic health and quality of life, providing the infrastructure for the mobility of people and goods. Nevertheless, the negative externalities of car-oriented urban-metropolitan planning have heightened awareness for the need of urban planning approaches that incorporate sustainable mobility. Consequently, cities worldwide have increasingly produced sustainable mobility plans. This points to the need of creating mechanisms to implement these sustainable plans, particularly in large, complex, and fast-growing cities. This paper provides guidelines to facilitate the implementation of Sustainable Mobility Plans by focusing on the case of Mexico City. This is achieved by applying the complex large-scale integrated open systems (CLIOS) systemic analysis, in two steps: first, we facilitate the identification of the complexities and relationships among the essential systems of Mexico City’s urban structure, along with the recognition of their most important components and the institutions involved within the urban planning process. Second, we assess the effectiveness of the public policies–strategies that form part of Mexico City’s Sustainable Mobility Plan and organize them in order of importance. The results show which principal subsystems should be considered for sustainable mobility and which public policies–strategies should be prioritized in order to implement the aforementioned plan effectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urban Transport and Accessibility · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Complex Systems and Decision Making
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Engineering, UNAM National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico D.F. 04510, Mexico
Department of Geography and Regional Planning, School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece
Institute of Geography, UNAM, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico D.F. 04510, Mexico
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Land use and transportation: Identifying the relationship between parking and land use in the Municipality of Zografou, Athens
2. Hanson, S., and Giuliano, G. (2004). The Geography of Urban Transportation, Guilford Press. [3rd ed.].
3. Bakogiannis, E., Kyriakidis, C., Papagerasimou, T., and Kourmpa, E. (2018, January 22–23). Applying low-cost interventions for promoting sustainable mobility in cities. Proceedings of the 16th Tactical Scientific Conference (ERSA-GR), Athens, Greece.
4. Rodrigue, J.P. (2017). The Geography of Transport Systems, Routledge. [4th ed.].10.4324/9781315618159 ↗
5. The infrastructure projects in Greece and the presence of Mega Transport Infrastructure Projects (MTIPs): Changing paradigms and priorities
6. Infrastructure and economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa
7. Aschauer, D.A. (1991). Transportation Spending and Economic Growth: The Effects of Transit and Highway Expenditures, American Transit Association.
8. The impact of transport on the competitiveness of national economy
9. Evaluating the economic and regional impact on national transport and infrastructure policies with accessibility variables10.3846/16484142.2012.753641 ↗
10. Labor market institutions and income inequality: An empirical exploration10.1007/s11127-008-9339-1 ↗
11. Estache, A., and Fay, M. (2010). Current Debates on Infrastructure Policies, Commission on Growth and Development.
12. Public expenditure, growth and poverty reduction in rural Uganda10.1111/j.1467-8268.2008.00194.x ↗
13. The poverty impact of rural roads: Evidence from Bangladesh10.1086/598765 ↗
14. The productivity of transport infrastructure investment: A meta-analysis of empirical evidence10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.05.002 ↗
15. Mu, R., and van de Walle, D. (2007). Rural Roads and Poor Area Development in Vietnam, The World Bank.10.1596/1813-9450-4340 ↗
16. Schofer, J.L., and Mahmassani, H.S. (2016). Mobility 2050. A Vision for Transportation Infrastructure, The Transportation Center, Northwestern University.
17. Transport infrastructure, spatial spillover and economic growth: Evidence from China10.1007/s11459-008-0029-1 ↗
18. Flores, I., Chatziioannou, I., Segura, E., and Hernández, S. (2013, January 25–27). Urban transport infrastructure: A state of the art. Proceedings of the European Modelling and Simulation Symposium, Athens, Greece.
19. Tráfico inducido en México: Contribuciones al debate e implicaciones de política pública10.24201/edu.v21i1.1263 ↗
20. Reconsidering Sustainable Mobility Patterns in Cultural Route Planning: Andreas Syngrou Avenue, Greece10.3390/heritage2020104 ↗
21. (2012, January 15). OMS. Available online: www.who.int/gho/en/.
22. Accidentes de tránsito: Asunto de Estado y Salud Pública
23. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster.10.1145/358916.361990 ↗
24. Hart, J. (2008). Driven to Excess: Impacts of Motor Vehicle Traffic on Residential Quality of Life in Bristol. [Master’s Thesis, University of West England].
