journal article·2020-07-29Open access

A Challenge: Support of Standing Balance in Assistive Robotic Devices

Vittorio Lippi, Thomas Mergner

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 15

Abstract

Neurological patients using a powered lower-body exoskeleton for rehabilitation of standing and walking skills in an upright body pose face the safety challenge of postural instability and fall. Current research, therefore, develops exoskeletons with self-balancing functions. This study suggests basing the exoskeleton’s stabilization of standing posture on a human-derived postural control mechanism. A corresponding control system has previously been successfully tested with specific balancing tasks in humanoid robots. Here, we provide a short introduction into the control method and, using a lightweight robot, present as a test of the balancing an experimental shift in the body weight distribution (as if, e.g., a human exoskeleton user was raising an arm or leaning the upper body or lifting an external weight). An overview of other specific balancing tests previously already investigated in humans and humanoids is also briefly mentioned. Overall, the tests will allow the quantification of the capabilities of self-balancing exoskeletons developed for patients with partial paralysis of lower body sensorimotor functions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fachgebiet Regelungssysteme, Technische Universität Berlin, Einsteinufer 17, D-10587 Berlin, Germany

Neurological Clinic at the University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 64, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Exoskeleton-assisted gait training to improve gait in individuals with spinal cord injury: a pilot randomized study10.1186/s40814-018-0247-y ↗
2. Review of assistive strategies in powered lower-limb orthoses and exoskeletons10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.032 ↗
3. Exoskeletons’ design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury
4. Premature degenerative shoulder changes in spinal cord injury patients10.1038/sj.sc.3100608 ↗
5. Spinal Cord Injury Research Evidence (SCIRE) Research Team Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study10.1186/s12984-015-0074-9 ↗
6. Talaty, M., Esquenazi, A., and Briceno, J.E. (2013, January 20–24). Differentiating ability in users of the ReWalkTM powered exoskeleton: An analysis of walking kinematics. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650469 ↗
7. A neurological view on reactive human stance control10.1016/j.arcontrol.2010.08.001 ↗
8. An adaptive control strategy for postural stability using a wearable robot10.1016/j.robot.2014.11.014 ↗
9. Effects of a powered ankle-foot orthosis on perturbed standing balance10.1186/s12984-018-0393-8 ↗
10. Emmens, A., Van Asseldonk, E., Masciullo, M., Aquila, M., Pisotta, I., Tagliamonte, N.L., Tamburella, F., Molinari, M., and Van Der Kooij, H. (2018, January 26–29). Improving the Standing Balance of Paraplegics through the Use of a Wearable Exoskeleton. Proceedings of the 2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob), Enschede, The Netherlands.10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8488066 ↗
11. Khalili, M., Machiel Van der Loos, H., and Borisoff, J. (2019, January 24–28). Studies on Practical Applications of Safe-Fall Control Strategies for Lower Limb Exoskeletons. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779382 ↗
12. Review of balance recovery in response to external perturbations during daily activities10.1016/j.humov.2019.102546 ↗
13. (2020, July 06). Robotic Exoskeleton Exo-H3|Technaid—Leading Motion. Available online: https://www.technaid.com/products/robotic-exoskeleton-exo-exoesqueleto-h3/.
14. Hyon, S., Morimoto, J., Matsubara, T., Noda, T., and Kawato, M. (2011, January 25–30). XoR: Hybrid drive exoskeleton robot that can balance. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/IROS.2011.6095079 ↗
15. Chang, M., Kim, Y., Lee, Y., and Jeon, D. (2017, January 17–20). A research on the postural stability of a person wearing the lower limb exoskeletal robot by the HAT model. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), London, UK.10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009275 ↗
16. Khalili, M., Borisoff, J., and Van der Loos, H. (2017, January 17–20). Developing safe fall strategies for lower limb exoskeletons. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), London, UK.10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009266 ↗
