Operation Loop-Based Optimization Model for Resource Allocation to Military Countermeasures versus Probabilistic Threat
Source abstract
Abstract
Weapons development planning is an unstructured and complex multi-criteria decision-making problem, especially in antagonistic environments. In this paper, the defender’s decision was modelled as a high complexity non-linear optimization problem with limited resources. An operation loop with realistic link rules was first proposed to model the cooperation relationships among weapons in the defense system. The system dynamics principle was used to characterize the dynamic behavior of the nodes in a complex weapons network. Then, we used cumulative threat and development risk to measure different planning solutions by considering the opponent and uncertainties in the development process. Next, an improved Differential Evolution (DE) and Non-Dominated Sorting Differential Evolution (NSDE) were designed to determine the optimal planning solutions for a single objective and multi-objective. The compromise solution, based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), was used to evaluate the Pareto solution set of the multi-objective. Finally, an illustrative case was studied to verify the feasibility and validity of the proposed model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Allocating multiple defensive resources in a zero-sum game setting10.1007/s10479-012-1196-0 ↗
2. Optimal resource allocation for defense of targets based on differing measures of attractiveness10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01053.x ↗
3. Etcheson, C. (1989). Arms Race Theory: Strategy and Structure of Behavior, Greenwood Press.
4. Weapon system of systems capability planning model based on expected effectiveness
5. Håkenstad, M., and Larsen, K.K. (2012). Long-Term Defence Planning: A Comparative Study of Seven Countries, Institutt for Forsvarsstudier.
6. Capability requirements oriented weapons portfolio planning model and algorithm
7. Resource allocation in a technology race with temporary advantages10.1002/nav.21477 ↗
8. Mathematical psychology of war10.1038/1361025a0 ↗
9. Mathematical models of a three-nation arms race10.1177/002200278002400203 ↗
10. A game theoretic model for resource allocation among countermeasures with multiple attributes10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.026 ↗
11. A two-resource allocation algorithm with an application to large-scale zero-sum defensive games10.1016/j.cor.2016.08.013 ↗
12. Mazicioglu, D., and Merrick, J.R.W. (2017). Behavioral modeling of adversaries with multiple objectives in counterterrorism. Risk Anal.10.1111/risa.12898 ↗
13. Wan, C., Xiong, W., Ye, Y., Zhao, Q., and Yang, K. (2017, January 24–27). Research on development strategy of weapon equipment in antagonistic environment. Proceedings of the 2017 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (Syscon), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/SYSCON.2017.7934732 ↗
14. Applying the information age combat model: Quantitative analysis of network centric operations
15. Network optimization models for resource allocation in developing military counter measures10.1287/opre.1110.1002 ↗
16. Billiard combat modeling and simulation based on optimal cue placement control and strategic planning10.1007/s10846-011-9639-4 ↗
17. Structural robustness of combat networks of weapon system-of-systems based on the operation loop10.1080/00207721.2016.1212429 ↗
18. Operation network modeling with degenerate causal strengths for missile defense systems
19. Cares, J. (2006). Distributed Networked Operations: The Foundations of Network Centric Warfare, iUniverse.
20. Brehmer, B. (2005, January 13–16). The dynamic OODA loop: Amalgamating boyd’s ooda loop and the cybernetic approach to command and control. Proceedings of the 10th International Command & Control Research & Technology Symposium (ICCRTS), McLean, VA, USA.
21. Research on networked description and modeling methods of armament system-of-systems
22. Zhao, D., Dou, Y., Zhao, Q., and Zhan, W. (2016, January 28–30). The method to evaluate the command and control effectiveness of operational system under uncertain threat situation. Proceedings of the 2016 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Yinchuan, China.
23. Zuo, X., and Qu, Y. (2013, January 25–27). Operational ability evaluation model of the armored weapon system of system. Proceedings of the 2013 25th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Guiyang, China.
24. Armament system of systems contribution evaluation based on operation loop
25. A new synchronization algorithm for delayed complex dynamical networks via adaptive control approach10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.03.022 ↗
26. Differential evolution—A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces10.1023/A:1008202821328 ↗
27. A simple self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm with application on the alstom gasifier10.1016/j.asoc.2006.12.005 ↗
28. Evolutionary algorithms for constrained parameter optimization problems10.1162/evco.1996.4.1.1 ↗
29. Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00323-1 ↗
30. Price, K., Storn, R.M., and Lampinen, J.A. (2005). Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization, Springer.
31. A hybrid approach for multi-weapon production planning with large-dimensional multi-objective in defence manufacturing10.1177/0954405413498728 ↗
32. Brown, M.M. (2011). Acquisition Risks in a World of Joint Capabilities, Naval Postgraduate School. Proceedings Paper.
33. Status quo and prospect of research on technical risk for weapon system development
34. Mun, J. (2006). Modeling Risk, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
35. Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns
36. Pareto, V. (1896). Cours d’Economies Politique, F Rouge.
37. A multi-objective routing algorithm for wireless multimedia sensor networks10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.052 ↗
38. Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221 ↗
39. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., and Meyarivan, T. (2000, January 18–20). A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature, Paris, Prance.10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83 ↗
40. Development of a novel multiple-attribute decision making model via fuzzy cognitive maps and hierarchical fuzzy topsis10.1016/j.ins.2014.12.048 ↗
41. Foreign tank armored vehicle active protection system imtroduction
42. Yang, C.C., and Yang, M.H. (1997, January 12–15). Constraint networks: A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation, Orlando, FL, USA.
43. Kuo, C.C., Liu, C.H., Chang, H.C., and Lin, K.J. (2017). Implementation of a motor diagnosis system for rotor failure using genetic algorithm and fuzzy classification. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7010031 ↗
44. Liang, C., Tong, X., Lei, T., Li, Z., and Wu, G. (2017). Optimal design of an air-to-air heat exchanger with cross-corrugated triangular ducts by using a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7060554 ↗