journal article·2025-10-12Open access

Analysis of Changes in the Microbial Biodiversity of Soil Contaminated with Cr(III) and Cr(VI)

Edyta Boros-Lajszner, Jadwiga Wyszkowska, Małgorzata Baćmaga, Jan Kucharski

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

Contamination with heavy metals, including chromium that exists in two oxidation states—Cr(III) and Cr(VI)—poses a significant challenge for the soil environment. Both chemical forms of chromium can exert toxic effects on microorganisms that play a key role in maintaining soil fertility and plant health. The aim of the study was to compare the selective toxic effects of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) ions on soil bacterial and fungal taxonomic diversity using NGS technology. The data obtained enabled a comprehensive characterisation of the taxonomic profile of the soil microbiome exposed to both forms of chromium, providing a basis for further research into the adaptation and resistance mechanisms of microorganisms. The calculated diversity indices, in particular the Shannon-Wiener index, suggest that Cr(VI) is more toxic to bacteria than Cr(III). In soil contaminated with chromium, the relative abundance of chromium-resistant bacteria of the phylum Actinobacteriota increased to the detriment of chromium-sensitive Acidobacteriota and Proteobacteriota. The abundance of Ascomycota, the dominant fungal phylum, increased in soil with Cr(III) and decreased in soil with Cr(VI). Cr(III) promoted the growth of bacteria of the genera Phycicoccus and Arthrobacter and Penicillium fungi. In turn, Cr(VI) stimulated the growth of bacteria of the genera Mycoplana and Cellulosimicrobium, and Trichoderma fungi. The study demonstrated that microbial resistance mechanisms are influenced by the chemical form of chromium. In addition, the increased abundance of chromium-resistant taxa highlights their potential for the bioremediation of soils contaminated with this element.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chromium effects and bioremediation · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Heavy metals in environment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Soil Science and Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland

Funding

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Department of Soil Science and Microbiology · inister of Science under the Regional Initiative of Excellence Program

References (86)