25. Kyriakidis, C., Bakogiannis, E., and Siolas, A. (2017, January 17–19). Identifying Environmental Affordances in Kypseli Square in Athens, Greece. Proceedings of the International New York Conference on Social Sciences, New York, NY, USA.
26. (2020, January 03). European Union. Available online: https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/guidelines_for_developing_and_implementing_a_sustainable_urban_mobility_plan_2nd_edition.pdf.
27. (2020, January 03). European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/legislation/com%282013%29913-annex_en.pdf.
28. UN-Habitat (2012). Mobility, UN-Habitat.
29. Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M. Sustainable urban mobility indicators: Policy versus practice in the case of Greek cities10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.122 ↗
30. Van Audenhove, F.-J., Korniichuk, O., Dauby, L., and Pourbaix, J. (2014). The Future of Urban Mobility 2.0, ADL UITP.
31. Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities?10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.004 ↗
32. Kelly, J., Grosvenor, T., and Jones, P. (2004). Guidemaps Consortium. Successful Transport Decision-Making. A Project Management and Stakeholder Engagement Handbook, Fastcolour Limited.
33. Hautala, R., Karvonen, V., Laitinen, J., Laurikko, J., Nylund, N.-O., Pihlatie, M., Rantasila, K., and Tuominen, A. (2014). Smart Sustainable Mobility, VTT Visions 5.
34. Upgrading quality in urban mobility systems10.1108/09604520110387211 ↗
35. New framework for monitoring urban mobility in European cities10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.081 ↗
36. (2019, April 02). Uradni List Evropske Unije, “Informacije in Objave”. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/SL/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2014:271:TOC.
37. Rupprecht Consult (2015). Trajnostna Mobilnost za Uspešno Prihodnost, Smernice za Pripravo CPS.
38. Sustainable accessibility: A conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflflection on the way forward10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.006 ↗
39. Okraszewska, R., Romanowska, A., Wołek, M., Oskarbski, J., Birr, K., and Jamroz, K. (2018). Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10020479 ↗
40. Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: A systematic review of the state of the art literature10.3846/16484142.2015.1121517 ↗
41. Maghraoui, O.A., Vallet, F., Puchinger, J., and Yannou, B. (2017, January 21–25). Framing key concepts to design a human centered urban mobility system. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
42. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2014). Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility: Global Report on Human Settlements, Routledge.
43. May, A. (2016). Ch4llenge Measure Selection Manual–Selecting the Most Effective Packages of Measures for Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans, European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans.
44. Sussman, J., Dodder, R., McConnel, J., Mostashari, A., and Sgouridis, S. (2007). The Clios Process: A User’s Guide. Frameworks and Models in Engineering Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Publications.
45. COIM: An object-process based method for analyzing architectures of complex, interconnected, large-scale socio-technical systems10.1002/sys.20185 ↗
46. Sussman, J., and Sgouridis, S. (2004, January 29–31). Regional Strategic Transportation Planning as a CLIOS. Proceedings of the MIT Engineering Systems Symposium, Cambridge, MA, USA.
47. Sussman, J., Sgouridis, S., and Ward, J. (2005). New Approach to Transportation Planning for the 21st Century–Regional Strategic Transportation Planning as a Complex Large-Scale Integrated Open System, Transportation Research Board Natl Research Council. Planning and Analysis 2005.10.3141/1931-12 ↗
48. Sussman, J. (2005). The CLIOS Process, Special Edition for the East Japan Railway Company, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
49. Sussman, J. (2005). Perspectives on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), Springer Science + Business Media.
50. Sussman, J. (2000). Introduction to Transportation Systems, Artech House.
51. Dodder, R., and Sussman, J. (2002). The Concept of a CLIOS Analysis Illustrated by the Mexico City Case, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Engineering Systems Division Working Paper Series 2002, ESD-WP-2003-01.07-ESD Internal Symposium).
52. Dodder, R., Sussman, J., and McConnell, J. (2004, January 29–31). The Concept of the “CLIOS PROCESS”: Integrating the study of physical and policy systems using Mexico City as an example. Proceedings of the Engineering Systems Division Symposium, Cambridge, MA, USA.
