Application of Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks in Classifying Plant Responses to Abiotic Stress
Source abstract
Abstract
Agriculture is a major economic industry that sustains life. Moreover, plant health is a crucial aspect of a highly functional agricultural system. Because stress agents can damage crops and plants, it is important to understand what effect these agents can have and be able to detect this negative impact early in the process. Machine learning technology can help to prevent these undesirable consequences. This research investigates machine learning applications for plant health analysis and classification. Specifically, Residual Networks (ResNet) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models are utilized to detect and classify plants response to abiotic external stressors. Two types of plants, azalea (shrub) and Chinese tallow (tree), were used in this research study and different concentrations of sodium chloride (NaCL) and acetic acid were used to treat the plants. Data from cameras and soil sensors were analyzed by the machine learning algorithms. The ResNet34 and LSTM models achieved accuracies of 96% and 97.8%, respectively, in classifying plants with good, medium, or bad health status on test data sets. These results demonstrate that machine learning algorithms can be used to accurately detect plant health status as well as healthy and unhealthy plant conditions and thus potentially prevent negative long-term effects in agriculture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement · Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, LA 70807, USA
Department of Urban Forestry, Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, LA 70807, USA
Department of Chemistry, Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, LA 70807, USA
Funding
United States Government
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Hemathilake, D.M.K.S., and Gunathilake, D.M.C.C. (2022). Agricultural productivity and food supply to meet increased demands. Future Foods, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-323-91001-9.00016-5 ↗
2. The importance of plants to development and maintenance of soil structure, microbial communities and ecosystem functions10.1016/j.still.2017.09.002 ↗
3. Velmourougane, K., and Blaise, D. (2017). Soil health, crop productivity and sustainability challenges. Sustainability Challenges in the Agrofood Sector, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119072737.ch21 ↗
4. Minhas, P.S., Rane, J., and Pasala, R.K. (2017). Abiotic stresses in agriculture: An overview. Abiotic Stress Management for Resilient Agriculture, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-5744-1 ↗
5. Nicolopoulou-Stamati, P., Maipas, S., Kotampasi, C., Stamatis, P., and Hens, L. (2016). Chemical pesticides and human health: The urgent need for a new concept in agriculture. Front. Public Health, 4.10.3389/fpubh.2016.00148 ↗
6. Kudo, T., To, T.K., and Kim, J.-M. (2023). Simple and universal function of acetic acid to overcome the drought crisis. Stress Biol., 3.10.1007/s44154-023-00094-1 ↗
7. Mahmud, S., Kamruzzaman, M., Bhattacharyya, S., Alharbi, K., Abd El Moneim, D., and Mostofa, M.G. (2023). Acetic acid positively modulates proline metabolism for mitigating PEG-mediated drought stress in maize and Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci., 14.10.3389/fpls.2023.1167238 ↗
8. Machado, R.M.A., and Serralheiro, R.P. (2017). Soil salinity: Effect on vegetable crop growth. Management practices to prevent and mitigate soil salinization. Horticulturae, 3.10.3390/horticulturae3020030 ↗
9. Rahman, M.M., Keya, S.S., Sahu, A., Gupta, A., Dhingra, A., Tran, L.S.P., and Mostofa, M.G. (2024). Acetic acid: A cheap but chief metabolic regulator for abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Stress Biol., 4.10.1007/s44154-024-00167-9 ↗
10. Soluble salts in compost and their effects on soil and plants: A review10.1080/1065657X.2020.1772906 ↗
11. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 ↗
12. A systematic analysis of machine learning and deep learning based approaches for identifying and diagnosing plant diseases
13. Garofalo, S.P., Ardito, F., Sanitate, N., De Carolis, G., Ruggieri, S., Giannico, V., Rana, G., and Ferrara, R.M. (2025). Robustness of Actual Evapotranspiration Predicted by Random Forest Model Integrating Remote Sensing and Meteorological Information: Case of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus, (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai, 1916). Water, 17.10.3390/w17030323 ↗
14. Sujatha, R., Krishnan, S., Chatterjee, J.M., and Gandomi, A.H. (2025). Advancing plant leaf disease detection integrating machine learning and deep learning. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-024-72197-2 ↗
