Balancing Privacy and Utility in Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support: Empirical Evaluation Using De-Identified Electronic Health Record Data
Source abstract
Abstract
The secondary use of electronic health records is essential for developing artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems. However, even after direct identifiers are removed, de-identified electronic health records remain vulnerable to re-identification, membership inference attacks, and model extraction attacks. This study examined the balance between privacy protection and model utility by evaluating de-identification strategies and differentially private learning in large-scale electronic health records. De-identified records from a tertiary medical center were analyzed and compared with three strategies—baseline generalization, enhanced generalization, and enhanced generalization with suppression—together with differentially private stochastic gradient descent. Privacy risks were assessed through k-anonymity distributions, membership inference attacks, and model extraction attacks. Model performance was evaluated using standard predictive metrics, and privacy budgets were estimated for differentially private stochastic gradient descent. Enhanced generalization with suppression consistently improved k-anonymity distributions by reducing small, high-risk classes. Membership inference attacks remained at the chance level under all conditions, indicating that patient participation could not be inferred. Model extraction attacks closely replicated victim model outputs under baseline training but were substantially curtailed once differentially private stochastic gradient descent was applied. Notably, privacy-preserving learning maintained clinically relevant performance while mitigating privacy risks. Combining suppression with differentially private stochastic gradient descent reduced re-identification risk and markedly limited model extraction while sustaining predictive accuracy. These findings provide empirical evidence that a privacy–utility balance is achievable in clinical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Artificial Intelligence Big Data Medical Center, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju 26417, Republic of Korea
Department of Precision Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju 26417, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT)
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: A historical perspective10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61752-3 ↗
2. 70-year legacy of the Framingham Heart Study10.1038/s41569-019-0202-5 ↗
3. Cohort Profile: The Framingham Heart Study (FHS): Overview of milestones in cardiovascular epidemiology10.1093/ije/dyv337 ↗
4. The Nurses’ Health Study: Lifestyle and health among women10.1038/nrc1608 ↗
5. The Impact of the Nurses’ Health Study on Population Health: Prevention, Translation, and Control10.2105/AJPH.2016.303343 ↗
6. Zhang, Z., Yan, C., and Malin, B.A. (2022). Membership inference attacks against synthetic health data. J. Biomed. Inform., 125.10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103977 ↗
7. Differential Privacy Protection Against Membership Inference Attack on Machine Learning for Genomic Data
8. Defense against membership inference attack in graph neural networks through graph perturbation10.1007/s10207-022-00646-y ↗
9. Cobilean, V., Mavikumbure, H.S., Drake, D., Stuart, M., and Manic, M. (IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., 2025). Investigating Membership Inference Attacks against CNN Models for BCI Systems, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., in press.10.1109/JBHI.2025.3593443 ↗
10. Famili, A., and Lao, Y. (2023). Deep Neural Network Quantization Framework for Effective Defense against Membership Inference Attacks. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23187722 ↗
11. MiDA: Membership inference attacks against domain adaptation10.1016/j.isatra.2023.01.021 ↗
12. Liu, Y., Luo, J., Yang, Y., Wang, X., Gheisari, M., and Luo, F. (2023). ShrewdAttack: Low Cost High Accuracy Model Extraction. Entropy, 25.10.3390/e25020282 ↗
13. Qayyum, A., Ijaz, A., Usama, M., Iqbal, W., Qadir, J., Elkhatib, Y., and Al-Fuqaha, A. (2020). Securing Machine Learning in the Cloud: A Systematic Review of Cloud Machine Learning Security. Front. Big Data, 3.10.3389/fdata.2020.587139 ↗
14. Boenisch, F. (2021). A Systematic Review on Model Watermarking for Neural Networks. Front. Big Data, 4.10.3389/fdata.2021.729663 ↗
15. Han, D., Babaei, R., Zhao, S., and Cheng, S. (2024). Exploring the Efficacy of Learning Techniques in Model Extraction Attacks on Image Classifiers: A Comparative Study. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14093785 ↗
16. Ni, Z., and Zhou, Q. (2025). Differential Privacy in Federated Learning: An Evolutionary Game Analysis. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15062914 ↗
17. Tayyeh, H.K., and AL-Jumaili, A.S.A. (2024). Balancing Privacy and Performance: A Differential Privacy Approach in Federated Learning. Computers, 13.10.3390/computers13110277 ↗
18. Zhang, S., Hagermalm, A., Slavnic, S., Schiller, E.M., and Almgren, M. (2023). Evaluation of Open-Source Tools for Differential Privacy. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23146509 ↗
19. Namatevs, I., Sudars, K., Nikulins, A., and Ozols, K. (2025). Privacy Auditing in Differential Private Machine Learning: The Current Trends. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15020647 ↗
20. Chu, Z., He, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., and Zhu, N. (2023). Differential Privacy High-Dimensional Data Publishing Based on Feature Selection and Clustering. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12091959 ↗
21. Zheng, L., Cao, Y., Yoshikawa, M., Shen, Y., Rashed, E.A., Taura, K., Hanaoka, S., and Zhang, T. (2025). Sensitivity-Aware Differential Privacy for Federated Medical Imaging. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25092847 ↗