Show source-provided references
1. Chromium in plant growth and development: Toxicity, tolerance and hormesis10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120084 ↗
2. Tumolo, M., Ancona, V., De Paola, D., Losacco, D., Campanale, C., Massarelli, C., and Uricchio, V.F. (2020). Chromium pollution in european water, sources, health risk, and remediation strategies: An Overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17155438 ↗
3. Remediation of soil contaminated with high levels of hexavalent chromium by combined chemical-microbial reduction and stabilization10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123847 ↗
4. Zulfiqar, U., Jiang, W., Wang, X., Hussain, S., Ahmad, M., and Maqsood, M.F. (2022). Insights into the plant-microbe interaction, soil amendments and advanced genetic approaches for cadmium remediation: A review. insights into the plant-microbe interaction, soil amendments and advanced genetic approaches for cadmium remediation: A review. Front. Plant Sci., 13.10.3389/fpls.2022.773815 ↗
5. Wyszkowska, J., Borowik, A., Zaborowska, M., and Kucharski, J. (2023). Calorific value of Zea mays biomass derived from soil contaminated with chromium (VI). Energies, 16.10.3390/en16093788 ↗
6. Formation and immobilization of Cr(VI) species in long-term tannery waste contaminated soils10.1021/acs.est.0c00156 ↗
7. Heavy Metal Contamination in Soils, Water, and Food in Nigeria from 2000–2019: A Systematic Review on Methods, Pollution Level and Policy Implications10.1007/s11270-024-07408-7 ↗
8. (2025, September 10). Available online: https://www.statista.com.
9. (2025, September 10). Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/lrtap-1990-2022.
10. The biological properties of the soil as influenced by chromium contamination
11. Assessment of chromium toxicity and potential health implications of agriculturally diversely irrigated food crops in the semi-arid regions of South Asia10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107833 ↗
12. Zhang, S., Hao, X., Tang, J., Hu, J., Deng, Y., Xu, M., Zhu, P., Tao, J., Liang, Y., and Yin, H. (2020). Assessing chromium contamination in red soil: Monitoring the migration of fractions and the change of related microorganisms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17082835 ↗
13. Sorption kinetics of an eco-friendly and sustainable Cr(VI) ion scavenger in a batch reactor10.1016/j.jece.2021.105125 ↗
14. Li, W., Wang, T., Chen, W., Wen, Y., Zhang, W., Guo, B., and Yang, Y. (2023). Responses of bacterial communities along vertical soil profile to the chromium-contamination stress. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 179.10.1016/j.ibiod.2023.105584 ↗
15. Soil contamination with chromium and its enzymatic activity and yielding
16. Boros-Lajszner, E., Wyszkowska, J., and Kucharski, J. (2023). Evaluation and assessment of trivalent and hexavalent chromium on Avena sativa and soil enzymes. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28124693 ↗
17. Chromium contamination affects the fungal community and increases the complexity and stability of the network in long-term contaminated soils10.1016/j.envres.2024.119946 ↗
18. Response of soil fungal community to chromium contamination in agricultural soils with different physicochemical properties10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163244 ↗
19. Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes10.1038/s41559-019-1084-y ↗
20. Liu, Y.-R., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Bi, L., Zhu, J., and He, J.-Z. (2018). Consistent responses of soil microbial taxonomic and functional attributes to mercury pollution across China. Microbiome, 6.10.1186/s40168-018-0572-7 ↗
21. Proteomic analysis of the reduction and resistance mechanisms of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 under long-term hexavalent chromium stress10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.016 ↗
22. Bioremediation of toxic heavy metals (THMs) contaminated sites: Concepts, applications and challenges10.1007/s11356-020-08903-0 ↗
23. Nickel drives bacterial community diversity in the rhizosphere of the hyperaccumulator Alyssum murale10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.07.010 ↗
24. Genomic insights into the Acidobacteria reveal strategies for their success in terrestrial environments10.1111/1462-2920.14043 ↗
25. Mechanisms of Cr(VI) reduction by Bacillus sp. CRB-1, a novel Cr(VI)-reducing bacterium isolated from tannery activated sludge10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109792 ↗
26. Bioaccumulation of chromium by Fusarium oxysporum10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2016.42.092 ↗
27. Bioremediation of hexavalent chromium by endophytic fungi; safe and improved production of Lactuca sativa L10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.197 ↗
28. Canonica, L., Cecchi, G., Capra, V., Di Piazza, S., Girelli, A., Zappatore, S., and Zotti, M. (2024). Fungal arsenic tolerance and bioaccumulation: Local strains from polluted water vs. allochthonous strains. Environments, 11.10.3390/environments11010023 ↗
29. Molecular mechanisms of Cr (VI) resistance in bacteria and fungi10.1111/1574-6976.12051 ↗
30. A comprehensive review on chromium (Cr) contamination and Cr(VI)-resistant extremophiles in diverse extreme environments10.1007/s11356-023-26624-y ↗