15. Machine learning in plant science and plant breeding10.1016/j.isci.2020.101890 ↗
16. Rico-Chávez, A.K., Franco, J.A., Fernandez-Jaramillo, A.A., Contreras-Medina, L.M., Guevara-González, R.G., and Hernandez-Escobedo, Q. (2022). Machine Learning for Plant Stress Modeling: A Perspective towards Hormesis Management. Plants, 11.10.3390/plants11070970 ↗
17. Tran, D., Dutoit, F., Najdenovska, E., Wallbridge, N., Plummer, C., Mazza, M., Raileanu, L.E., and Camps, C. (2019). Electrophysiological assessment of plant status outside a Faraday cage using supervised machine learning. Sci. Rep., 9.10.1038/s41598-019-53675-4 ↗
18. Time-serial analysis of deep neural network models for prediction of climatic conditions inside a greenhouse10.1016/j.compag.2020.105402 ↗
19. Improved Soil Quality Prediction Model Using Deep Learning for Smart Agriculture Systems10.32604/csse.2023.027580 ↗
20. Machine learning enabled IoT system for soil nutrients monitoring and crop recommendation
21. Grunwald, S., Murad, M.O.F., Farrington, S., Wallace, W., and Rooney, D. (2024). Multi-Sensor Soil Probe and Machine Learning Modeling for Predicting Soil Properties. Sensors, 24.10.20944/preprints202409.1448.v1 ↗
22. Image-based plant diseases detection using deep learning10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.281 ↗
23. Image-based crop disease detection using machine learning10.1111/ppa.14006 ↗
24. Thiagarajan, J.D., Kulkarni, S.V., Jadhav, S.A., Waghe, A.A., Raja, S.P., Rajagopal, S., Poddar, H., and Subramaniam, S. (2024). Analysis of banana plant health using machine learning techniques. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-63930-y ↗
25. Elsherbiny, O., Elaraby, A., Alahmadi, M., Hamdan, M., and Gao, J. (2024). Rapid grapevine health diagnosis based on digital imaging and deep learning. Plants, 13.10.3390/plants13010135 ↗
26. A novel framework for image-based plant disease detection using hybrid deep learning approach10.1007/s00500-022-07177-7 ↗
27. Albahli, S. (2025). AgriFusionNet: A Lightweight Deep Learning Model for Multisource Plant Disease Diagnosis. Agriculture, 15.10.3390/agriculture15141523 ↗
28. Exploring the frontiers of plant health: Harnessing NIR fluorescence and surface-enhanced Raman scattering modalities for innovative detection10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110336 ↗
29. Hossain, N.I., and Tabassum, S. (2023). A hybrid multifunctional physicochemical sensor suite for continuous monitoring of crop health. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-37041-z ↗
30. Analysis of formal concepts for verification of pests and diseases of crops using machine learning methods10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3361046 ↗
31. Machine Learning Overview in Agriculture
32. Benos, L., Tagarakis, A.C., Dolias, G., Berruto, R., Kateris, D., and Bochtis, D. (2021). Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Updated Review. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21113758 ↗
33. Liu, J., and Wang, X. (2024). A multimodal framework for pepper diseases and pests detection. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-80675-w ↗
34. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
35. Wu, W., Huo, L., Yang, G., Liu, X., and Li, H. (2025). Research into the application of ResNet in soil: A review. Agriculture, 15.10.3390/agriculture15060661 ↗
36. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
37. Machine learning for low signal-to-noise ratio detection10.1016/j.patrec.2024.02.008 ↗
38. Yang, C., Gan, X., Peng, A., and Yuan, X. (2023). ResNet based on multi-feature attention mechanism for sound classification in noisy environments. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151410762 ↗
39. Machine learning techniques for the assessment of citrus plant health using UAV-based digital images
40. Tomato leaf color as predictor of soil moisture value using machine learning techniques
41. Wang, Q., Lu, X., Zhang, H., Yang, B., Gong, R., Zhang, J., Jin, Z., Xie, R., Xia, J., and Zhao, J. (2023). Comparison of machine learning methods for estimating leaf area index and aboveground biomass of cinnamomum camphora based on UAV multispectral remote sensing data. Forests, 14.10.2139/ssrn.4463416 ↗
42. Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll content using airborne multispectral imagery and machine learning10.1016/j.atech.2024.100719 ↗
43. A multi-modal approach for crop health mapping using low altitude remote sensing, internet of things (IoT) and machine learning10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002948 ↗
44. Gorriz, J.M., Segovia, F., Ramirez, J., Ortiz, A., and Suckling, J. (2024). Is K-fold cross validation the best model selection method for Machine Learning?. arXiv.