53. Rupprecht Consult (2020, January 08). Guidelines for Developing and Implementing a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan, 2nd ed. Available online: https://www.eltis.org/mobility-plans/sump-guidelines.
54. Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: A literature review10.1007/s10479-014-1681-8 ↗
55. Sarasini, S., Diener, D., Sochor, J., and Vanacore, E. (2018). Stimulating a Transition to Sustainable Urban. Mobility, JPI Urban Europe.
56. Buhrmann, S., Wefering, F., Rupprecht, S., Plevnik, A., Mladenoviˇc, L., Balant, M., and Ružiˇc, L. (2012). Trajnostna Mobilnost za Uspešno Prihodnost: Smernice za Pripravo Celostne Prometne Strategije.
57. (2020, January 03). CTS EMBARQ. Available online: http://bibliotecadigital.imipens.org/uploads/Reforma%20Urbana%20100%20Ideas%20para%20las%20Ciudades%20de%20Mexico%20-%20ctsEM.pdf.
58. Medina, S. (2012). La Importancia de la Reducción del Uso del Automóvil en México. Tendencias de Motorización, del Uso del Automóvil y de sus Impactos, ITDP.
59. Sussman, J. (2002, January 29–30). Collected Views on Complexity in Systems. Proceedings of the Engineering Systems Division (ESD) Internal Symposium, Cambridge, MA, USA.
60. Sánchez-Lara, B. (2010, January 27–30). Enseñando Ingeniería de Sistemas usando Análisis CLIOS” Eje temático: Ingeniería y Gestión de Sistemas. Proceedings of the XIV Congreso Internacional de la Academia de Ciencias Administrativas, A. C. (ACACIA), Mexico City, Mexico.
61. Chias Becerril, L., and Cervantes Trejo, A. (2008). Diagnóstico Espacial de los Accidentes de Tránsito en el Distrito Federal, Secretaría de Salud.
62. (2020, February 04). SEMOVI. Available online: https://semovi.cdmx.gob.mx/storage/app/media/plan-estrategico-de-convivencia-vial-2019-para-la-ciudad-de-mexico-200619.pdf.
63. Herrera, S. (2012, January 7–8). ¿Movilidad y Ciudad?. Proceedings of the Foro Internacional Sobre el Derecho a la Movilidad, Mexico City, Mexico.
64. ITDP (2012). Transforming Urban Mobility in Mexico, ITDP.
65. ITDP (2012). Planes Integrales de Movilidad, ITDP.
66. Nieto Enríquez, A. (2014, January 24–26). El Desafío de la movilidad y la Gestión de la Ciudad. Proceedings of the 6th Congreso Internacional de Transporte, Mexico City, Mexico.
67. (2019, August 04). SEMOVI. Available online: https://semovi.cdmx.gob.mx/storage/app/media/uploaded-files/plan-estrategico-de-movilidad-2019.pdf.
68. Flood, R.L., and Carson, E.R. (1993). Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science, Plenum Press. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-1-4757-2235-2 ↗
69. MacroEconomic Determinants of Urbanization in Pakistan10.20448/journal.511.2018.51.6.12 ↗
70. De Saulles, M. (2015). Information 2.0: New Models of Information Production, Distribution and Consumption, Facet Publishing.
71. A structural analysis method for the management of urban transportation infrastructure and its urban surroundings10.1080/23311916.2017.1326548 ↗
72. Evaluation of the urban transportation infrastructure and its urban surroundings in the Iztapalapa County: A geotechnology approach about its management10.1080/23311916.2017.1330854 ↗
73. Min-Max and Predictive Control for the Management of Distribution in Supply Chains10.1109/TCST.2010.2076283 ↗
74. Kamath, M., Srivathsan, S., Ingalls, R., Shen, G., and Pulat, P. (2011, January 4–7). TISCSoft: A Decision Support System for Transportation Infrastructure and Supply Chain System Planning. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA.10.1109/HICSS.2011.441 ↗
75. Part I: Externalities and economic policies in road transport10.1016/j.retrec.2009.11.002 ↗
76. Towle, G. (2011, January 3–5). Porque el futuro no va a ser como el pasado, sino mejor. (Why the Future Won’t be Like the Past, but Better.). Proceedings of the VII Congreso Internacional de Transporte Sostenible, Ciudad de México (VII International Congress on Sustainable Transport, Mexico City), Mexico City, Mexico.
