journal article·2025-10-06Open access

Physical Support of Soldiers During CBRN Scenarios with Exoskeletons

Tim Schubert, Robert Weidner

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

The physical demands of overhead tasks can lead to musculoskeletal strain, particularly in scenarios requiring prolonged arm elevation such as in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) operations. To address this, an active shoulder exoskeleton was developed that is compatible with CBRN protective gear. The aim of this laboratory study was to assess the biomechanical and physiological effects of the system during upper limb tasks representative of real-world applications, without the use of protective suits. Twenty-two male participants performed two tasks with and without the exoskeleton: (1) 5 kg lifting task and (2) repetitive spraying tasks with a spray lance. Muscle activity of the m. anterior deltoid was measured using surface electromyography, while energy expenditure was assessed via spiroergometry. The exoskeleton significantly reduced muscular demands in the anterior deltoid, with a decrease of up to 40% during the spraying task and 29% percent during lifting task. Additionally, oxygen consumption per kilogram of body mass decreased by 6.5 to 8.2% across tasks. Participants reported lower fatigue and greater task manageability when using the exoskeleton, particularly for sustained and semi-static overhead postures. The results demonstrate that the exoskeleton effectively reduces workload during upper limb tasks. These findings support its application not only for soldiers in contaminated environments but also in industrial settings involving overhead work. Future research will need to validate these effects under realistic CBRN conditions to confirm operational compatibility.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biomedical and Engineering Education · Quality and Safety in Healthcare · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory for Manufacturing Technology, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043 Hamburg, Germany

Chair for Automated and Autonomous Systems, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Bernhard-von-Cotta-Str. 4, 09599 Freiberg, Germany

Funding

dtec.bw—Digitalization and Technology Research Center of the Bundeswehr [project KIKU]. Dtec.bw is funded by the European Union—Next Generation EU · Bundeswehr Research Institute for Protective Technologies and NBC Protection [project: Entlastung beim Tragen von CBRN-Schutzausrüstung]

