journal article·2018-06-04Open access

Analytical Modeling for Underground Risk Assessment in Smart Cities

Israr Ullah, Muhammad Fayaz, DoHyeun Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 8· Issue 6

Abstract

In the developed world, underground facilities are increasing day-by-day, as it is considered as an improved utilization of available space in smart cities. Typical facilities include underground railway lines, electricity lines, parking lots, water supply systems, sewerage network, etc. Besides its utility, these facilities also pose serious threats to citizens and property. To preempt accidental loss of precious human lives and properties, a real time monitoring system is highly desirable for conducting risk assessment on continuous basis and timely report any abnormality before its too late. In this paper, we present an analytical formulation to model system behavior for risk analysis and assessment based on various risk contributing factors. Based on proposed analytical model, we have evaluated three approximation techniques for computing final risk index: (a) simple linear approximation based on multiple linear regression analysis; (b) hierarchical fuzzy logic based technique in which related risk factors are combined in a tree like structure; and (c) hybrid approximation approach which is a combination of (a) and (b). Experimental results shows that simple linear approximation fails to accurately estimate final risk index as compared to hierarchical fuzzy logic based system which shows that the latter provides an efficient method for monitoring and forecasting critical issues in the underground facilities and may assist in maintenance efficiency as well. Estimation results based on hybrid approach fails to accurately estimate final risk index. However, hybrid scheme reveals some interesting and detailed information by performing automatic clustering based on location risk index.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Underground infrastructure and sustainability · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computer Engineering Department, Jeju National University, Jeju-si 63243, Korea

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. De Stefano, A. (2014, January 29–30). On-line monitoring and resilient design for a longer construction life. Proceedings of the 46th ESReDA Seminar, Turin, Italy.
2. Approach to environmental risk analysis for the main monuments in a historical city10.1016/j.culher.2013.07.009 ↗
3. (2018, February 12). Designing for Disaster. Available online: http://www.design4disaster.org/.
4. System Modelling Approach Based on Data Acquisition and Analysis for Underground Facility Surveillance10.14257/ijsh.2016.10.3.10 ↗
5. Risk assessment methodology for underground construction projects10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:2(258) ↗
6. Kim, S., Choi, D., and Ahn, C. (2014). Tunnel design underneath the operating runway of Incheon airport. Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Korean Geotechnical Society.
7. Risk and decision analysis for large underground projects, as applied to the Stockholm ring road tunnels10.1016/0886-7798(96)00019-3 ↗
8. Identifying and assessing the critical risk factors in an underground rail project in Thailand: A factor analysis approach10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.004 ↗
9. Risk assessment for infrastructures of urban areas10.1201/b17539-15 ↗
10. The technical and economic conditions for the construction of the central section of metro line II in Warsaw
11. State of the art review of inspection technologies for condition assessment of water pipes10.1016/j.measurement.2012.05.032 ↗
12. Fletcher, R., and Chandrasekaran, M. (2008). SmartBall™: A New Approach in Pipeline Leak Detection. 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/IPC2008-64065 ↗
13. Kong, X., Tang, X., Humphrey, D., Mergelas, B., and Mascarenhas, R. (2010). Live inspection of large diameter PCCP using a free-swimming tool. Pipelines 2010: Climbing New Peaks to Infrastructure Reliability: Renew, Rehab, and Reinvest, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/41138(386)96 ↗
14. Kuttisseril, J., and Kuang, K. (2015). Development of a low-cost image processing technique for crack detection for structural health monitoring. 3rd ASEAN Australian Engineering Congress (AAEC 2015): Australian Engineering Congress on Innovative Technologies for Sustainable Development and Renewable Energy, Engineers Australia.
15. Health monitoring of civil structures with integrated UAV and image processing system10.1016/j.procs.2015.06.058 ↗
16. A scheme for excavation displacement monitoring based on image processing10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.226-228.1923 ↗
17. Adaptive vision-based crack detection using 3D scene reconstruction for condition assessment of structures10.1016/j.autcon.2011.11.018 ↗
18. Qi, D., Liu, Y., Wu, X., and Zhang, Z. (2014, January 27–29). An algorithm to detect the crack in the tunnel based on the image processing. Proceedings of the 2014 Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing (IIH-MSP), Kitakyushu, Japan.10.1109/IIH-MSP.2014.217 ↗
19. Alam, M.A., Ali, M.N., Syed, M.A.A.A., Sorif, N., and Rahaman, M.A. (2014, January 18–20). An algorithm to detect and identify defects of industrial pipes using image processing. Proceedings of the 2014 8th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA), Dhaka, Bangladesh.10.1109/SKIMA.2014.7083567 ↗
20. Image processing and analysis as a diagnostic tool for an underground infrastructure technical condition monitoring10.1201/b17539-6 ↗
21. Knudsen, O.O., Giertsen, E., Schjolberg-Henriksen, P., Ostby, E., Grythe, K., and Oldervoll, F. (2007, January 10–15). SmartPipe: Self Diagnostic Pipelines and Risers. Proceedings of the ASME 2007 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1115/OMAE2007-29485 ↗
22. Schempf, H. (2004). In-Pipe-Assessment Robot Platforms-Phase I-State-Ofthe-Art Review, CMU. Report to National Energy Technology Laboratory REP-GOV-DOE-20041102.
23. Datta, K., and Fraser, D.R. (2009, January 26–29). A corrosion risk assessment model for underground piping. Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Fort Worth, TX, USA.10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914686 ↗
24. Romanoff, M. (1957). Underground corrosion, National Bureau of Standards Circular 579.
25. Prediction of pitting rates in ferrous metals from soil parameters10.1002/j.1551-8833.1969.tb03761.x ↗
26. Kumar, A., Meronyk, E., and Segan, E. (1984). Development of Concepts for Corrosion Assessment and Evaluation of Underground Pipelines, US Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (ARMY). Technical Report.
27. Rajani, B. (2000). Investigation of Grey Cast Iron Water Mains to Develop A Methodology for Estimating Service Life, American Water Works Association.
28. Statistical modeling of pitting corrosion and pipeline reliability10.5006/1.3585090 ↗
29. Ericson, C.A. (2005). Fault tree analysis. Hazard Anal. Tech. Syst. Saf. Wiley Online Library, 183–221.10.1002/0471739421.ch11 ↗
30. Avestedt, L. (2012). Comparison of Risk Assessments for Underground Construction Projects A Study about Distinctions and Common Features and Suggestions for Improvements. [Master’s Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology].
31. Using probability—Impact matrix in analysis and risk assessment projects
32. Awati, K. (2018, January 07). Cox’s Risk Matrix Theorem and Its Implications for Project Risk Management. Available online: https://eight2late.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/cox%E2%80%99s-risk-matrix-theorem-and-its-implications-for-project-risk-management/.
33. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2 ↗
34. Alonso, S.K. (2018, January 13). eMathTeacher: Mamdani’s Fuzzy Inference Method. Available online: http://www.dma.fi.upm.es/recursos/aplicaciones/logica_borrosa/web/fuzzy_inferencia/mamdani_en.htm.