31. Detoxification of hexavalent chromate by growing Paecilomyces lilacinus XLA10.1016/j.envpol.2017.03.039 ↗
32. Removal of hexavalent chromium by Aspergillus niger through reduction and accumulation10.1080/01490451.2020.1807659 ↗
33. Dubey, P., Farooqui, A., Patel, A., and Srivastava, P.K. (2024). Microbial innovations in chromium remediation: Mechanistic insights and diverse applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 40.10.1007/s11274-024-03936-w ↗
34. Biotreatment potential of co-contaminants hexavalent chromium and polychlorinated biphenyls in industrial wastewater: Individual and simultaneous prospects10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146345 ↗
35. Design, synthesis, DFT calculations, molecular docking and antimicrobial activities of novel cobalt, chromium metal complexes of heterocyclic moiety-based 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives10.1080/07391102.2021.1965031 ↗
36. Zulfiqar, U., Haider, F.U., Ahmad, M., Hussain, S., Maqsood, M.F., Ishfaq, M., Shahzad, B., Waqas, M.M., Ali, B., and Tayyab, M.N. (2023). Chromium toxicity, speciation, and remediation strategies in soil-plant interface: A critical review. Front. Plant Sci., 13.10.3389/fpls.2022.1081624 ↗
37. Health hazards of hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) and its microbial reduction10.1080/21655979.2022.2037273 ↗
38. Potential of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to mitigate chromium contamination10.1016/j.eti.2022.102826 ↗
39. (2025, September 01). Available online: https://zpe.gov.pl/a/soils-in-poland.
40. Wyszkowska, J., Boros-Lajszner, E., and Kucharski, J. (2024). The impact of soil contamination with lead on the biomass of maize intended for energy purposes, and the biochemical and physicochemical properties of the soil. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17051156 ↗
41. Refocusing on nonpriority toxic metals in the aquatic environment in China10.1021/acs.est.7b00223 ↗
42. Environmental chemistry and ecotoxicology of hazardous heavy metals: Environmental persistence, toxicity, and tioaccumulation10.1155/2019/6730305 ↗
43. (2018, November 21). World’s Worst Pollution Problems 2015. The New Top Six Toxic Threats: A Priority List for Remediation. Available online: http://www.worstpolluted.org/docs/WWPP_2015_Final.pdf.
44. (2025, September 11). Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 1 September 2016 Applicable in Poland (Journal of Laws 2016 item 1395). ISAP—Internet System of Legal Acts, Available online: http://https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20160001395.
45. Protein level and heavy metals (Pb, Cr, and Cd) concentrations in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and in oat (Avena sativa) plants
46. Assessing the possible use of hulled and naked oat grains as energy source
47. Proszak-Miąsik, D., Jarecki, W., and Nowak, K. (2022). Selected parameters of oat straw as an alternative energy raw material. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15010331 ↗
48. Growth patterns of bacterial communities in the rhizoplane and rhizosphere of with clover (Trifolium repens L.) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) in long-term pasture10.1016/S0929-1393(97)00015-2 ↗
49. The use of colony development for the characterization of bacterial communities in soil and on roots
50. Baćmaga, M., Wyszkowska, J., and Kucharski, J. (2025). Influence of prosulfocarb and polymer supplementation on soil bacterial diversity in Triticum aestivum L. cultivation. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 26.10.3390/ijms26125452 ↗
51. Baćmaga, M., Wyszkowska, J., and Kucharski, J. (2024). Response of soil microbiota, enzymes, and plants to the fungicide azoxystrobin. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25.10.3390/ijms25158104 ↗
52. Borowik, A., Wyszkowska, J., Zaborowska, M., and Kucharski, J. (2025). Regulation of the microbiome in soil contaminated with diesel oil and gasoline. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 26.10.3390/ijms26136491 ↗
53. Long-term ecological restoration increased plant diversity and soil total phosphorus content of the alpine flowing sand land in Northwest Sichuan, China10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24035 ↗
54. Yang, X., Turmuhan, R.-G., Wang, L., Li, J., and Wan, L. (2025). Five years of natural vegetation recovery in three forests of karst graben area and its effects on plant diversity and soil properties. Forests, 16.10.3390/f16010091 ↗
55. Using biodiversity indices effectively: Considerations for forest management10.3390/ecologies5010003 ↗
56. (2024, April 23). TIBCO Software Inc Statistica (Data Analysis Software System), Version 13. Available online: https://www.statistica.com.
57. TBtools-II: A “one for all, all for one” bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining10.1016/j.molp.2023.09.010 ↗
58. Tang, D., Chen, M., Huang, X., Zhang, G., Zeng, L., Zhang, G., Wu, S., and Wang, Y. (2023). SRplot: A free online platform for data visualization and graphing. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0294236 ↗
59. Effects of chromium stress on the rhizosphere microbial community composition of Cyperus alternifolius10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112253 ↗
