Hierarchy-Based Competency Structure and Its Application in E-Evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of information technologies changes the learning process. The amount of publicly available data of e-learning systems allows personalized studies. Therefore, the tutor sometimes is needed for the student’s evaluation and consultation only. To ensure clear evaluation requirements and objective evaluation process, the learning material, as well as the evaluation system, must be discrete and semantically expressed. The list of mastered competencies and skills is more important to the enterprise; therefore, during the last years, the study process has concentrated on competency evaluation too. However, the current practice, when students’ competencies are summarized and expressed as one quantitative metric (score), do not express the list of students’ competencies and their level. To solve the problem, in this paper, we proposed a method for the design of competencies’ tree. The competency tree has to be formatted based on context modeling principles and analysis of Scope-Commonality-Variability. The usage of competency tree for students’ competencies’ evaluation proposes clearly defined and semantically expressed evaluation method for both human and e-learning evaluation process. This paper presents the results of the empirical experiment to adapt the proposed competency tree design and application for competencies’ e-evaluation method, based on flexibility, adaptability, and granularity of learning material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Online Learning and Analytics · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Information Technologies, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
Department of Information Systems, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Kokybės vadybos taikymo aukštosiose mokyklose įžvalgos
2. Policy of Higher Education Quality Assurance: Opportunities and Barriers to the Development of Liberal Education in Lithuania
3. Švietimo Politikos Formavimas Ir Įgyvendinimas: Dermės Aspektas
4. Cheung, S.K.S., Kwok, L., Kubota, K., Lee, L.-K., and Tokito, J. (2018). Development of Computer Competence Courses in Seniors—Shift from Learning Space with Computer-Based Activities to Virtual Platform—Case Study. Blended Learning. Enhancing Learning Success, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-94505-7 ↗
5. Problem Based Learning and Students’ Motivation: The Case of an Electronics Laboratory Course
6. Liu, F.-H., and Chen, L.-J. (2018). The Impacts of Competence-Based Marketing Capabilities: Relative Attention, Relationship Learning and Collaboration Development. J. Bus. Ind. Mark.10.1108/JBIM-01-2018-0021 ↗
7. A Novel Adaptive E-Learning Model Based on Big Data by Using Competence-Based Knowledge and Social Learner Activities10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.030 ↗
8. Development and Validation of the Educational Technologist Competencies Survey (ETCS): Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities10.1007/s12528-017-9163-z ↗
9. Learning to Code or Coding to Learn? A Systematic Review10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.005 ↗
10. Experts’ Views on Digital Competence: Commonalities and Differences10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008 ↗
11. A Pilot Competency Matrix for Data Management Skills: A Step toward the Development of Systematic Data Information Literacy Programs
12. A Competency Matrix for Global Oral Health10.1002/j.0022-0337.2015.79.4.tb05891.x ↗
13. (2019, July 26). Programmer Competency Matrix|Sijin Joseph. Available online: https://sijinjoseph.com/programmer-competency-matrix/.
14. Peylo, C., Teiken, W., Rollinger, C.-R., and Gust, H. (2000). An Ontology as Domain Model in a Web-Based Educational System for Prolog. FLAIRS Conference, AAAI Press.
15. Adaptive Learning Environments and E-Learning Standards
16. Fallon, C., and Brown, S. (2002). E-Learning Standards: A Guide to Purchasing, Developing, and Deploying Standards-Conformant E-Learning, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420025330 ↗
17. Chapman-Waterhouse, E., Silva-Fletcher, A., and Whittlestone, K. (2018). The Use of Reusable Learning Objects to Enhance the Delivery of Veterinary Education: A Literature Review. Online Course Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-5472-1.ch093 ↗
18. Managing the Quality of E-Learning Resources in Repositories10.1002/cae.21619 ↗
19. Dondi, C., Moretti, M., and Nascimbeni, F. (2006). Quality of E-Learning: Negotiating a Strategy, Implementing a Policy. Handbook on Quality and Standardisation in E-Learning, Springer.10.1007/3-540-32788-6_3 ↗
20. Evaluation Study of ELGuide: A Framework for Adaptive e-Learning10.1002/cae.21625 ↗
21. From Evaluation to Learning: Some Aspects of Designing a Cyber-University10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.017 ↗
22. ETeacher: Providing Personalized Assistance to e-Learning Students10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.008 ↗
23. A Review on Multi-Label Learning Algorithms10.1109/TKDE.2013.39 ↗
24. An Application of Fuzzy AHP for Evaluating Course Website Quality10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.017 ↗
25. Fuzzy User Modeling for Adaptation in Educational Hypermedia10.1109/TSMCC.2004.833294 ↗
26. Chrysafiadi, K., and Virvou, M. (2010). Modeling Student’s Knowledge on Programming Using Fuzzy Techniques. Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems and Services, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-14619-0_3 ↗
27. Skill-Based Education through Fuzzy Knowledge Modeling for e-Learning10.1002/cae.21892 ↗
28. Liang, L., Deng, X., and Liu, Q. (2008). Task-Driven and Objective-Oriented Hierarchical Education Method: A Case Study in Linux Curriculum. 2008 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education, IEEE.10.1109/ITME.2008.4743878 ↗
29. Qvortrup, A., and Rasmussen, H.F. (2017). Learning Objectives as Frameworks and Resources in Upper Secondary Education: Between Means and Aims. Dealing with Conceptualisations of Learning, Brill Sense.10.1007/978-94-6351-029-5_6 ↗
30. Development of Learning Outcome Based E-Portfolio Model Emphasizing on Cognitive Skills in Pedagogical Blended e-Learning Environment for Undergraduate Students at Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.664 ↗
31. The Design, Development, and Implementation of Student-Facing Learning Analytics Dashboards10.1007/s12528-018-9186-0 ↗
32. A Model for Designing Objective-Oriented Training Evaluations10.1108/00197859410051217 ↗
33. Slotkiene, A. (2012, January 25–28). Peculiarities of Applying the Design Method of Active Learning Object. Proceedings of the ITI 2012 34th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, Cavtat, Croatia.
34. Niu, N., and Easterbrook, S. (2009, January 2–6). Concept Analysis for Product Line Requirements. Proceedings of the 8th ACM international conference on Aspect-oriented software development, Charlottesville, VA, USA.10.1145/1509239.1509259 ↗
35. Complexity and Coherency: Integrating Information in the Brain10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01259-5 ↗
36. Progress and New Directions for Teaching and Learning in MOOCs10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.019 ↗
37. The Role of Planning in Complex Problem Solving10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.004 ↗