Gradient Descent-Based Optimization Method of a Four-Bar Mechanism Using Fully Cartesian Coordinates
Source abstract
Abstract
Machine vibrations often occur due to dynamic unbalance inducing wear, fatigue, and noise that limit the potential of many machines. Dynamic balancing is a main concern in mechanism and machine theory as it allows designers to limit the transmission of vibrations to the frames and base of machines. This work introduces a novel method for representing a four-bar mechanism with the use of Fully Cartesian coordinates and a simple definition of the shaking force (ShF) and the shaking moment (ShM) equations. A simplified version of Projected Gradient Descent is used to minimize the ShF and ShM functions with the aim of balancing the system. The multi-objective optimization problem was solved using a linear combination of the objectives. A comprehensive analysis of the partial derivatives, volumes, and relations between area and thickness of the counterweights is used to define whether the allowed optimization boundaries should be changed in case the mechanical conditions of the mechanism permit it. A comparison between Pareto fronts is used to determine the impact that each counterweight has on the mechanism’s balancing. In this way, it is possible to determine which counterweights can be eliminated according to the importance of the static balance (ShF), dynamic balance (ShM), or both. The results of this methodology when using three counterweights reduces the ShF and ShM by 99.70% and 28.69%, respectively when importance is given to the static balancing and by 83.99% and 8.47%, respectively, when importance is focused on dynamic balancing. Even when further reducing the number of counterweights, the ShF and ShM can be decreased satisfactorily.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Josemaría Escrivá de Balaguer 101, Aguascalientes 20290, Mexico
INFOTEC—Centro de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación, Aguascalientes 20313, Mexico
Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, Guanajuato 36023, Mexico
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Álvaro del Portillo 49, Zapopan, JAL 45010, Mexico
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Martini, A., Troncossi, M., and Rivola, A. (2013). Elastodynamic effects of mass-balancing: Experimental investigation of a four-bar linkage. Adv. Mech. Eng., 2013.10.1155/2013/949457 ↗
2. Reconfiguration of a four-bar mechanism using phase space connections10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.03.024 ↗
3. Arakelian, V., Dahan, M., and Smith, M. (2000). A Historical Review of the Evolution of the Theory on Balancing of Mechanisms. International Symposium on History of Machines and Mechanisms Proceedings HMM 2000, Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-9554-4_33 ↗
4. Shaking Force and Shaking Moment Balancing of Mechanisms: A Historical Review With New Examples10.1115/1.1829067 ↗
5. Balancing of linkages—An update10.1016/0094-114X(83)90092-7 ↗
6. Arakelian, V., and Briot, S. (2015). Balancing of Linkages and Robot Manipulators, Springer International Publishing. Mechanisms and Machine Science.10.1007/978-3-319-12490-2 ↗
7. Twenty-five years of natural coordinates10.1007/s11044-007-9068-0 ↗
8. Computer method for kinematic analysis of lower-pair mechanisms—I velocities and accelerations10.1016/0094-114X(81)90026-4 ↗
9. De Jalon, J.G., and Bayo, E. (1994). Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real-Time Challenge, Springer.
10. Optimal dynamic balancing and shape synthesis of links in planar mechanisms10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.07.006 ↗
11. Minimum RMS shaking moment or driving torque of a force-balanced 4-bar linkage using feasible counterweights10.1016/0094-114X(81)90034-3 ↗
12. The Theory of Torque, Shaking Force, and Shaking Moment Balancing of Four Link Mechanisms10.1115/1.3439303 ↗
13. Momentum Balancing of Four-Bar Linkages10.1115/1.3439102 ↗
14. Shaking Force Optimization of Four-Bar Linkage With Adjustable Constraints on Ground Bearing Forces10.1115/1.3438629 ↗
15. Determination of Force-Balanced Four-Bar Linkages With Optimum Shaking Moment Characteristics10.1115/1.3427915 ↗
16. Theory of Shaking Moment Optimization of Force-Balanced Four-Bar Linkages10.1115/1.3427917 ↗
17. Multiobjective optimization for force and moment balance of a four-bar linkage using evolutionary algorithms10.1007/s12206-011-0924-8 ↗
18. Zamuda, A., Brest, J., Boskovic, B., and Zumer, V. (2007, January 25–28). Differential evolution for multiobjective optimization with self adaptation. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Singapore.10.1109/CEC.2007.4424941 ↗
19. Bulatović, R., Bošković, M., Šalinić, S., and Miodragović, G. (2017, January 19–21). Multiobjective optimization for dynamic balancing of four-bar mechanism. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Serbian Society of Mechanics, Mountain Tara, Serbia.
20. Ultimate Limits for Counterweight Balancing of Crank-Rocker Four-Bar Linkages10.1115/1.2337313 ↗
21. Nocedal, J., and Wright, S.J. (2006). Numerical Optimization, Springer.
22. Orvananos-Guerrero, M.T., Sanchez, C.N., Davalos-Orozco, O., Rivera, M., Velazquez, R., and Acevedo, M. (2018, January 7–8). Using Fully Cartesian Coordinates to Calculate the Support Reactions of Multi-Scale Mechanisms. Proceedings of the 2018 Nanotechnology for Instrumentation and Measurement, NANOfIM 2018, Mexico City, Mexico.10.1109/NANOFIM.2018.8688610 ↗
23. Norton, R.L. (2004). Design of Machinery: An Introduction to the Synthesis And Analysis of Mechanisms and Machines, McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
24. The quantitative influence of complete force balancing on the forces and moments of certain families of four-bar linkages10.1016/0094-114X(74)90017-2 ↗
25. Acevedo, M. (2015, January 25–30). Conditions for Dynamic Balancing of Planar Parallel Manipulators Using Natural Coordinates and their Application. Proceedings of the 14th IFToMM World Congress, Taipei, Taiwan.
26. Shaking Moment Balancing of a Four-Bar Mechanism Using Actuation Redundancy10.1007/978-3-030-20131-9_328 ↗
27. Chong, E.K., and Zak, S.H. (2013). An Introduction to Optimization, John Wiley & Sons. [2nd ed.].
28. Khademi, G., Mohammadi, H., and Simon, D. (2019). Gradient-Based Multi-Objective Feature Selection for Gait Mode Recognition of Transfemoral Amputees. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19020253 ↗
29. Wang, Q., Yin, J., Noureldin, A., Iqbal, U., Wang, Q., Yin, J., Noureldin, A., and Iqbal, U. (2018). Research on an Improved Method for Foot-Mounted Inertial/Magnetometer Pedestrian-Positioning Based on the Adaptive Gradient Descent Algorithm. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18124105 ↗
30. Domingo-Perez, F., Lazaro-Galilea, J.L., Bravo, I., Gardel, A., and Rodriguez, D. (2016). Optimization of the Coverage and Accuracy of an Indoor Positioning System with a Variable Number of Sensors. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16060934 ↗
31. A tutorial on multiobjective optimization: Fundamentals and evolutionary methods10.1007/s11047-018-9685-y ↗
32. Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization