Show source-provided references
2. Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values
10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.003 ↗3. Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Xia, B., and Li, R.Y.M. (2022). Opportunities and adoption challenges of AI in the construction industry: A PRISMA review. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8.
10.3390/joitmc8010045 ↗4. Brigato, L., and Iocchi, L. (2021, January 10–15). A close look at deep learning with small data. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Milan, Italy.
10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9412492 ↗5. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2021). An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R, Springer. [2nd ed.].
10.1007/978-1-0716-1418-1 ↗8. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer. [2nd ed.].
10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗9. Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0-A human-centric solution. Sustainability, 11.
10.3390/su11164371 ↗12. Na, S., Heo, S., Han, S., Shin, Y., and Roh, Y. (2022). Acceptance model of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in construction firms: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in combination with the Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) framework. Buildings, 12.
10.3390/buildings12020090 ↗13. Musarat, M.A., Hameed, N., Altaf, M., Alaloul, W.S., and Shafiq, N. (2021, January 7–8). Digital transformation of the construction industry: A review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), Sakheer, Bahrain.
10.1109/DASA53625.2021.9682303 ↗14. Digital transformation in the construction industry: A bibliometric review
15. Tjebane, M.M., Musonda, I., and Okoro, C.S. (2022). Organisational factors of artificial intelligence adoption in the South African construction industry. Front. Built Environ., 8.
10.3389/fbuil.2022.823998 ↗16. Na, S., Heo, S., Choi, W., Kim, C., and Whang, S.W. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI)-Based technology adoption in the construction industry: A cross national perspective using the technology acceptance model. Buildings, 13.
10.3390/buildings13102518 ↗17. Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry
10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006 ↗19. Regularization studies of linear discriminant analysis in small sample size scenarios with application to face recognition
10.1016/j.patrec.2004.09.014 ↗21. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
10.2307/249008 ↗24. Bias-variance tradeoff in machine learning: Theoretical formulation and implications to structural engineering applications
10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.004 ↗25. Alves, J., Lima, T.M., and Gaspar, P.D. (2023). Is industry 5.0 a human-centred approach? A systematic review. Processes, 11.
10.3390/pr11010193 ↗26. Martini, B., Bellisario, D., and Coletti, P. (2024). Human-centered and sustainable artificial intelligence in industry 5.0: Challenges and perspectives. Sustainability, 16.
10.3390/su16135448 ↗28. Digital transformation in construction—A review
30. Rane, N. (2023). Integrating building information modelling (BIM) and artificial intelligence (AI) for smart construction schedule, cost, quality, and safety management: Challenges and opportunities. SSRN Electron. J, 4616055.
10.2139/ssrn.4616055 ↗32. Bolpagni, M., Bartoletti, I., and Ciribini, A. (2026, February 10). Artificial Intelligence in the Construction Industry: Adoption, Benefits and Risks. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marzia_Bolpagni/publication/355192584_Artificial_Intelligence_in_the_Construction_Industry_Adoption_Benefits_and_Risks/links/616694e43851f95994f76c33/Artificial-Intelligence-in-the-Construction-Industry-Adoption-Benefits-and-Risks.pdf.
34. Data-driven predictive maintenance planning framework for MEP components based on BIM and IoT using machine learning algorithms
10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103087 ↗35. IoT and fog-computing-based predictive maintenance model for effective asset management in Industry 4.0 using machine learning
10.1109/JIOT.2021.3050441 ↗37. A comprehensive evaluation of factors influencing acceptance of robotic assistants in field construction work
39. A systematic literature review of influencing factors and strategies of artificial intelligence adoption in the construction industry
10.1088/1757-899X/1218/1/012001 ↗40. Lu, Y., and Deng, Y. (2022). What drives construction practitioners’ acceptance of intelligent surveillance systems? An extended technology acceptance model. Buildings, 12.