45. White, J., and Power, S.D. (2023). k-fold cross-validation can significantly over-estimate true classification accuracy in common EEG-based passive BCI experimental designs: An empirical investigation. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23136077 ↗
46. Performance of machine learning algorithms with different K values in K-fold cross-validation
47. K-fold cross-validation for complex sample surveys10.1002/sta4.454 ↗
48. Multi-spectral imaging for fruits and vegetables
49. Design and verification of a low-cost multispectral camera for precision agriculture application10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3377104 ↗
50. Effects of environmental conditions on vegetation indices from multispectral images: A review
51. Waiphara, P., Bourgenot, C., Compton, L.J., and Prashar, A. (2022). Optical imaging resources for crop phenotyping and stress detection. Environmental Responses in Plants: Methods and Protocols, Springer.10.1007/978-1-0716-2297-1_18 ↗
52. Zandi, A., Hosseinirad, S., Zadeh, H.K., Tavakolian, K., Cho, B.-K., Vasefi, F., Kim, M.S., and Tavakolian, P. (2025). A systematic review of multi-mode analytics for enhanced plant stress evaluation. Front. Plant Sci., 16.10.3389/fpls.2025.1545025 ↗
53. El Sakka, M., Ivanovici, M., Chaari, L., and Mothe, J. (2025). A review of CNN applications in smart agriculture using multimodal data. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25020472 ↗
54. Garg, S., Pundir, P., Jindal, H., Saini, H., and Garg, S. (2021, January 6–8). Towards a multimodal system for precision agriculture using IoT and machine learning. Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Kharagpur, India.10.1109/ICCCNT51525.2021.9579646 ↗
55. Detecting crop health using machine learning techniques in smart agriculture system
56. Sensor fusion techniques in deep learning for multimodal fruit and vegetable quality assessment: A comprehensive review10.1007/s11694-024-02789-z ↗
57. Prajwal, T.S., and Ilavarasi, A.K. (2023, January 3–5). A comparative study of RESNET-pretrained models for computer vision. Proceedings of the 2023 Fifteenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing, Noida, India.10.1145/3607947.3608042 ↗
58. Siami-Namini, S., Tavakoli, N., and Namin, A.S. (2018, January 17–20). A comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in forecasting time series. Proceedings of the 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00227 ↗
59. Paliari, I., Karanikola, A., and Kotsiantis, S. (2021, January 12–14). A comparison of the optimized LSTM, XGBOOST and ARIMA in Time Series forecasting. Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), Chania Crete, Greece.10.1109/IISA52424.2021.9555520 ↗
60. Saifullah, S. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Long Short-Term Memory and Gated Recurrent Unit Models for Chicken Egg Fertility Classification Using Deep Learning. Eng. Proc., 87.10.3390/engproc2025087007 ↗