Evaluating the Overall Accuracy of Additional Learning and Automatic Classification System for CT Images
Source abstract
Abstract
A large number of images that are usually registered images in a training dataset are required for creating classification models because training of images using a convolutional neural network is done using supervised learning. It takes a significant amount of time and effort to create a registered dataset because recently computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging devices produce hundreds of images per examination. This study aims to evaluate the overall accuracy of the additional learning and automatic classification systems for CT images. The study involved 700 patients, who were subjected to contrast or non-contrast CT examination of brain, neck, chest, abdomen, or pelvis. The images were divided into 500 images per class. The 10-class dataset was prepared with 10 datasets including with 5000–50,000 images. The overall accuracy was calculated using a confusion matrix for evaluating the created models. The highest overall reference accuracy was 0.9033 when the model was trained with a dataset containing 50,000 images. The additional learning for manual training was effective when datasets with a large number of images were used. The additional learning for automatic training requires models with an inherent higher accuracy for the classification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: COVID-19 diagnosis using AI · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Medical Imaging and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition10.1109/5.726791 ↗
2. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012, January 3–6). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
3. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2015, January 7–12). Going deeper with convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
4. Deep Learning at Chest Radiography: Automated Classification of Pulmonary Tuberculosis by Using Convolutional Neural Networks10.1148/radiol.2017162326 ↗
5. Medical image retrieval using deep convolutional neural network10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.025 ↗
6. Classification of CT brain images based on deep learning networks10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.10.007 ↗
7. Computer-Assisted Decision Support System in Pulmonary Cancer detection and stage classification on CT images10.1016/j.jbi.2018.01.005 ↗
8. Agile convolutional neural network for pulmonary nodule classification using CT images10.1007/s11548-017-1696-0 ↗
9. DeepNAT: Deep convolutional neural network for segmenting neuroanatomy10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.035 ↗
10. Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4 ↗
11. Interleaved 3D-CNNs for joint segmentation of small-volume structures in head and neck CT images10.1002/mp.12837 ↗
12. A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI10.1016/j.media.2016.01.005 ↗
13. Classification of Computed Tomography Images in Different Slice Positions Using Deep Learning10.1155/2018/1753480 ↗
14. Improving Arterial Spin Labeling by Using Deep Learning10.1148/radiol.2017171154 ↗
15. Deep Learning MR Imaging–based Attenuation Correction for PET/MR Imaging10.1148/radiol.2017170700 ↗
16. Liver Fibrosis: Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Staging by Using Gadoxetic Acid–enhanced Hepatobiliary Phase MR Images10.1148/radiol.2017171928 ↗
17. Deep Learning to Classify Radiology Free-Text Reports10.1148/radiol.2017171115 ↗
18. Improvement of Generalization Ability of Deep CNN via Implicit Regularization in Two-Stage Training Process10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2810849 ↗
19. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (2015, January 7–12). Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
20. Lin, M., Chen, Q., and Yan, S. (arXiv, 2013). Network in Network, arXiv.
21. Relationship between Hounsfield unit in CT scan and gray scale in CBCT10.1063/1.4968860 ↗