Accuracy of PET Imaging and Ultrasonography for Preoperative Staging of Cervical Lymph Node Status in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Cervical lymph node status is the strongest prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). While 18F-FDG-PET and cervical ultrasonography are widely used for preoperative staging, their diagnostic accuracy remains limited for small or equivocal nodes. This study compared both modalities against histopathology on a per-level basis and examined correlations of SUVmax and RECIST values with metastatic involvement. Methods: This retrospective single-centre study included patients with histologically confirmed OSCC who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG-PET and cervical ultrasonography, followed by resection and neck dissection (October 2018–December 2024). Imaging was interpreted independently and blinded to clinical and histopathological data. Histopathology served as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed on a level-by-level basis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated and compared using McNemar’s test and logistic regression. Results: Among 100 patients (mean age 63.5 ± 10.6 years; 54% male, 46% female), the lateral tongue was the most frequent site (44%), and 31% showed nodal involvement on PET imaging. PET imaging yielded 59% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and 77% accuracy; ultrasonography achieved higher sensitivity (76%) but lower specificity (67%). Combined assessment improved sensitivity (78%) and NPV (82%) but reduced specificity. PET imaging was more specific, while ultrasonography was more sensitive. SUVmax and RECIST values were higher in metastatic nodes and independently predicted metastasis, though with substantial overlap and no reliable cut-off. Conclusions: PET imaging offers higher specificity, whereas ultrasonography provides greater sensitivity. Their complementary performance supports a multimodal approach to cervical staging in OSCC. Neither SUVmax nor RECIST values reliably distinguished benign from malignant lymph nodes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Head and Neck Cancer Studies · Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment · Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Military Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
2. Demographics of Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Single Institution Experience
3. Head and Neck Cancer. Longo DL, editor10.1056/NEJMra1715715 ↗
4. Malignant tumors of the oral cavity10.1007/s00117-020-00756-5 ↗
5. Epidemiology and pathology of oral squamous cell carcinoma in a multi-ethnic population: Retrospective study of 154 cases over 7 years in Qatar10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.029 ↗
6. Accurate preoperative staging with [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: A comparison to 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT10.1007/s00330-022-08686-7 ↗
7. Comparison of CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET/CT for initial N-staging of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis10.1007/s00259-022-05843-4 ↗
8. Abati, S., Bramati, C., Bondi, S., Lissoni, A., and Trimarchi, M. (2020). Oral Cancer and Precancer: A Narrative Review on the Relevance of Early Diagnosis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 8.10.3390/ijerph17249160 ↗
9. CT, MR, US, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck10.1007/s00330-008-1192-6 ↗
10. Evaluation of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of Clinical, FNAC, Ultra Sonography and Computed Tomography with Post Operative Histopathology10.1007/s12070-021-02495-y ↗
11. Takamura, M., Nikkuni, Y., Hayashi, T., Katsura, K., Nishiyama, H., Yamazaki, M., Maruyama, S., and Tanuma, J.-I. (2023). Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography, CT, MRI, and PET/CT in Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Biomedicines, 11.10.3390/biomedicines11123119 ↗
12. Evaluation of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography with histopathologic correlation in the initial staging of head and neck cancer10.1097/00000658-200208000-00009 ↗
13. Comparison of Sonography and CT for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck10.2214/ajr.176.4.1761019 ↗
14. Imaging in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guide-lines10.1017/S0022215116000396 ↗
15. Assessment of cervical lymph node metastases using FDG-PET in patients with head and neck cancer10.1007/s12149-007-0097-9 ↗
16. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Oral Cavity Cancer
17. The Role of FDG-PET/CT Imaging in Head and Neck Malignant Conditions: Impact on Diagnostic Accuracy and Patient Care10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.001 ↗
18. Impact of FDG-PET/CT Imaging on Nodal Staging for Head-And-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.032 ↗
19. Comparison of PET/CT and MRI for the detection of bone marrow invasion in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.02.010 ↗
20. False-positive positron emission tomography appearance with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose after definitive radiotherapy for cancer of the mobile tongue10.1259/bjr/96087474 ↗
21. Clinical utility and prospective comparison of ultrasonography and computed tomography imaging in staging of neck metastases in head and neck squamous cell cancer in an Indian setup10.1007/s10147-011-0250-2 ↗
22. Effectiveness of diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck malignancies10.1016/j.oooo.2020.06.025 ↗
23. STROBEInitiative Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation elaboration10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014 ↗
24. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 ↗
25. A rational classification of neck dissections. Otolaryngol
26. Neck dissection classification update: Revisions proposed by the American Head and Neck Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery10.1001/archotol.128.7.751 ↗
27. Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: A 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.010 ↗
28. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more ‘personalized’ approach to cancer staging
29. A note on the tests for clustered matched-pair binary data10.1002/bimj.201000035 ↗
30. PET-CT scan-based maximum standardized uptake value as a prognostic predictor in oropharynx squamous cell cancer
31. Prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas10.2147/OTT.S85479 ↗
32. Correlatıon between PET-CT uptake values and pathologıcaly features ın head and neck cancer10.1007/s00405-025-09228-9 ↗
33. FDG PET/CT for Management and Assessing Outcomes of Squamous Cell Cancer of the Oral Cavity10.2214/AJR.14.13830 ↗
34. Comparison of Clinical and Pathological Staging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer After Neck Dissection10.1055/s-0042-1758208 ↗
35. Nodal imaging in the neck: Recent advances in US, CT and MR imaging of metastatic nodes10.1007/s00330-006-0490-0 ↗
36. Eida, S., Fukuda, M., Katayama, I., Takagi, Y., Sasaki, M., Mori, H., Kawakami, M., Nishino, T., Ariji, Y., and Sumi, M. (2024). Metastatic Lymph Node Detection on Ultrasound Images Using YOLOv7 in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers, 8.10.3390/cancers16020274 ↗
37. 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged N0 by clinical examination and CT/MRI
38. Normal uptake of 18F-FDG in the testis: An assessment by PET/CT10.1007/s12149-007-0041-z ↗
39. An evaluation of FDG-PET in the detection and differentiation of thyroid tumours10.1097/00006231-199710000-00011 ↗
40. Impact of a second FDG PET scan before adjuvant therapy for the early detection of residual/relapsing tumours in high-risk patients with oral cavity cancer and pathological extracapsular spread10.1007/s00259-012-2103-2 ↗