22. Hernandez-Matamoros, A., and Kikuchi, H. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Local Differential Privacy Schemes in Healthcare Datasets. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14072864 ↗
23. Yu, J.-X., Xu, Y.-H., Hua, M., Yu, G., and Zhou, W. (2025). Enhancing Privacy-Preserving Network Trace Synthesis Through Latent Diffusion Models. Information, 16.10.3390/info16080686 ↗
24. Zhang, Z., Ma, X., and Ma, J. (2023). Local Differential Privacy Based Membership-Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning for Deep-Learning-Driven Remote Sensing. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15205050 ↗
25. Aloqaily, A., Abdallah, E.E., Al-Zyoud, R., Abu Elsoud, E., Al-Hassan, M., and Abdallah, A.E. (2025). Deep Learning Framework for Advanced De-Identification of Protected Health Information. Future Internet, 17.10.3390/fi17010047 ↗
26. Shahid, A., Bazargani, M.H., Banahan, P., Mac Namee, B., Kechadi, T., Treacy, C., Regan, G., and MacMahon, P. (2022). A Two-Stage De-Identification Process for Privacy-Preserving Medical Image Analysis. Healthcare, 10.10.3390/healthcare10050755 ↗
27. Baumgartner, M., Kreiner, K., Wiesmüller, F., Hayn, D., Puelacher, C., and Schreier, G. (2024). Masketeer: An Ensemble-Based Pseudonymization Tool with Entity Recognition for German Unstructured Medical Free Text. Future Internet, 16.10.3390/fi16080281 ↗
28. Mosteiro, P., Wang, R., Scheepers, F., and Spruit, M. (2025). Investigating De-Identification Methodologies in Dutch Medical Texts: A Replication Study of Deduce and Deidentify. Electronics, 14.10.3390/electronics14081636 ↗
29. Sousa, S., Jantscher, M., Kröll, M., and Kern, R. (2025). Large Language Models for Electronic Health Record De-Identification in English and German. Information, 16.10.3390/info16020112 ↗
30. De-identification of free text data containing personal health information: A scoping review of reviews
31. Deidentification of free-text medical records using pre-trained bidirectional transformers10.1145/3368555.3384455 ↗
32. A certified de-identification system for all clinical text documents for information extraction at scale10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad045 ↗
33. Rempe, M., Heine, L., Seibold, C., Hörst, F., and Kleesiek, J. (Eur. Radiol., 2025). De-identification of medical imaging data: A comprehensive tool for ensuring patient privacy, Eur. Radiol., in press.10.1007/s00330-025-11695-x ↗
34. Liang, B., Qin, W., and Liao, Z. (2025). A Differential Evolutionary-Based XGBoost for Solving Classification of Physical Fitness Test Data of College Students. Mathematics, 13.10.3390/math13091405 ↗
35. Wen, H.-T., Wu, H.-Y., and Liao, K.-C. (2022). Using XGBoost Regression to Analyze the Importance of Input Features Applied to an Artificial Intelligence Model for the Biomass Gasification System. Inventions, 7.10.3390/inventions7040126 ↗
36. Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, C., and Zhou, J. (2025). Application of XGBoost Model Optimized by Multi-Algorithm Ensemble in Predicting FRP-Concrete Interfacial Bond Strength. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18122868 ↗
37. Impact of Data Pre-Processing Techniques on XGBoost Model Performance for Predicting All-Cause Readmission and Mortality Among Patients with Heart Failure10.3390/biomedinformatics4040118 ↗
38. Dong, T., Oronti, I.B., Sinha, S., Freitas, A., Zhai, B., Chan, J., Fudulu, D.P., Caputo, M., and Angelini, G.D. (2024). Enhancing Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: Development of an Advanced Xgboost Model with Hospital-Level Random Effects. Bioengineering, 11.10.20944/preprints202409.0698.v1 ↗
39. Amjad, M., Ahmad, I., Ahmad, M., Wróblewski, P., Kamiński, P., and Amjad, U. (2022). Prediction of Pile Bearing Capacity Using XGBoost Algorithm: Modeling and Performance Evaluation. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12042126 ↗
40. Sun, Z., Huang, Y., Zhang, A., Li, C., Jiang, L., Liao, X., Li, R., and Wan, J. (2025). Hybrid Uncertainty Metrics-Based Privacy-Preserving Alternating Multimodal Representation Learning. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15105229 ↗
41. Latif MA, Iqbal MZ. Membership inference attack on differentially private block coordinate descent10.7717/peerj-cs.1616 ↗
42. Analysis of Application Examples of Differential Privacy in Deep Learning10.1155/2021/4244040 ↗
43. Xia, F., Liu, Y., Jin, B., Yu, Z., Cai, X., Li, H., Zha, Z., Hou, D., and Peng, K. (2024). Leveraging Multiple Adversarial Perturbation Distances for Enhanced Membership Inference Attack in Federated Learning. Symmetry, 16.10.3390/sym16121677 ↗
44. Privacy preserving strategies for electronic health records in the era of large language models10.1038/s41746-025-01429-0 ↗
45. Rathee, G., Singh, A., Singal, G., and Tomar, A. (Knowl. Inf. Syst., 2025). A distributed classification and prediction model using federated learning in healthcare, Knowl. Inf. Syst., in press.10.1007/s10115-025-02525-z ↗
46. Privacy preservation for federated learning in health care10.1016/j.patter.2024.100974 ↗
47. Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H.B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., and Zhang, L. (2016, January 24–28). Deep learning with differential privacy. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), Vienna, Austria.10.1145/2976749.2978318 ↗
48. Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., and Shmatikov, V. (2017, January 22–26). Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P), San Jose, CA, USA.10.1109/SP.2017.41 ↗
49. Targeted biallelic integration of an inducible Caspase 9 suicide gene in iPSCs for safer therapies10.1016/j.omtm.2022.05.011 ↗
50. Artificial intelligence for brain disease diagnosis using electroencephalogram signals10.1631/jzus.B2400103 ↗
51. Optimal noise adding mechanisms for approximate differential privacy10.1109/TIT.2015.2504972 ↗
52. Stacey, T., Li, L., Ercan, G.M., Wang, W., and Yu, L. (2019). Effects of differential privacy and data skewness on membership inference vulnerability. arXiv.