journal article·2026-01-22Open access

Grey Wolf Optimization-Optimized Ensemble Models for Predicting the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rocks

Xigui Zheng, Arzoo Batool, Santosh Kumar, Niaz Muhammad Shahani

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

Reliable models for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rocks are crucial for mining operations and rock engineering design. Empirical methods, including statistical methods, are often faced with many limitations when generalizing in a wide range of lithological types. To address this limitation, this study investigates the capability of grey wolf optimization (GWO)-optimized ensemble machine learning models, including decision tree (DT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) for predicting UCS using a small dataset of easily measurable and non-destructive rock index properties. The study’s objective is to evaluate whether metaheuristic-based hyperparameter optimization can enhance model robustness and generalization performance under small-sample conditions. A unified experimental framework incorporating GWO-based optimization, three-fold cross-validation, sensitivity analysis, and multiple statistical performance indicators was implemented. The findings of this study confirm that although the GWO-XGBoost model achieves the highest training accuracy, it exhibits signs of mild overfitting. In contrast, the GWO-AdaBoost model outpaced with significant improvement in terms of coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.993, root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.2830, mean absolute error (MAE) = 1.6853, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 4.6974. Therefore, the GWO-AdaBoost has proven to be the most effective in terms of its prediction potential of UCS, with significant potential for adaptation due to its effectively learned parameters. From a theoretical perspective, this study highlights the non-equivalence between training accuracy and predictive reliability in UCS modeling. Practically, the findings support the use of GWO-AdaBoost as a reliable decision-support tool for preliminary rock strength assessment in mining and geotechnical engineering, particularly when comprehensive laboratory testing is not feasible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Mineral Processing and Grinding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

Faculty of Science, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan

Funding

the Guizhou Provincial Education Department's (Hundred Schools Thousands of Enterprises Science and Technology Research List) Project · the Qiankehezhongyindi

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. (2014). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength and Elastic Moduli of Intact Rock Core Specimens. (Standard No. ASTM D7012-14).
2. Ulusay, R., and Hudson, J.A. (2007). The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974–2006, Turkish National Group. International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM).
3. Hoek, E., and Brown, E.T. (2019). Underground Excavations in Rock, CRC Press.
4. Evaluation of simple methods for assessing UCS of rock10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00039-9 ↗
5. Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock Using Machine Learning
6. Rock strength prediction based on machine learning: A study from prediction model to mechanism explanation10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115373 ↗
7. Qiu, J., Yin, X., Pan, Y., Wang, X., and Zhang, M. (2022). Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength in Rocks Based on Extreme Learning Machine Improved with Metaheuristic Algorithm. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10193490 ↗
8. Research on prediction method of rock uniaxial compressive strength based on interpretable INFO-Stacking model10.1016/j.enganabound.2025.106390 ↗
9. Gao, S., Gu, Z., Xiong, X., and Wang, C. (2025). Influence Mechanism of Rock Compressive Mechanical Properties Under Freeze-Thaw Cycles: Insights from Machine Learning. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 9.10.3390/bdcc9120323 ↗
10. An ensemble tree-based machine learning model for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength of travertine rocks10.1007/s00521-019-04418-z ↗
11. Prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks from simple index tests using a random forest predictive model10.5802/crmeca.3 ↗
12. Xu, B., Tan, Y., Sun, W., Ma, T., Liu, H., and Wang, D. (2023). Study on the prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength of rock based on the SSA-XGBoost model. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15065201 ↗
13. Li, C., Zhou, J., Dias, D., and Gui, Y. (2022). A Kernel Extreme Learning Machine-Grey Wolf Optimizer (KELM-GWO) Model to Predict Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178468 ↗
14. Wei, X., Shahani, N.M., and Zheng, X. (2023). Predictive modeling of the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using an artificial neural network approach. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11071650 ↗
15. Uniaxial compressive strength prediction for rock material in deep mine using boosting-based machine learning methods and optimization algorithms
16. Wang, Y., Hasanipanah, M., Rashid, A.S.A., Le, B.N., and Ulrikh, D.V. (2023). Advanced Tree-Based Techniques for Predicting Unconfined Compressive Strength of Rock Material Employing Non-Destructive and Petrographic Tests. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16103731 ↗
17. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of rock based on lithology using stacking models10.1016/j.rockmb.2023.100081 ↗
18. A systematic literature review on artificial intelligence techniques for rock UCS and elastic modulus estimation10.1007/s00521-025-11517-7 ↗
19. Xie, H., Lin, P., Kang, J., Zhai, C., and Du, Y. (2024). Prediction Method of Rock Uniaxial Compressive Strength Based on Feature Optimization and SSA-XGBoost. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16198460 ↗
20. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) prediction in real-time while drilling using artificial intelligence tools10.1007/s00521-020-05546-7 ↗
21. Deep learning for intelligent prediction of rock strength by adopting measurement while drilling data10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8080 ↗
22. Application of Gradient Boosting Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Soft Sedimentary Rocks at Thar Coalfield10.1155/2021/2565488 ↗
23. Advanced hybrid models for predicting dynamic compressive strength of rocks: Exploring various input scenarios and introducing novel empirical approaches10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107947 ↗
24. Predicting the uniaxial compressive strength of different rock types using implementable stochastically modified artificial neural network and Shapley additive explanations10.1007/s41939-025-01050-4 ↗
25. Predicting uniaxial compressive strength from drilling variables aided by hybrid machine learning10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105546 ↗
26. Fereidooni, D., Karimi, Z., and Ghasemi, F. (2024). Non-destructive test-based assessment of uniaxial compressive strength and elasticity modulus of intact carbonate rocks using stacking ensemble models. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0302944 ↗
27. Prediction of Rock Abrasivity Index (RAI) and Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) of Granite Building Stones Using Nondestructive Tests
28. Intelligent modelling of clay compressibility using hybrid meta-heuristic and machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.gsf.2020.02.014 ↗
29. Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock Via Genetic Algorithm—Selective Ensemble Learning10.1007/s11053-022-10065-4 ↗
30. Performance prediction and Bayesian optimization of screw compressors using Gaussian Process Regression10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108270 ↗
31. Bayesian optimization-enhanced ensemble learning for the uniaxial compressive strength prediction of natural rock and its application10.1016/j.ghm.2024.05.002 ↗
32. Prediction of compressive strength of granite: Use of machine learning techniques and intelligent system10.1007/s12145-023-01145-x ↗
34. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., and Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth International Group.
35. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
36. Utilizing machine learning and digital twin technology for rock parameter estimation from drilling data
37. Estimation of strength parameters of rock using artificial neural networks10.1007/s10064-010-0301-3 ↗
38. Software defect prediction: Effect of feature selection and ensemble methods
39. SLDeep: Statement-level software defect prediction using deep-learning model on static code features10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113156 ↗
40. A hierarchical analysis for rock engineering using the cosine amplitude method
41. Wang, G., Chen, X., and Chen, W. (2020). Spatial Prediction of Landslide Susceptibility Based on GIS and Discriminant Functions. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9030144 ↗
42. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007 ↗
43. Asteris, P.G., Plevris, V., Sarhosis, V., Papaloizou, L., Mohebkhah, A., Komodromos, P., and Lemos, J.V. (2015). Numerical Modeling of Historic Masonry Structures, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-8286-3.ch007 ↗