IMPAβ: Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis for Bridges
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present study, the incremental modal pushover analysis (IMPA), a pushover-based approach already proposed and applied to buildings by the same authors, was revised and proposed for bridges (IMPAβ). Pushover analysis considers the effects of higher modes on the structural response. Bridges are structurally very different from multi-story buildings, where multimodal pushover (MPA) has been developed and is currently used. In bridges, consideration for higher modes is often necessary: The responses of some structural elements of the bridge (e.g., piers) influence the overall bridge response. Therefore, the failure of these elements can determine the failure of the whole structure, even if they give a small contribution total base shear. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) requires input accelerograms for high intensities, which are rare in the databases, while scaling of generated accelerograms with a simple increment of the scaling acceleration is not appropriate. This fact renders IDA, which is by its nature time-consuming, not straightforward. On the contrary, the change of input spectrum required by IMPA is simple. IMPAβ also utilizes a simple complementary method coupled to MPA, to obtain bounds at very high seismic intensities. Finally, the two incremental methods based on static nonlinear and dynamic nonlinear analyses are compared.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Architecture, Roma Tre University, 00152 Rome, Italy
College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. FEMA-356 (2000). Applied Technology Council (Report no 40), Applied Technology Council (ATC).
2. ATC, Applied Technology Council (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, ATC. ATC 40 Report.
3. Incremental dynamic analysis10.1002/eqe.141 ↗
4. Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multi-degree of freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:4(589) ↗
5. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design10.1193/1.1586128 ↗
6. Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure10.1080/13632460409350504 ↗
7. Using nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of the 3D irregular SPEAR building10.12989/eas.2010.1.2.177 ↗
8. Assessing the seismic response of existing RC buildings using the extended N2 method10.1007/s10518-011-9252-8 ↗
9. Extension of the CSM-FEMA440 to plan-asymmetric real building structures10.1002/eqe.1087 ↗
10. Kappos, A.J., Saiidi, M.S., Aydınoğlu, M.N., and Isaković, T. (2012). Seismic Design and Assessment of Bridges: Inelastic Methods of Analysis and Case Studies, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-94-007-3943-7 ↗
11. A comparison of single-run pushover analysis techniques for seismic assessment of bridges10.1002/eqe.684 ↗
12. A modal pushover analysis on multi-span concrete bridges to estimate inelastic seismic responses
13. Kappos, A.J., Goutzika, E.D., Stefanidou, S.P., and Sextos, A.G. (2010). Problems in pushover analysis of bridges sensitive to torsion. Computational Methods in Earthquake Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-0053-6_5 ↗
14. Kappos, A.J., and Paraskeva, T.S. (2008). Nonlinear static analysis of bridges accounting for higher mode effects. Workshop on Nonlinear Static Methods for Design/Assessment of 3D Structures, Springer.
15. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings10.1193/1.1646390 ↗
16. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings10.1002/eqe.144 ↗
17. Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure10.1002/eqe.605 ↗
18. Fajfar, P., Marusic, D., and Perus, I. The extension of the N2 method to asymmetric buildings, In Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on the Seismic Behaviour of Irregular and Complex Structures, Thessaloniki, Greece, 26–27 August 2005.
19. Bergami, A.V., Nuti, C., and Liu, X. (2015, January 23–25). Proposal and application of the Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA). Proceedings of the IABSE Conference, Geneva 2015: Structural Engineering: Providing Solutions to Global Challenges—Report, Geneva, Switzerland.10.2749/222137815818359104 ↗
20. Bergami, A.V., Forte, A., Lavorato, D., and Nuti, C. (2017). Proposal of an Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA), Techno Press. Earthquake & Structures.
21. Bergami, A.V., and Nuti, C. (2013). A Design Procedure of Dissipative Braces for Seismic Upgrading Structures, Techno Press. Earthquake & Structures.10.12989/eas.2013.4.1.085 ↗
22. Bergami, A.V., Forte, A., Lavorato, D., and Nuti, C. (2016, January 27–28). Non-linear static analysis: Application of existing concrete building. Proceedings of the Italian Concrete Days, Rome, Italy.
23. The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis10.1080/13632460409350521 ↗
24. Calvi, G.M., and Priestley, M.J.N. (1991, January 2–5). Seismic design and retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridges. Proceedings of the International Workshop, LitoLine Arti Grafiche, Pavia.
25. European Committee for Standardization (2005). Eurocode 8—Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization.
26. European Committee for Standardization (2005). Eurocode 8—Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 2: Bridges, European Committee for Standardization.
27. Higher modes in simplified inelastic seismic analysis of single column bent viaducts10.1002/eqe.535 ↗
28. Applicability of pushover methods for the seismic analysis of single-column bent viaducts10.1002/eqe.813 ↗
29. Extension of modal pushover analysis to seismic assessment of bridges10.1002/eqe.582 ↗
30. Further development of a multimodal pushover analysis procedure for seismic assessment of bridges10.1002/eqe.947 ↗
31. Paraskeva, T.S., and Kappos, A.J. (2008, January 16–17). Seismic assessment of complex bridges using an improved modal pushover analysis procedure. Proceedings of the Fifth European Workshop on the Seismic Behaviour of Irregular and Complex Structures, Catania, Italy.
32. A multimode adaptive pushover procedure for seismic assessment of integral bridges
33. Bridges: When is single mode seismic analysis adequate?10.1680/stbu.2003.156.2.165 ↗
34. (2020, June 22). Decreto 17 gennaio 2018 Aggiornamento delle «Norme tecniche per le costruzioni». (18A00716) (GU Serie Generale n.42 del 20-02-2018—Suppl. Ordinario n. 8). In Italian. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/gu/2018/02/20/42/so/8/sg/pdf.
35. Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bi-directional loading: A review of current practice and code provisions10.1080/13632460701280013 ↗
36. Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state of the art review from a structural perspective10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.005 ↗
37. REXEL: Computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1 ↗
38. Computers and Structures Inc. (2005). SAP2000 Nonlinear Version 10 (2005) User’s Reference Manual, Computers and Structures Inc.
39. Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
40. Forte, A., Santini, S., Fiorentino, G., Lavorato, D., Bergami, A.V., and Nuti, C. (2018, January 29–31). Influence of materials knowledge level on the assessment of the shear strength characteristic value of existing RC beams. Proceedings of the 12th FIB International PhD Symposium in Civ. Engineering, Prague, Czech Republic.
41. Lavorato, D., Fiorentino, G., Bergami, A.V., Ma, H.-B., Nuti, C., Briseghella, B., Vanzi, I., and Zhou, W. (2017, January 15–17). Surface generation of asynchronous seismic signals for the seismic response analysis of bridges. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rhodes Island, Greece.10.7712/120117.5560.18098 ↗
42. Lavorato, D., Bergami, A.V., Rago, C., Ma, H.-B., Nuti, C., Vanzi, I., Briseghella, B., and Zhuo, W.-D. (2017, January 15–17). Seismic behaviour of isolated RC bridges subjected to asynchronous seismic input. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rhodes Island, Greece.10.7712/120117.5561.18104 ↗
43. Lavorato, D., Fiorentino, G., Pelle, A., Rasulo, A., Bergami, A.V., Briseghella, B., and Nuti, C. (2019). A corrosion model for the interpretation of cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete sections. Struct. Concr., 1–15.10.1002/suco.201900232 ↗
44. Equivalent viscous damping of bilinear hysteretic oscillators10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001262 ↗
45. Aviram, A., Mackie, K.R., and Stojadinović, B. (2008). Guidelines for Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures in California, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California. Report No. UCB/PEER 2008/03.