journal article·2025-10-05Open access

Seismic Performance Assessment of 170 kV Line Trap Systems Through Shake Table Testing and Finite Element Analysis

Fezayil Sunca

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

Line traps are critical components of power line carrier systems, enabling remote control signaling, voice communication, and inter-substation control within electrical transmission and distribution networks. Despite their importance, limited research has addressed their seismic performance, particularly under near-fault and far-fault ground motions. This study addresses this gap by experimentally and numerically evaluating a full-scale 170 kV line trap. Ambient Vibration Tests (AVTs), using Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition (EFDD), and shake table testing established its modal and seismic response characteristics. A finite element (FE) model was then developed and calibrated using the experimental results. Dynamic analyses were conducted to evaluate the structural response under both near-fault and far-fault ground motions. Experimental findings revealed that the seismic response of the line trap increased with height, with the upper segment experiencing over four times the base acceleration. Numerical analyses further demonstrated that near-fault ground motions induced significantly higher displacement and acceleration responses than far-fault records. These findings collectively constitute a detailed investigation into the seismic performance of a full-scale line trap, emphasizing the pivotal role of ground motion characteristics in the structural evaluation of substation apparatus.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Construction Technologies, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Türkiye

Earthquake and Structural Health Monitoring Research Center, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Türkiye