77. Kramar, U., Dragan, D., and Topolšek, D. (2019). The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11236599 ↗
78. Trip making, induced travel demand, and accessibility10.1007/s10109-005-0158-3 ↗
79. Chatziioannou, I. (2017). Modelo para la Gestión de la Infraestructura de Transporte Urbano y su Entorno en la Ciudad de México. [PhD Thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México].
80. García-Ortega, S. (2009). Diagnóstico de la Viabilidad Organizacional del Sistema de Transporte de la Ciudad de México. [Master’s Thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México].
81. Boguski, T. (2006). Understanding Units of Measurement, Environmental Science and Technology Briefs for Citizens, Center for Hazardous Substance, Kansas State University.
82. (2019, December 19). INEGI. Available online: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/intercensal/2015/default.html#Tabulados.
83. (2019, December 20). SCT. Available online: http://www.sct.gob.mx/fileadmin/DireccionesGrales/DGST/Datos-Viales-2019/00_INTRODUCCI%C3%93N.pdf.
84. Zhang, G., Yang, H., Li, S., Wen, Y., Li, Y., and Liu, F. (2019, January 14–17). What is the best catchment area of bike shares station? A study based on Divvy system in Chicago USA. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), Liverpool, UK.10.1109/ICTIS.2019.8883774 ↗
85. Flamm, B., and Rivasplata, C.R. (2014). Public Transit catchment areas: The curious case of of cycle-transit users. Transportation Research Record. J. Transp. Res. Board, 2419.10.3141/2419-10 ↗
86. (2020, January 07). SEDATU. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/sedatu/documentos/anatomia-de-la-movilidad-en-mexico-hacia-donde-vamos?idiom=es.
87. Hacia un nuevo sistema de indicadores de bienestar. Realidad Datos y Espacio
88. Garro Flores, F. (2020, January 03). Available online: http://www.olade.org/sites/default/files/seminarios/namas/MRV%20NAMAs%20CUBA_FGF-AENOR.pdf.
89. (2020, January 04). INE, PNUD, CTS EMBARQ México. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/110169/CGCCDBC_2012_Politicas_medidas_e_instrumentos_para_la_mitigacion.pdf.
90. Algunas reflexiones sobre la movilidad urbana en Colombia desde la perspectiva del desarrollo humano
91. Ascher, F. (2004). Los Nuevos Principios del Urbanismo, Alianza.
92. Rojas, F. (2007). Mutaciones Urbanas. Memorias II Coloquio de Profesores de la Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
93. Appleyard, D. (1969). Livable Streets, University of California Press.
94. Avellaneda, P., and Lazo, A. (April, January 31). Aproximación social al estudio de la movilidad cotidiana en la periferia pobre de la ciudad. Los casos de Juan Pablo II, en Lima, y de La Pintana, en Santiago de Chile. Proceedings of the XV Congreso Latinoamericano de Transporte Público y Urbano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
95. Gutiérrez, A. (April, January 31). Movilidad o inmovilidad: ¿Qué es la movilidad? Aprendiendo a delimitar los deseos. Proceedings of the XV Congreso Latinoamericano de Transporte Público y Urbano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
96. Gutiérrez, A. (April, January 31). Movilidad y acceso: Embarazo y salud pública en la periferia de Buenos Aires. Proceedings of the XV Congreso Latinoamericano de Transporte Público y Urbano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
97. Gutiérrez, A. (2009, January 3–7). La movilidad de la metrópolis desigual: El viaje a la salud pública y gratuita en la periferia de Buenos Aires. Proceedings of the XII Encuentro de Geógrafos de América Latina, Montevideo, Uruguay.
98. ¿Qué es la movilidad? Elementos para reconstruir las definiciones básicas del campo de transporte
99. Hernández, D. (April, January 31). Los desafíos del Transporte Público como canal de acceso al bienestar y mecanismo de integración social. El caso de Santiago de Chile. Proceedings of the XV Congreso Latinoamericano de Transporte Público y Urbano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
100. Jara, M., and Carrasco, J.A. (April, January 31). Indicadores de inclusión social, accesibilidad y movilidad: Experiencias desde la perspectiva del sistema de transporte. Proceedings of the XV Congreso Latinoamericano de Transporte Público y Urbano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.