A Single Gyroscope Can Be Used to Accurately Determine Peak Eversion Velocity during Locomotion at Different Speeds and in Various Shoes
Source abstract
Abstract
Gyroscopes have been used in previous studies to measure the peak angular velocity of the shoe or foot in the frontal plane (evVel). However, it is not clear whether different test conditions (footwear hardness or locomotion speed) can influence the accuracy of evVel. The purpose of the present study was to compare the accuracy of gyroscopes and electrogoniometers when measuring evVel and the time until evVel (t_evVel) in 12 different conditions using a single axis gyroscope attached to the heel cap. Twenty-four recreational runners were instructed to walk and run on a 15-m indoor track at four locomotion speeds (1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 m/s, and individual running speed) and in three footwear conditions (low to high hardness). The gyroscope data and electrogoniometer data were sampled at a rate of 1000 Hz. Comparisons between both measurement devices showed small mean differences up to 49.8 ± 46.9 deg/s for evVel and up to 5.3 ± 3.5 ms for t_evVel. Furthermore, strong relationships between gyroscope and electrogoniometer data were found for evVel as well as for t_evVel for all conditions. It can be concluded that gyroscopes can be used to accurately determine evVel and t_evVel under a variety of conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Human Locomotion, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00028-5 ↗
2. Insertionstendinosen am Schienbein, Achillodynie und Überlastungsfolgen am Fuss.-Ätiologie, Biomechanik, therapeutische Möglichkeiten
3. Some biomechanical aspects of the foot and ankle athletes with and without shin splints10.1177/036354658301100304 ↗
4. The effect of varying midsole hardness on impact forces and foot motion during foot contact in running10.1123/jab.11.4.395 ↗
5. Perceptual and biomechanical variables for running in identical shoe constructions with varying midsole hardness10.1016/S0268-0033(97)00008-9 ↗
6. The role of selected extrinsic foot muscles during running10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.09.001 ↗
7. The position of medial dual density midsole elements in running shoes does not influence biomechanical variables10.1080/19424280.2011.613857 ↗
8. Measuring kinematic changes of the foot using a gyro sensor during intense running10.1080/02640414.2013.843013 ↗
9. Relationship between lower limbs kinematic variables and effectiveness of sprint during maximum velocity phase
10. Brauner, T., Sterzing, T., and Milani, T.L. (2009, January 5–9). Ankle Frontal Plane Kinematics Determined By Goniometer, Gyrometer and Motion Analysis System: a Measurement Device Validation. Proceedings of the 22nd Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics, Cape Town, South Africa.
11. Development of a wearable sensor system for quantitative gait analysis10.1016/j.measurement.2009.02.002 ↗
12. Rearfoot Motion and Pressure Distribution Patterns during Running in Shoes with Varus and Valgus Wedges10.1123/jab.11.2.177 ↗
13. Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: An inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00231-7 ↗
14. RearfootAngle Velocities During Running—A Comparison Between Optoelectronic and Gyroscopic Motion Analysis
15. Systematically modified crash-pad reduces impact shock in running shoes10.1080/19424281003781543 ↗
16. Impact reduction through long-term intervention in recreational runners: Midfoot strike pattern versus low-drop/low-heel height footwear10.1007/s00421-013-2634-7 ↗
17. Effect of strike pattern and orthotic intervention on tibial shock during running10.1123/jab.19.2.153 ↗
18. Long-term cushioning properties of running shoes
19. Comparison of test methods to quantify shock attenuating properties of athletic footwear10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.070 ↗
20. Quantitative Methods in Psychology10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 ↗
21. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278 ↗
22. A comparison of the spatiotemporal parameters, kinematics, and biomechanics between shod, unshod, and minimally supported running as compared to walking10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.09.004 ↗
23. The influence of running velocity and midsole hardness on external impact forces in heel-toe running10.1016/0021-9290(87)90324-1 ↗