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Orr, R., Pope, R., Lopes, T.J.A., Leyk, D., Blacker, S., Bustillo-Aguirre, B.S., and Knapik, J.J. (2021). Soldier Load Carriage, Injuries, Rehabilitation and Physical Conditioning: An International Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18084010 ↗
2. A systematic literature review of evidence for the use of assistive exoskeletons in defence and security use cases10.1080/00140139.2022.2059106 ↗
3. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in the military: A qualitative systematic review of the literature from the past two decades and a new prioritizing injury model
4. Moreno, J.C. (2022). Exoskeletons for Unarmed Military Use: Requirements and Approaches to Support Human Movements Using an Example of Protection Against Unknown CBRN Dangers. Wearable Robotics, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wearable Robotics, WeRob2020, and of WearRAcon Europe 2020, Online, 13–16 October 2020, Springer International Publishing AG. International Symposium on Wearable, Robotics.
5. Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V. (2020). Exoskelette für den industriellen Kontext: Systematisches Review und Klassifikation. Digitale Arbeit, Digitaler Wandel, Digitaler Mensch? 66. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft, Berlin, GfA-Press.
6. Cooper, R.A., Smolinski, G., Candiotti, J.L., Satpute, S., Grindle, G.G., Sparling, T.L., Nordstrom, M.J., Yuan, X., Symsack, A., and Dae Lee, C. (2024). Current State, Needs, and Opportunities for Wearable Robots in Military Medical Rehabilitation and Force Protection. Actuators, 13.10.3390/act13070236 ↗
7. Exoskeleton Application to Military Manual Handling Tasks10.1177/0018720820957467 ↗
8. Mazal, J., Fagiolini, A., Vasik, P., Turi, M., Bruzzone, A., Pickl, S., Neumann, V., and Stodola, P. (2022). Current State and Design Recommendations of Exoskeletons of Lower Limbs in Military Applications. Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems: 8th International Conference, MESAS 2021, Virtual Event, 13–14 October 2021, Revised Selected Papers, Springer International Publishing. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-3-030-98260-7 ↗
9. A preliminary study of the military applications and future of individual exoskeletons10.1088/1742-6596/1507/10/102044 ↗
10. Tian, J., Wei, B., Luo, S., Yang, C., Chen, C., Liu, Y., Feng, J., Li, P., Zhu, H., and Yi, C. (2024). A Systematic Review of Occupational Shoulder Exoskeletons for Industrial Use: Mechanism Design, Actuators, Control, and Evaluation Aspects. Actuators, 13.10.2139/ssrn.4837320 ↗
11. Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., and Noy, I. Exoskeletons in Automotive Industry: Investigation into the Applicability Across Regions. Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021), Online, 13–18 June 2021, Volume III: Sector Based Ergonomics; Congress of the International Ergonomics Association.
12. Shoulder-Support Exoskeletons for Overhead Work: Current State, Challenges and Future Directions10.1109/TMRB.2023.3275761 ↗
13. Objective and Subjective Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Overhead Work10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2945368 ↗
14. Assessing the efficiency of exoskeletons in physical strain reduction by biomechanical simulation with AnyBody Modeling System10.1017/wtc.2021.5 ↗
15. Effects of an exoskeleton on muscle activity in tasks requiring arm elevation: Part I—Experiments in a controlled laboratory setting
16. Evaluating the advantages of passive exoskeletons and recommendations for design improvements
17. Electromyography-based fatigue assessment of an upper body exoskeleton during automotive assembly10.1017/wtc.2022.20 ↗
18. Ebrahimi, A. (2017, January 17–19). Stuttgart Exo-Jacket: An exoskeleton for industrial upper body applications. Proceedings of the 2017 10th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), Proceedings: International Hall, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.10.1109/HSI.2017.8005042 ↗
19. Nagwekar, R., Sonnenschein, J., Latifi, S.M.M., Gökay, R., and Weidner, R. (2025, January 18–20). Biomechanical Study of Passive and Active Exoskeletons for Analyzing the Dependent Parameters for an Intelligent Control System. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/ICCAR64901.2025.11072999 ↗
20. Maity, S., Singha, K., and Pandit, P. (2023). Design of a military protective suit against biological agents. Functional and Technical Textiles, Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-323-91593-9.00021-3 ↗
21. Soldier protection in the defence system against weapons of mass destruction
22. Preethichandra, D.M.G., Piyathilaka, L., Sul, J.-H., Izhar, U., Samarasinghe, R., Arachchige, S.D., and de Silva, L.C. (2024). Passive and Active Exoskeleton Solutions: Sensors, Actuators, Applications, and Recent Trends. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24217095 ↗
23. Evaluation of a Novel Active Exoskeleton for Tasks at or Above Head Level10.1109/LRA.2018.2812905 ↗
24. Wollesen, A.A., Schubert, T., Mattes, K., and Weidner, R. (2018, January 4–7). Assessment of shoulder asymmetry for the design of an exoskeleton. Proceedings of the Congress of the European College of Sport Science (ECSS), Dublin, Ireland.
25. A new approach to monitoring exercise training
26. Validity and reliability of the session RPE method for monitoring exercise training intensity10.17159/2078-516X/2006/v18i1a247 ↗
27. Haddad, M., Stylianides, G., Djaoui, L., Dellal, A., and Chamari, K. (2017). Session-RPE Method for Training Load Monitoring: Validity, Ecological Usefulness, and Influencing Factors. Front. Neurosci., 11.10.3389/fnins.2017.00612 ↗
28. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping in Python10.1080/10255842.2010.527837 ↗
29. The relationship between the respiratory quotient and the energy equivalent of oxygen during simultaneous glucose and lipid oxidation and lipogenesis10.1111/j.1365-201X.1987.tb10613.x ↗
30. Calculating metabolic energy expenditure across a wide range of exercise intensities: The equation matters10.1139/apnm-2017-0781 ↗
31. An Occupational Shoulder Exoskeleton Reduces Muscle Activity and Fatigue During Overhead Work10.1109/TBME.2022.3159094 ↗
32. Correlations Between Biomechanical Variables and Subjective Measures of Satisfaction While Using a Passive Upper-Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Tasks in the Field10.1109/THMS.2025.3532358 ↗
33. Level of exoskeleton support influences shoulder elevation, external rotation and forearm pronation during simulated work tasks in females10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103591 ↗
34. Mashud, G., Hasan, S.K., and Alam, N. (2025). Advances in Control Techniques for Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Robots: A Systematic Review. Actuators, 14.10.3390/act14030108 ↗
35. Shoulder muscle activity and perceived comfort of industry workers using a commercial upper limb exoskeleton for simulated tasks10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103718 ↗
36. A novel passive shoulder exoskeleton for assisting overhead work10.1017/wtc.2023.1 ↗
37. Effects of upper-limb exoskeleton on muscle activity in tasks requiring arm elevation: Part II—In-field experiments in construction industry settings
38. Experimental Evaluation of a Shoulder-Support Exoskeleton for Overhead Work: Influences of Peak Torque Amplitude, Task, and Tool Mass10.1080/24725838.2019.1637799 ↗
39. Schmalz, T., Schändlinger, J., Schuler, M., Bornmann, J., Schirrmeister, B., Kannenberg, A., and Ernst, M. (2019). Biomechanical and Metabolic Effectiveness of an Industrial Exoskeleton for Overhead Work. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16234792 ↗