Show source-provided references
1. Orr, R., Pope, R., Lopes, T.J.A., Leyk, D., Blacker, S., Bustillo-Aguirre, B.S., and Knapik, J.J. (2021). Soldier Load Carriage, Injuries, Rehabilitation and Physical Conditioning: An International Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.
10.3390/ijerph18084010 ↗3. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in the military: A qualitative systematic review of the literature from the past two decades and a new prioritizing injury model
4. Moreno, J.C. (2022). Exoskeletons for Unarmed Military Use: Requirements and Approaches to Support Human Movements Using an Example of Protection Against Unknown CBRN Dangers. Wearable Robotics, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wearable Robotics, WeRob2020, and of WearRAcon Europe 2020, Online, 13–16 October 2020, Springer International Publishing AG. International Symposium on Wearable, Robotics.
5. Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V. (2020). Exoskelette für den industriellen Kontext: Systematisches Review und Klassifikation. Digitale Arbeit, Digitaler Wandel, Digitaler Mensch? 66. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft, Berlin, GfA-Press.
6. Cooper, R.A., Smolinski, G., Candiotti, J.L., Satpute, S., Grindle, G.G., Sparling, T.L., Nordstrom, M.J., Yuan, X., Symsack, A., and Dae Lee, C. (2024). Current State, Needs, and Opportunities for Wearable Robots in Military Medical Rehabilitation and Force Protection. Actuators, 13.
10.3390/act13070236 ↗8. Mazal, J., Fagiolini, A., Vasik, P., Turi, M., Bruzzone, A., Pickl, S., Neumann, V., and Stodola, P. (2022). Current State and Design Recommendations of Exoskeletons of Lower Limbs in Military Applications. Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems: 8th International Conference, MESAS 2021, Virtual Event, 13–14 October 2021, Revised Selected Papers, Springer International Publishing. [1st ed.].
10.1007/978-3-030-98260-7 ↗10. Tian, J., Wei, B., Luo, S., Yang, C., Chen, C., Liu, Y., Feng, J., Li, P., Zhu, H., and Yi, C. (2024). A Systematic Review of Occupational Shoulder Exoskeletons for Industrial Use: Mechanism Design, Actuators, Control, and Evaluation Aspects. Actuators, 13.
10.2139/ssrn.4837320 ↗11. Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., and Noy, I. Exoskeletons in Automotive Industry: Investigation into the Applicability Across Regions. Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021), Online, 13–18 June 2021, Volume III: Sector Based Ergonomics; Congress of the International Ergonomics Association.
14. Assessing the efficiency of exoskeletons in physical strain reduction by biomechanical simulation with AnyBody Modeling System
10.1017/wtc.2021.5 ↗15. Effects of an exoskeleton on muscle activity in tasks requiring arm elevation: Part I—Experiments in a controlled laboratory setting
16. Evaluating the advantages of passive exoskeletons and recommendations for design improvements
17. Electromyography-based fatigue assessment of an upper body exoskeleton during automotive assembly
10.1017/wtc.2022.20 ↗18. Ebrahimi, A. (2017, January 17–19). Stuttgart Exo-Jacket: An exoskeleton for industrial upper body applications. Proceedings of the 2017 10th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), Proceedings: International Hall, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
10.1109/HSI.2017.8005042 ↗19. Nagwekar, R., Sonnenschein, J., Latifi, S.M.M., Gökay, R., and Weidner, R. (2025, January 18–20). Biomechanical Study of Passive and Active Exoskeletons for Analyzing the Dependent Parameters for an Intelligent Control System. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), Kyoto, Japan.
10.1109/ICCAR64901.2025.11072999 ↗20. Maity, S., Singha, K., and Pandit, P. (2023). Design of a military protective suit against biological agents. Functional and Technical Textiles, Woodhead Publishing.
10.1016/B978-0-323-91593-9.00021-3 ↗21. Soldier protection in the defence system against weapons of mass destruction
22. Preethichandra, D.M.G., Piyathilaka, L., Sul, J.-H., Izhar, U., Samarasinghe, R., Arachchige, S.D., and de Silva, L.C. (2024). Passive and Active Exoskeleton Solutions: Sensors, Actuators, Applications, and Recent Trends. Sensors, 24.
10.3390/s24217095 ↗24. Wollesen, A.A., Schubert, T., Mattes, K., and Weidner, R. (2018, January 4–7). Assessment of shoulder asymmetry for the design of an exoskeleton. Proceedings of the Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Dublin, Ireland.
25. A new approach to monitoring exercise training
27. Haddad, M., Stylianides, G., Djaoui, L., Dellal, A., and Chamari, K. (2017). Session-RPE Method for Training Load Monitoring: Validity, Ecological Usefulness, and Influencing Factors. Front. Neurosci., 11.
10.3389/fnins.2017.00612 ↗29. The relationship between the respiratory quotient and the energy equivalent of oxygen during simultaneous glucose and lipid oxidation and lipogenesis
10.1111/j.1365-201X.1987.tb10613.x ↗30. Calculating metabolic energy expenditure across a wide range of exercise intensities: The equation matters
10.1139/apnm-2017-0781 ↗32. Correlations Between Biomechanical Variables and Subjective Measures of Satisfaction While Using a Passive Upper-Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Tasks in the Field
10.1109/THMS.2025.3532358 ↗33. Level of exoskeleton support influences shoulder elevation, external rotation and forearm pronation during simulated work tasks in females
10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103591 ↗34. Mashud, G., Hasan, S.K., and Alam, N. (2025). Advances in Control Techniques for Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Robots: A Systematic Review. Actuators, 14.
10.3390/act14030108 ↗35. Shoulder muscle activity and perceived comfort of industry workers using a commercial upper limb exoskeleton for simulated tasks
10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103718 ↗37. Effects of upper-limb exoskeleton on muscle activity in tasks requiring arm elevation: Part II—In-field experiments in construction industry settings
38. Experimental Evaluation of a Shoulder-Support Exoskeleton for Overhead Work: Influences of Peak Torque Amplitude, Task, and Tool Mass
10.1080/24725838.2019.1637799 ↗39. Schmalz, T., Schändlinger, J., Schuler, M., Bornmann, J., Schirrmeister, B., Kannenberg, A., and Ernst, M. (2019). Biomechanical and Metabolic Effectiveness of an Industrial Exoskeleton for Overhead Work. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.
10.3390/ijerph16234792 ↗