Influence of the Quality of Consumer Headphones in the Perception of Spatial Audio
Source abstract
Abstract
High quality headphones can generate a realistic sound immersion reproducing binaural recordings. However, most people commonly use consumer headphones of inferior quality, as the ones provided with smartphones or music players. Factors, such as weak frequency response, distortion and the sensitivity disparity between the left and right transducers could be some of the degrading factors. In this work, we are studying how these factors affect spatial perception. To this purpose, a series or perceptual tests have been carried out with a virtual headphone listening test methodology. The first experiment focuses on the analysis of how the disparity of sensitivity between the two transducers affects the final result. The second test studies the influence of the frequency response relating quality and spatial impression. The third test analyzes the effects of distortion using a Volterra kernels scheme for the simulation of the distortion using convolutions. Finally, the fourth tries to relate the quality of the frequency response with the accuracy on azimuth localization. The conclusions of the experiments are: the disparity between both transducers can affect the localization of the source; the perception of quality and spatial impression has a high correlation; the distortion produced by the range of headphones tested at a fixed level does not affect the perception of binaural sound; and that some frequency bands have an important role in the front-back confusions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Speech and Audio Processing · Noise Effects and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Telecommunications and Multimedia Applications (ITEAM), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia 46022, Spain
Funding
Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Virtual sound source positioning using vector base amplitude panning
2. Acoustic control by wave field synthesis10.1121/1.405852 ↗
3. Blauert, J. (1997). Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6391.001.0001 ↗
4. Begault, D.R. (1994). 3D Sound for Virtual Reality and Multimedia Applications, Academic Press Professional Inc.
5. Bech, S., and Zacharov, N. (2006). Perceptual Audio Evaluation—Theory, Method and Application, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9780470869253 ↗
6. Olive, S.E., and Welti, T. (2012, January 26–29). The relationship between perception and measurement of headphone sound quality. Proceedings of the 133rd AES Convention, San Francisco, CA, USA.
7. Opitz, M. (2006, January 5–8). Headphones listening tests. Proceedings of the 121st AES Convention, San Francisco, CA, USA.
8. Hirvonen, T., Vaalgamaa, M., Backman, J., and Karjalainen, M. (2003, January 22–25). Listening test methodology for headphone evaluation. Proceedings of the 114th AES Convention, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
9. Briolle, F., and Voinier, T. (1992, January 29–31). Transfer function and subjective quality of headphones: Part 2, subjective quality evaluations. Proceedings of the 11th AES International Conference, Portland, OR, USA.
10. Olive, S.E., Welti, T., and McMullin, E. (2013, January 22–24). A virtual headphone listening test methodology. Proceedings of the 51st AES International Conference, Helsinki, Finland.
11. Farina, A. (2000, January 18–22). Simultaneous measurement of impulse response and distortion with a swept-sine technique. Proceedings of the 108th AES Convention, Paris, France.
12. Perceptual evaluation of headphone compensation in binaural synthesis based on non-individual recordings
13. Farina, A., and Armelloni, E. (2005, January 3–5). Emulation of not-linear, time-variant device by the convolution technique. Proceedings of the Congresso AES Italy 2005, Como, Italy.
14. Pulkki, V., and Karjalainen, M. (2015). Communication Acoustics: An Introduction to Speech, Audio and Psychoacoustics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9781119825449 ↗
15. Rumsey, F. (2001). Spatial Audio, Focal Press.
16. Gutierrez-Parera, P., Lopez, J.J., and Aguilera, E. (2015, January 7–10). On the influence of headphones quality in the spatial immersion produced by binaural recordings. Proceedings of the 138th AES Convention, Warsaw, Poland.
17. (2014). Method for the Subjective Assessment of Intermediate Quality Level of Audio Systems, International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
18. Spatial quality evaluation for reproduced sound: Terminology, meaning and a scene-based paradigm
19. (2014). Methods for the Subjective Assessment of Small Impairments in Audio Systems, International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
20. Letowski, T. (1989, January 18–21). Sound quality assessment: Cardinal concepts. Proceedings of the 87th AES Convention, New York, NY, USA.
21. Zacharov, N., and Koivuniemi, K. (2001, January 21–24). Unravelling the perception of spatial sound reproduction. Proceedings of the 19th AES International Conference, Bavaria, Germany.
22. Shinn-Cunningham, B. (2000, January 2–5). Learning reverberation: Considerations for spatial auditory displays. Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD), Atlanta, GA, USA.
23. Localization with binaural recordings from artificial and human heads
24. Directional perception of distributed sound sources10.1121/1.3533727 ↗
25. Mendoça, C., Campos, G., Dias, P., and Santos, J.A. (2013). Learning auditory space: Generalization and long-term effects. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0077900 ↗
26. Toward orthogonal non-individualised head-related transfer functions for forward and backward directional sound: Cluster analysis and an experimental study10.1080/00140131003675117 ↗
27. On the ability of human listeners to distinguish between front and back10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.001 ↗
28. Temme, S., Olive, S.E., Tatarunis, S., Welti, T., and McMullin, E. (2014, January 9–12). The correlation between distortion audibility and listener preference in headphones. Proceedings of the 137th AES Convention, Los Angeles, CA, USA.