Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Nutritive Value and In Vitro Ruminal Digestibility of Maize and Rice Straw Silage
Source abstract
Abstract
A study was conducted to determine the effects of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on nutritive value and in vitro rumen digestibility of maize and rice straw silages. Two identical experiments were carried out for each of the two silages. A total of five treatments were used for each experiment: (1) negative control (NC); (2) positive control (PC); (3) Lactobacillus plantarum (LPL); (4) L. paracasei (LPA); and (5) L. acidophilus (LA). Each treatment was then divided into four ensiling periods: 3, 7, 20, and 40 days with three replications. The LPL treatment had significantly higher dry matter (DM), lower ammonia-N, and a lower number of fungi on maize silage after 40 days (p < 0.05). On the other hand, the LA treatment increased DM and CP content, reduced NDF and ADF contents compared to NC, and also produced more lactic acid compared to the other LAB-treated rice straw silages. Results of the in vitro rumen fermentation of maize silages showed no significant differences in DMD after LAB inoculation. However, higher DMD and ruminal ammonia-N were shown by rice straw ensiled with L. acidophilus. In conclusion, silage additives, which could improve the ensiling process of maize and rice straw, appeared to be different and substrate specific.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology · Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems · Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Korea
Genebiotech Co., Ltd., 166 Sinwonsa-ro, Gyeryong-myeon, Gongju 32619, Korea
Circulation Agriculture Livestock Solution Inc., Sangju 37224, Korea
Funding
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the Research and Development for Regional Industry
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Metabolic components of energy expenditure in growing beef cattle-review10.5713/ajas.2000.702 ↗
2. Effect of dietary energy on milk production and metabolic hormones in thin, primiparous beef heifers10.2527/2000.783530x ↗
3. Winter damage to perennial forage crops in eastern Canada: Causes, mitigation, and prediction10.4141/P04-171 ↗
4. Silage additives10.1016/0377-8401(93)90070-Z ↗
5. Effect of formic acid and a bacterial inoculant on the amino acid composition of grass silage and on animal performance10.1046/j.1365-2494.2001.00265.x ↗
6. Fermentation quality and chemical composition of shrub silage treated with lactic acid bacteria inoculants and cellulase additives10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00962.x ↗
7. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus plantarum on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and ruminal degradability of low dry matter corn and sorghum silages10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73963-0 ↗
8. Lactobacillus plantarum effects on silage fermentation and in vitro microbial yield10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.11.008 ↗
9. Microbial inoculant effects on silage and in vitro ruminal fermentation, and microbial biomass estimation for alfalfa, bmr corn, and corn silages10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.09.015 ↗
10. The effects of lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation, aerobic stability and nutritive value of maize silage10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00763.x ↗
11. Selection of tropical lactic acid bacteria for enhancing the quality of maize silage10.3168/jds.2013-6782 ↗
12. Intake, digestibility and aerobic stability of barley silage inoculated with mixtures of Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium10.4141/cjas95-062 ↗
13. Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security10.1007/s12571-011-0140-5 ↗
14. The effect of a lactic acid bacterial inoculant on maize silage10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00066-7 ↗
15. The effect on milk production of replacing grass silage with maize silage in the diet of dairy cows10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00115-8 ↗
16. Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality10.1002/jsfa.6703 ↗
17. Effects of silage pH on voluntary intake of corn silage and alfalfa haylage10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80830-4 ↗
18. Review article: The alkali treatment of straws10.1016/0377-8401(77)90013-X ↗
19. Influence of Lactobacillus spp. from an inoculant and of Weissella and Leuconostoc spp. from forage crops on silage fermentation10.1128/AEM.64.8.2982-2987.1998 ↗
20. Why do farmers burn rice residue? Examining farmers’ choices in Punjab, Pakistan10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.004 ↗
21. The effect of a diet based on rice straw co-fermented with probiotics and enzymes versus a fresh corn Stover-based diet on the rumen bacterial community and metabolites of beef cattle
22. Effect of pretreatment and pelletization on nutritive value of rice straw-based total mixed ration, and growth performance and meat quality of growing Boer goats fed on TMR10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.02.010 ↗
23. AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis, AOAC International. [18th ed.].
24. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 ↗
25. Influence of inoculating forage with lactic acid bacterial strains that produce ferulate esterase on ensilage and ruminal degradation of fiber10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.039 ↗
26. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130 ↗
27. Determination of volatile carboxylic acids (C1–C5i) and lactic acid in aqueous acid extracts of silage by high performance liquid chromatography10.1002/jsfa.2740351106 ↗
28. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75263-X ↗
29. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus plantarum, or a chemical preservative on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage 110.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74912-5 ↗
30. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x ↗
31. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva10.1042/bj0430099 ↗
32. Anaerobic lactic acid degradation during ensilage of whole crop maize inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri inhibits yeast growth and improves aerobic stability10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00856.x ↗
33. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00253.x ↗
34. A meta-analysis examining lactic acid bacteria inoculants for maize silage: Effects on fermentation, aerobic stability, nutritive value and livestock production10.1111/gfs.12452 ↗
35. Enzyme, bacterial inoculant, and formic acid effects on silage composition of orchardgrass and alfalfa10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75021-1 ↗
36. The effect of adding an enzyme containing lactic acid bacterial inoculant to big round bale oat silage on intake, milk production and milk composition of Jersey cows10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00352-2 ↗
37. Nutritive value and aerobic stability of whole crop maize silage harvested at four stages of maturity10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.06.003 ↗
38. Changes in the cell wall components of laboratory silages and the effect of various additives on these changes10.1017/S0021859600038983 ↗
39. The effect of homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on conservation characteristics of baled triticale–Hungarian vetch silage and lamb performance10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.11.017 ↗
40. Silage additives
41. Carbohydrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria10.1007/BF00399499 ↗
42. Effect of applying molasses or inoculants containing homofermentative or heterofermentative bacteria at two rates on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage10.3168/jds.2008-1546 ↗
43. Inoculant effects on alfalfa silage: In vitro gas and volatile fatty acid production10.3168/jds.2006-878 ↗
44. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on in vitro digestibility of wheat and corn silages10.3168/jds.2007-0176 ↗
45. Drake, D.J., Nader, G., and Forero, L. (2002). Feeding rice straw to cattle. ANR UC Davis, ANR.10.3733/ucanr.8079 ↗
46. Effect of urea treatment and diet composition on, and prediction of nutritive value of rice straw of different cultivars10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00045-X ↗
47. Improvement of fermentation quality of rice straw silage by application of a bacterial inoculant and glucose10.5713/ajas.2010.90403 ↗
48. Rice straw fermentation using lactic acid bacteria10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.001 ↗
49. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and urea treatment on fermentation quality, digestibility and ruminal fermentation of roll bale rice straw silage in wethers10.1111/j.1744-697X.2012.00244.x ↗
50. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation for improving in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of cereal straws10.1080/1828051X.2016.1262753 ↗
51. Effect of carbohydrate limitation on degradation and utilization of casein by mixed rumen bacteria10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)81856-6 ↗
52. Kolver, E., Roche, J., Miller, D., and Densley, R. (2001). Maize silage for dairy cows. Proceedings of the Conference-New Zealand Grassland Association, Wellington, New Zealand Grassland Association.10.33584/jnzg.2001.63.2407 ↗
53. Nutritional improvement of maize silage for dairying: Mixed crop silages from sole and intercropped legumes and a long season variety of maize. 2. Ensilage10.1016/S0377-8401(97)81640-9 ↗
54. Forage quality variation among maize inbreds: Relationships of cell-wall composition and in-vitro degradability for stem internodes10.1002/jsfa.2740660308 ↗
55. Variation in the nutritional value of rice straw10.1016/0377-8401(91)90116-A ↗
56. Varietal differences in the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of rice straw10.1017/S0021859600071513 ↗
57. Genetic variation in the feeding value of cereal straw10.1016/0377-8401(88)90095-8 ↗