journal article·2020-06-25Open access

Listeners Sensitivity to Different Locations of Diffusive Surfaces in Performance Spaces: The Case of a Shoebox Concert Hall

Louena Shtrepi, Sonja Di Blasio, Arianna Astolfi

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 12

Abstract

Diffusive surfaces are considered as one of the most challenging aspects to deal with in the acoustic design of concert halls. However, the acoustic effects that these surface locations have on the objective acoustic parameters and on sound perception have not yet been fully understood. Therefore, the effects of these surfaces on the acoustic design parameters have been investigated in a real shoebox concert hall with variable acoustics (Espace de Projection, IRCAM, Paris, France). Acoustic measurements have been carried out in six hall configurations by varying the location of the diffusive surfaces over the front, mid, and rear part of the lateral walls, while the other surfaces have been maintained absorptive or reflective. Moreover, two reference conditions, that is, fully absorptive and reflective boundaries of the hall have been tested. Measurements have been carried out at different positions in the hall, using an artificial head and an array of omnidirectional microphones. Conventional ISO 3382 objective acoustic parameters have been evaluated in all conditions. The results showed that the values of these parameters do not vary significantly with the diffusive surface location. Moreover, a subjective investigation performed by using the ABX method with auralizations at two listening positions revealed that listeners are not sensitive to the diffusive surface location variations even when front-rear asymmetric conditions are compared. However, some of them reported perceived differences relying on reverberance, coloration, and spaciousness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Noise Effects and Management · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy

Funding

Politecnico di Torino

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Beranek, L. (1996). Concert Halls and Opera Houses: How They Sound, Acoustical Society of America.
2. An evaluation of the importance of surface diffusivity in concert halls10.1016/S0003-682X(96)00060-6 ↗
3. Cox, T., and D’Antonio, P. (2007). Acoustic Absorbers and Diffusers. Theory, Design and Application, CRC Press.
4. Subjective and objective evaluations of a scattered sound field in a scale model opera house10.1121/1.2956474 ↗
5. A theoretical framework for quantitatively characterizing sound field diffusion based on scattering coefficient and absorption coefficient of walls10.1121/1.3463802 ↗
6. Acoustical remodeling of a large fan-type auditorium to enhance sound strength and spatial responsiveness for symphonic music10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.04.008 ↗
7. Objective and perceptual evaluation of distance-dependent scattered sound effects in a small variable-acoustics hall10.1121/1.4966267 ↗
8. Preferred positions for solo, duet, and quartet performers on stage in concert halls: In situ experiment with acoustic measurements10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.010 ↗
9. Scale Model Investigations of Diffuser Application Strategies for Acoustical Design of Performance Venues10.3813/AAA.918459 ↗
10. Engaging concert hall acoustics is made up of temporal envelope preserving reflections10.1121/1.3579145 ↗
11. The role of diffusive architectural surfaces on auditory spatial discrimination in performance venues10.1121/1.4803846 ↗
12. Jeon, J.Y., Jo, H.I., Seo, R., and Kwak, K.H. (2020). Objective and subjective assessment of sound diffuseness in musical venues via computer simulations and a scale model. Build. Environ., 173.10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106740 ↗
13. Investigation on the diffusive surface modeling detail in geometrical acoustics based simulations10.1121/1.5092821 ↗
14. Shtrepi, L., Astolfi, A., Puglisi, G.E., and Masoero, M. (2017). Effects of the Distance from a Diffusive Surface on the Objective and Perceptual Evaluation of the Sound Field in a Small Simulated Variable-Acoustics Hall. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7030224 ↗
15. Objective and perceptual assessment of the scattered sound field in a simulated concert hall10.1121/1.4929743 ↗
16. The Influence of a Volume Scale-Factor on Scattering Coefficient Effects in Room Acoustics10.1260/1351-010X.21.2.153 ↗
17. ISO3382-1 (2009). Acoustics-Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters-Part 1: Performance of Spaces, International Standards Organization.
18. Wall diffuser designs for acoustical renovation of small performing spaces10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.01.003 ↗
19. Influence of wall scattering on the early fine structures of measured room impulse responses10.1121/1.4913773 ↗
20. Audibility of “Diffusion” in room acoustics auralization: An initial investigation
21. Sound Fields and Subjective Effects of Scattering by Periodic-Type Diffusers10.1006/jsvi.2002.5271 ↗
22. Individual subjective diffuseness responses of filtered noise sound fields
23. Vitale, R. (2015). Perceptual Aspects of Sound Scattering in Concert Halls. [Ph.D. Thesis, Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH].
24. ISO17497-1 (2004). Acoustics-Measurement of Sound Scattering Properties of Surfaces. Part 1: Measurement of the Random-Incidence Scattering Coefficient in a Reverberation Room, International Standards Organization.
25. ISO17497-2 (2012). Acoustics-Sound-Scattering Properties of Surfaces. Part 2: Measurement of the Directional Diffusion Coefficient in a Free Field, International Standards Organization.
26. Accuracy of the random-incidence scattering coefficient measurement10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.12.021 ↗
27. Nouvelle examen des theories de reverberation
28. Peutz, V. (1978, January 28). The Variable Acoustics of the Espace de Projection of Ircam (Paris). Proceedings of the 59th International Audio Engineering Society Convention, Hamburg, Germany.
29. (2020, May 26). ITA TOOLBOX. Available online: http://www.ita-toolbox.org/.
30. Farina, A. (2000, January 19–22). Simultaneous measurement of impulse response and distortion with a swept-sine technique. Proceedings of the 108th International Audio Engineering Society Convention, Paris, France.
31. Boley, J., and Lester, M. (2009, January 9–12). Statistical analysis of ABX results using signal detection theory. Proceedings of the 127th International Audio Engineering Society Convention, New York, NY, USA.
32. (2020, May 26). JPSB Software. Available online: https://download.cnet.com/developer/jpsb-software/i-10273146.
33. (2020, June 16). Listening Test Database. Available online: https://zenodo.org/record/3893723#.XvLSjcARWMo.
34. Sigel, S., and Castellan, N.J. (1988). Non Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill. [2nd ed.].
35. High-resolution subjective testing using a double-blind comparator
36. Ando, Y. (1985). Concert Hall Acoustics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-69810-1 ↗
37. The autocorrelation-based analysis as a tool of sound perception in a reverberant field
38. Pätynen, J., Tervo, S., and Lokki, T. (2008, January 3–5). A loudspeaker orchestra for concert hall studies. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Auditorium Acoustics, Oslo, Norway.
39. Anechoic recordings of Italian opera played by orchestra, choir, and soloists10.1121/10.0000739 ↗
40. Head movements made by listeners in experimental and real-life listening activities
41. Localization using non individualized head–related transfer functions10.1121/1.407089 ↗
42. Richter, J.-G., Behler, G., and Fels, J. (2016, January 4–7). Evaluation of a Fast HRTF measurement system. Proceedings of the 140th International Audio Engineering Society Convention, Paris, France.
43. The just noticeable difference of center time and clarity index in large reverberant spaces10.1121/1.3455837 ↗
44. Subjective evaluation of music hall acoustics: Response of expert and non-expert users10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.008 ↗
45. The aesthetics of the Bayreuth Festspielhaus explained by means of acoustic measurements and simulations10.1016/j.culher.2018.03.003 ↗