17. Vestibular humanoid postural control
18. A simple model of vestibular canal-otolith signal fusion10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09211.x ↗
19. Atkenson, C., and Stephens, B. (December, January 29). Multiple balance strategies from one optimization criterion. Proceedings of the 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.10.1109/ICHR.2007.4813849 ↗
20. Whole-body multi-contact motion in humans and humanoids: Advances of the CoDyCo European project10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.017 ↗
21. Benchmarking Bipedal Locomotion: A Unified Scheme for Humanoids, Wearable Robots, and Humans10.1109/MRA.2015.2448278 ↗
22. Posture Control—Human-Inspired Approaches for Humanoid Robot Benchmarking: Conceptualizing Tests, Protocols and Analyses10.3389/fnbot.2018.00021 ↗
23. Human stance control beyond steady state response and inverted pendulum simplification10.1007/s00221-007-1189-4 ↗
24. Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations10.1152/jn.1986.55.6.1369 ↗
25. Visual contribution to human standing balance during support surface tilts10.1016/j.humov.2015.02.010 ↗
26. Posture Control in Vestibular-Loss Patients10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03722.x ↗
27. Prediction in the context of a human-inspired posture control model10.1016/j.robot.2018.05.012 ↗
28. Human hip–ankle coordination emerging from multisensory feedback control10.1016/j.humov.2014.07.004 ↗
29. The matryoshka dolls principle in human dynamic behavior in space: A theory of linked references for multisensory perception and control of action
30. Lippi, V., Mergner, T., Szumowski, M., Zurawska, M.S., and Zielińska, T. (2016). Human-inspired humanoid balancing and posture control in frontal plane. Symposium on Robot Design, Dynamics and Control, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-33714-2_32 ↗
31. Ugur, E., Oztop, E., Morimoto, J., and Ishii, S. (2013). A bio-inspired modular system for humanoid posture control. Proceedings of IROS 2013 Workshop on Neuroscience and Robotics, Tokyo, Japan, 3 November 2013, Towards a Robot-Enabled, Neuroscience-Guided Healthy Society.
32. Lippi, V., and Mergner, T. (2017). Human-Derived Disturbance Estimation and Compensation (DEC) Method Lends Itself to a Modular Sensorimotor Control in a Humanoid Robot. Front. Neurorobotics, 11.10.3389/fnbot.2017.00049 ↗
33. Lippi, V., and Molinari, F. (2020, January 7–9). Lyapunov Stability of a Nonlinear Bio-inspired System for the Control of Humanoid Balance. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Online Streaming.10.5220/0009970307260733 ↗
34. Hettich, G., Lippi, V., and Mergner, T. (2013, January 18–20). Human-like Sensor Fusion Mechanisms in a Postural Control Robot. Proceedings of the NEUROTECHNIX, Vilamoura, Portugal.
35. Hettich, G., Lippi, V., and Mergner, T. (2015). Human-like sensor fusion implemented in the posture control of a bipedal robot. Neurotechnology, Electronics, and Informatics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-15997-3_3 ↗
36. Zielinska, T., Gao, Z., Zurawska, M., Zheng, Q., Mergner, T., and Lippi, V. (2017, January 3–5). Postural balance using a disturbance rejection method. Proceedings of the 2017 11th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control (RoMoCo), Wąsowo Palace, Poland.10.1109/RoMoCo.2017.8003888 ↗
37. Manuelli, L., and Tedrake, R. (2016, January 9–14). Localizing external contact using proprioceptive sensors: The Contact Particle Filter. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Daejeon, Korea.10.1109/IROS.2016.7759743 ↗
38. Towards compliant and wearable robotic orthoses: A review of current and emerging actuator technologies10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.01.010 ↗
39. Kazerooni, H., Racine, J., Huang, L., and Stenger, R. (2005, January 18–22). On the control of the berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain.
40. A Human--Exoskeleton Interface Utilizing Electromyography10.1109/TRO.2008.926860 ↗
41. Marcheschi, S., Salsedo, F., Fontana, M., and Bergamasco, M. (2011, January 9–13). Body extender: Whole body exoskeleton for human power augmentation. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980132 ↗
42. Robotic exoskeletons for reengaging in everyday activities: promises, pitfalls, and opportunities10.1080/09638288.2017.1398786 ↗