10.3390/buildings12020104 ↗41. A machine learning approach to assess differential item functioning in psychometric questionnaires using the elastic net regularized ordinal logistic regression in small samples
10.1155/2021/6854477 ↗42. Regularization methods for fitting linear models with small sample sizes: Fitting the Lasso estimator using R
44. The acceptance of personal protective equipment among Hong Kong construction workers: An integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior
10.1016/j.jsr.2021.09.014 ↗47. Comparing within-subject classification and regularization methods in fMRI for large and small sample sizes
10.1002/hbm.22490 ↗48. A survey on nonconvex regularization-based sparse and low-rank recovery in signal processing, statistics, and machine learning
10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2880454 ↗51. Leave-one-out cross-validation, penalization, and differential bias of some prediction model performance measures-a simulation study
10.1186/s41512-023-00146-0 ↗54. Varma, S., and Simon, R. (2006). Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC Bioinform., 7.
10.1186/1471-2105-7-91 ↗55. Cawley, G.C. (2006, January 16–21). Leave-one-out cross-validation based model selection criteria for weighted LS-SVMs. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
10.1109/IJCNN.2006.246634 ↗56. Breque, M., De Nul, L., and Petridis, A. (2026, February 10). Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/eug/wpaper/ki-bd-20-021-en-n.html.
57. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., and Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0: Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, Acatech (National Academy of Science and Engineering).
10.3390/sci4030026 ↗58. Digitalization and automation in construction project’s life-cycle: A review
59. Prebanić, K.R., and Vukomanović, M. (2021). Realizing the need for digital transformation of stakeholder management: A systematic review in the construction industry. Sustainability, 13.
10.3390/su132212690 ↗60. Pal, U.K., Zhang, C., Haupt, T.C., Li, H., and Su, L. (2024). The evolution of Construction 5.0: Challenges and opportunities. Buildings, 14.
10.3390/buildings14124010 ↗61. Yitmen, I. (Smart Sustain. Built Environ., 2024). Facilitating Construction 5.0 for smart, sustainable and human-centric construction, Smart Sustain. Built Environ., in press.
62. Marović, I., Perić, M., and Hanák, T. (2021). A multi-criteria decision support concept for selecting the optimal contractor. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app11041660 ↗63. The application of multi-criteria analysis in the evaluation of partnering relations and the selection of a construction company to cooperate with
65. Fidelis, E., Sherratt, F., and Soeiro, A. (2023). Increasing construction safety through virtual reality. Proceedings of the Digital Transformation of Health and Safety in Construction (CIBW099W123), Porto, Portugal, 21–22 June 2023, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction.
66. Catalá Pérez, D., Perelló-Marín, M.R., and Carrascosa López, C. (2023). Business Meets Technology: 5th International Conference (BMT 2023), Valencia, Spain, 13–15 July 2023, Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
67. Knapčíková, L. (2020). New Approaches in Management of Smart Manufacturing Systems: Knowledge and Practice, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-030-40176-4 ↗68. Egwim, C.N., Alaka, H., Demir, E., Balogun, H., Olu-Ajayi, R., Sulaimon, I., Wusu, G., Yusuf, W., and Muideen, A.A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Review of the Entire Construction Value Chain Lifecycle. Energies, 17.
10.3390/en17010182 ↗70. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., and Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0 (Final Report), National Academy of Science and Engineering.
73. Yigitcanlar, T., and Cugurullo, F. (2020). The sustainability of artificial intelligence: An urbanistic viewpoint from the lens of smart and sustainable cities. Sustainability, 12.
10.3390/su12208548 ↗75. Virtual Reality Training for Occupational Risk Prevention: Application Case in Geotechnical Drilling Works
76. SIMURG_CITIES Conceptual Model: Multi-Dimensional and Multi-Layer Performance-Based Assessment of Urban Sustainability at the City Level
77. Digital Virtual Anchors Impact in Entertainment Industry: An Exploration of User Acceptance and Market Insights
10.57017/jorit.v4.2(8).01 ↗