journal article·2019-12-11Open access

Design, Application and Effectiveness of an Innovative Augmented Reality Teaching Proposal through 3P Model

Alejandro López-García, Pedro Miralles-Martínez, Javier Maquilón

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 24

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) has evolved hand in hand with advances in technology, and today is considered as an emerging technique in its own right. The aim of our study was to analyze students’ perceptions of how useful AR is in the school environment. A non-experimental quantitative design was used in the form of a questionnaire in which 106 primary sixth-grade students from six schools in the Region of Murcia (Spain) participated. During the study, a teaching proposal using AR related to the content of some curricular areas was put forward in the framework of the 3P learning model. The participants’ perceptions of this technique were analyzed according to each variable, both overall and by gender, via a questionnaire of our own making, which had previously been validated by AR experts, analyzing its psychometric qualities. The initial results indicate that this technique is, according to the students, useful for teaching the curriculum. The conclusion is that AR can increase students’ motivation and enthusiasm while enhancing teaching and learning at the same time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Augmented Reality Applications · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Mobile Learning in Education

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

DICSO Group, Department of Mathematics and Social Sciences Teaching, Faculty of Education, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain

DICSO Group (P.I.), Department of Mathematics and Social Sciences Teaching, Faculty of Education, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain

Institutional Evaluation, Accreditation, Competences and Teaching-Learning in EHEA, Department of Methods of Research and Diagnosis in Education, Faculty of Education, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades · Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad y Fondo Social Europeo · Fundación Séneca

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.014 ↗
2. A review of the types of mobile activities in mobile inquiry-based learning10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.004 ↗
3. Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 ↗
4. Caudell, T.P., and Mizell, D.W. (1992, January 7–10). Augmented Reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA.10.1109/HICSS.1992.183317 ↗
5. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays
6. A survey of Augmented Reality10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 ↗
7. Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers10.1080/10508400701413435 ↗
8. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024 ↗
9. Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications
10. Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for Future Research10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9 ↗
11. Time travel, labour history, and the null curriculum: New design knowledge for mobile augmented reality history games10.1080/13527258.2017.1325768 ↗
12. Koutromanos, G., and Styliaras, G. (2015, January 6–8). The buildings speak about our city: A location based augmented reality game. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), Corfu, Greece.10.1109/IISA.2015.7388031 ↗
13. Augmented Reality Game-Based Learning: Enriching Students’ Experience during Reading Comprehension Activities10.1177/0735633116689789 ↗
14. Chen, Y., Zhou, D., Wang, Y., and Yu, J. (2017, January 27–29). Application of Augmented Reality for Early Childhood English Teaching. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), Hong Kong, China.10.1109/ISET.2017.34 ↗
15. EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.018 ↗
16. Sáez-López, J.-M., Sevillano-García, M.L., and Pascual-Sevillano, M.A. (2019). Application of the ubiquitous game with augmented reality in Primary Education. Comunicar, 61.10.3916/C61-2019-06 ↗
17. Mixed Reality in Science Education as a Learning Support: A Revitalized Science Book10.1177/0735633118757017 ↗
18. Are augmented reality picture books magic or real for preschool children aged five to six?10.1111/bjet.12452 ↗
19. Apply an augmented reality in a mobile guidance to increase sense of place for heritage places
20. Augmented reality and pedestrian navigation through its implementation in m-learning and e-learning: Evaluation of an educational program in Chile10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.003 ↗
21. Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002 ↗
22. Affordances and Limitations of Immersive Participatory Augmented Reality Simulations for Teaching and Learning10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1 ↗
23. Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.008 ↗
24. Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y ↗
25. Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014 ↗
26. Tettegah, S.Y., and Gartmeier, M. (2016). Emotional Design in Digital Media for Learning. Emotions, Technology, Design & Learning, Elsevier.
27. Development and Use of the ARCS Model of Motivational Design10.1007/BF02905780 ↗
28. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 ↗
29. Dunkin, M.J., and Biddle, B.J. (1974). The Study of Teaching, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
30. What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x ↗
31. McMillan, J.H., and Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction, Longman. [5th ed.].
32. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F10.1348/000709901158433 ↗
33. Keller, J.M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3 ↗
34. (2019, November 04). Layar (Version 7) [Computer Software]. Available online: http://www.layar.com/.
35. Marsden, P.V., and Wright, J.D. (2010). Question and Questionnaire Design. Handbook of Survey Research, Emerald Group.
36. Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93 ↗
37. Serrano, F.J. (2008). El cuestionario como instrumento de obtención de datos en la Investigación sobre Educación Matemática. Seminario Sobre Investigación en Didáctica Matemática, Sociedad Educación Matemática.
38. O’Dwyer, L., and Bernauer, J. (2014). Quantitative Research for the Qualitative Researcher, Sage.10.4135/9781506335674 ↗
39. Percepciones sobre el uso de recursos TIC y «mass-media» para la enseñanza de la historia. Un estudio comparativo en futuros docentes de España-Inglaterra
40. Digital resources and didactic methodology in the initial training of History teachers