journal article·2017-03-24Open access

Analyses of the Effect of Cycle Inlet Temperature on the Precooler and Plant Efficiency of the Simple and Intercooled Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants

Arnold Gad-Briggs, Theoklis Nikolaidis, Pericles Pilidis

Applied Sciences· Volume 7· Issue 4

Abstract

Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) precooler coolant temperature is critical to performance because it impacts the work required to increase the coolant pressure. Variation of the coolant temperature results in varied precooler hot gas temperatures, which are cooled before re-entry. For recirculation, the heat sink (usually sea water), could exit the precooler at unfavourable temperatures and impact the re-entering coolant, if not recirculated properly at the source. The study objective is to analyse the effects of coolant inlet temperature on the heat sink and cycle efficiency. The cycles are Simple Cycle Recuperated (SCR), Intercooler Cycle Recuperated (ICR), and Intercooled Cycle without Recuperation (IC). Results show that the co-current precooler provides favourable outlet heat sink temperatures but compromises compactness. For a similar technology level, the counter-current precooler yields excessive heat sink outlet temperatures due to a compact, robust, and efficient heat transfer design, but could be detrimental to precooler integrity due to corrosion, including the cycle performance, if not recirculated back into the sea effectively. For the counter-current, the ICR has the best heat sink average temperature ratio of 1.4; the SCR has 2.7 and IC has 3.3. The analyses aid the development of Gas Cooled Fast Reactors (GFRs) and Very High Temperature Reactors (VHTRs), where helium is used as the coolant.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies · Heat transfer and supercritical fluids

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Gas Turbine Engineering Group, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 OAL, UK

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Analyses of Simple and Intercooled Recuperated Direct Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Reactor Power Plants
2. Generation IV nuclear reactors: Current status and future prospects10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.101 ↗
3. A Review of The Turbine Cooling Fraction for Very High Turbine Entry Temperature Helium Gas Turbine Cycles For Generation IV Reactor Power Plants
4. Pradeepkumar, K.N., Tourlidakis, A., and Pilidis, P. (2001). Analysis of 115 MW, 3-Shaft, Helium Brayton Cycle using Nuclear Heat Source. Proc. ASME.10.1115/2001-GT-0523 ↗
5. Pradeepkumar, K.N., Tourlidakis, A., and Pilidis, P. (2001, January 4–7). Design and Performance review of PBMR Closed Cycle Gas Turbine Plant in South Africa. Proceedings of the International Joint Power Generation Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA.
6. Pradeepkumar, K.N., Tourlidakis, A., and Pilidis, P. (2000, January 14–16). Performance Review: PBMR Closed Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plant. Proceedings of the Technical Committee Meeting on HTGR-Power Conversion Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
7. Kulhanek, M., and Dostal, V. (2007). Thermodynamic Analysis and Comparison, Czech Technical University Prague.
8. Evaluation of alternate power conversion unit designs for the GT-MHR10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.12.021 ↗
9. Analyses of a High Pressure Ratio Intercooled Direct Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycle for Generation IV Reactor Power Plants
10. Al-Busaidi, W., and Pilidis, P. (2015). An Approach to Evaluate The Heat Exchanger Retrofit for Installed Industrial Gas Turbines: Part I–Technical Evaluation. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., 4.10.1115/GT2016-56145 ↗
11. Al-Busaidi, W., and Pilidis, P. (2016, January 13–17). A Method To Evaluate The Heat Exchanger Retrofit For Industrial Gas Turbines Based on Technical and Economic Perspective. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition GT2016, Seoul, Korea.10.1115/GT2016-56145 ↗
12. GTHTR300—A nuclear power plant design with 50% generating efficiency10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.05.004 ↗
13. Pitts, D.R., and Sissom, L.E. (1997). Theory and Problems of Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill. [2nd ed.].
14. Yeh, F.C., Gladden, H.J., and Gauntner, J.W. (1972). Comparison of Heat Transer Characteristics of Three Cooling Configurations for Air Cooled Turbine Vanes Tested in a Turbojet Engine, NASA Lewis Research Center.
15. Esgar, J.B., Colladay, R.S., and Kaufman, A. (1970). An Analysis of the Capabilities and Limitations of Turbine Air Cooling Methods, NASA Lewis Research Center.
16. Meitner, P.L. (1978). Analysis of Metal Temperature and Coolant Flow with a Thermal Barrier Coating on Full-Coverage Film-Cooled Turbine Vane, NASA Lewis Research Center.
17. Han, J.C., Dutta, S., and Ekkad, S. (2000). Gas Turbine Heat Transfer and Cooling Technology, Tayolr and Francis.
18. Decher, R. (1994). Energy Conversion, Systems, Flow Physics and Engineering, Oxford Univesity Press.