60. Molecular toxicity of Cr (III) and Cr (VI) to defensive protein lysozyme and their differential mechanisms10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123151 ↗
61. Wyszkowska, J., Borowik, A., Zaborowska, M., and Kucharski, J. (2023). Sensitivity of Zea mays and soil microorganisms to the toxic effect of chromium (VI). Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms24010178 ↗
62. Effects of Cr stress on bacterial community structure and composition in rhizosphere soil of iris tectorum under different cultivation modes10.3390/microbiolres14010020 ↗
63. Hexavalent chromium reducing bacteria: Mechanism of reduction and characteristics10.1007/s11356-021-13325-7 ↗
64. Rahman, Z., and Thomas, L. (2021). Chemical-assisted microbially mediated chromium (Cr) (vi) reduction under the influence of various electron donors, redox mediators, and other additives: An outlook on enhanced Cr(vi) removal. Front. Microbiol., 11.10.3389/fmicb.2020.619766 ↗
65. Chromium (III) and chromium (VI) as important players in the induction of genotoxicity-current view
66. Sustainable enhancement of Cr (VI) bioreduction by the isolated Cr (VI)-resistant bacteria10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152433 ↗
67. Bai, X., Li, Y., Jing, X., Zhao, X., and Zhao, P. (2023). Response mechanisms of bacterial communities and nitrogen cycle functional genes in millet rhizosphere soil to chromium stress. Front. Microbiol., 14.10.3389/fmicb.2023.1116535 ↗
68. Enhanced microbial reduction of Cr(VI) in soil with biochar acting as an electron shuttle: Crucial role of redox-active moieties10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138601 ↗
69. Biosorption and biotransformation of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.050 ↗
70. Yan, G., Gao, Y., Xue, K., Qi, Y., Fan, Y., Tian, X., Wang, J., Zhao, R., Zhang, P., and Liu, Y. (2023). Toxicity mechanisms and remediation strategies for chromium exposure in the environment. Front. Environ. Sci., 11.10.3389/fenvs.2023.1131204 ↗
71. Cleaning chromium pollution in aquatic environments by bioremediation, photocatalytic remediation, electrochemical remediation and coupled remediation systems10.1007/s10311-019-00960-3 ↗
72. Chromate-reducing profile of bacterial strains isolated from industrial effluents10.15244/pjoes/61881 ↗
73. Evaluation of Cr (VI) reduction mechanism and removal by Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AR8, a novel haloalkaliphilic bacterium10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.037 ↗
74. Chromium resistance characteristics of Cr (VI) resistance genes ChrA and ChrB in Serratia sp. S210.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.079 ↗
75. Coupling enhancement of chromium (VI) bioreduction in groundwater by phosphorus minerals10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124896 ↗
76. Microbial strategies for effective hexavalent chromium removal: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.cej.2024.151457 ↗
77. Deciphering the impacts of chromium contamination on soil bacterial communities: A comparative analysis across various soil types10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119335 ↗
78. Ye, Y., Hao, R., Shan, B., Zhang, J., Li, J., and Lu, A. (2024). Mechanism of Cr(VI) removal by efficient Cr(VI)-resistant Bacillus mobilis CR3. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 40.10.1007/s11274-023-03816-9 ↗
79. Changes in the bacterial communities in chromium contaminated soils10.3389/fvets.2022.1066048 ↗
80. El-Sharkawy, G., Alotaibi, M.O., Zuhair, R., Mahmoud, E., El Baroudy, A., Omara, A.E.-D., and El-Sharkawy, M. (2025). Ecological assessment of polluted soils: Linking ecological risks, soil quality, and biota diversity in contaminated soils. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17041524 ↗
81. Bazzi, W., Abou Fayad, A.G., Nasser, A., Haraoui, L.-P., Dewachi, O., Abou-Sitta, G., Nguyen, V.-K., Abara, A., Karah, N., and Landecker, H. (2020). Heavy metal toxicity in armed conflicts potentiates AMR in A. baumannii by selecting for antibiotic and heavy metal co-resistance mechanisms. Front. Microbiol., 11.10.3389/fmicb.2020.00068 ↗
82. Effects of secondary release of chromium and vanadium on soil properties, nutrient cycling and bacterial communities in contaminated acidic paddy soil10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116725 ↗
83. Yan, X., Gao, B., Wang, J., Zhu, X., and Zhang, M. (2023). Insights into remediation effects and bacterial diversity of different remediation measures in rare earth mine soil with SO42− and heavy metals. Front. Microbiol., 14.10.3389/fmicb.2023.1050635 ↗
84. The variation in microbial community structure under different heavy metal contamination levels in paddy soils10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.057 ↗
85. Hexavalent chromium reduction ability and bioremediation potential of Aspergillus flavus CR500 isolated from electroplating wastewater10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124567 ↗
86. Insights into metal tolerance and resistance mechanisms in Trichoderma asperellum unveiled by de novo transcriptome analysis during bioleaching10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120734 ↗