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Stearns, C.C., and Filiatrault, A. (2005). Electrical Substation Equipment Interaction: Experimental Rigid Conductor Studies, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
2. Seismic performance of industrial facilities affected by the 1999 Turkey earthquake10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:1(28) ↗
3. Seismic analysis of a 500-kV power transformer of the type damaged in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001145 ↗
4. Liu, R., Zhang, M., and Wu, Y. (2012, January 24–28). Vulnerability study of electric power grid in different intensity area in Wenchuan earthquake. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering (WCEE), Lisboa, Portugal.
5. Schiff, A.J. (1998). Guide to Improved Earthquake Performance of Electric Power Systems, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building and Fire Research Laboratory.10.1061/9780784404140 ↗
6. Ashrafi, S.A.H.N. (2003). Issues of Seismic Response and Retrofit for Critical Substation Equipment. [Doctoral Dissertation, New Jersey Institute of Technology].
7. Shake table test and finite element model for evaluating seismic performance of 220 kV transformer-bushing systems10.1177/87552930231177089 ↗
8. Wilcoski, J., and Smith, S.J. (1997). Fragility Testing of a Power Transformer Bushing, US Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratories. USA-CERL Technical Report 97/57.
9. Seismic response of transformer-bushing systems10.1109/TPWRD.2003.820215 ↗
10. Earthquake performance of porcelain transformer bushings10.1193/1.1647578 ↗
11. Experimental seismic response of high-voltage transformer-bushing systems10.1193/1.2044820 ↗
12. Seismic response of high voltage electrical transformer–bushing systems10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:2(287) ↗
13. Seismic response of high-voltage transformer-bushing systems incorporating flexural stiffeners II: Experimental study10.1193/072511EQS185M ↗
14. Response evaluation of interconnected electrical substation equipment using real-time hybrid simulation on multiple shaking tables10.1002/eqe.2767 ↗
15. Evaluation of power substation equipment seismic vulnerability by multivariate fragility analysis: A case study on a 420 kV circuit breaker10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.026 ↗
16. Seismic evaluation of ±800 kV UHVDC disconnect switch by shake table test10.1049/joe.2018.8646 ↗
17. Cavalieri, F., Donelli, G., Pinho, R., Dacarro, F., Bernardo, N., and de Nigris, M. (2022). Shake table testing of voltage and current transformers and numerical derivation of corresponding fragility curves. Infrastructures, 7.10.3390/infrastructures7120171 ↗
18. Shake table tests of steel towers supporting extremely long-span electricity transmission lines under spatially correlated ground motions10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.068 ↗
19. Shake table test and seismic fragility analysis of transmission tower-line system considering duration effect10.1016/j.tws.2024.111584 ↗
20. Real-time hybrid simulation in a shaking table configuration for parametric studies of high-voltage equipment and IEEE693 development10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.05.020 ↗
21. Structural performance of porcelain and polymer post insulators in high voltage electrical switches10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000848 ↗
22. Seismic qualification and time history shake-table testing of high voltage surge arrester under seismic qualification level moderate10.1080/23311916.2018.1431375 ↗
23. Seismic testing and modeling of cylindrical electrical equipment with GFRP composite insulators10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.036 ↗
24. Dinh, N.H., Lee, S.J., Kim, J.Y., and Choi, K.K. (2020). Study on seismic performance of a mold transformer through shaking table tests. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10010361 ↗
25. Shaking Table Test on Seismic Performance of Combined High Voltage Circuit Breaker
26. Seismic fragilities of high-voltage substation disconnect switches10.1193/030118EQS049M ↗
27. A maximum-entropy-based multivariate seismic vulnerability analysis method for power facilities: A case study on a ±1100-kV dry type smoothing reactor10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106740 ↗
28. Experimental study on influence of soil–structure interaction on seismic performance of UHV transformer10.1080/13632469.2022.2121792 ↗
29. Seismic failure risk analysis of ±800 kV coupling filter circuit considering material strength deviation10.1016/j.istruc.2022.12.022 ↗
30. Seismic retrofitting of an HV circuit breaker using base isolation with wire ropes. Part 1: Preliminary tests and analyses10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.032 ↗
31. Seismic retrofitting of an HV circuit breaker using base isolation with wire ropes. Part 2: Shaking-table test validation10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.031 ↗
32. Seismic risk mitigation of cylindrical electrical equipment with a novel isolation device10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.001 ↗
33. Combined horizontal–vertical seismic isolation system for high-voltage–power transformers: Development, testing and validation10.1007/s10518-018-0311-2 ↗
34. Seismic mitigation of substation cable connected equipment using friction pendulum systems
35. Takhirov, S., Kempner, L., Riley, M., Fujisaki, E., and Low, B. (2019, January 24–26). Seismic protection of high-voltage equipment by friction dampers: Numerical modelling correlated with full-scale component tests. Proceedings of the COMPDYN-2019, 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete, Greece.10.7712/120119.7303.19317 ↗
36. Numerical investigation of the seismic response of a UHV composite bypass switch retrofitted with wire rope isolators10.1007/s11803-021-2019-6 ↗
37. Seismic retrofit of 3000 kVA power transformer using friction dampers and prestressed tendons10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.029 ↗
38. Zhang, R., Cao, M., and Huang, J. (2022). Study on seismic response and parameter influence in a transformer–bushing with inerter isolation system. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12050530 ↗
39. Seismic performance improvement using bolt-on isolators on interconnected slender electrical equipment10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116238 ↗
40. Study on three-dimensional dynamic stability of open-pit high slope under blasting vibration10.2113/2022/6426550 ↗
41. Post-earthquake damage assessments of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings by shake table test and numerical visualization10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106858 ↗
42. Türkay, A. (2025). Determination of Dynamic Characteristics of Composite Cantilever Beams Using Experimental and Analytical Methods. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15101608 ↗
43. Experimental evaluation of damage effect on dynamic characteristics of concrete encased composite column-beam connections10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.030 ↗
44. Jacobsen, N.J., Andersen, P., and Brincker, R. (2006, January 18–20). Using enhanced frequency domain decomposition as a robust technique to harmonic excitation in operational modal analysis. Proceedings of the ISMA2006: International Conference on Noise & Vibration Engineering, Leuven, Belgium.
45. Bendat, J.S., and Piersol, A.G. (2004). Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, John Wiley and Sons. [3rd ed.].
46. Brincker, R., Zhang, L., and Andersen, P. (2000, January 7–10). Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. Proceedings of the 18th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), San Antonio, TX, USA.10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303 ↗
47. (2021). PULSE, Structural Vibration Solution. PULSE Operational Modal Analysis Software.
48. Shake table tests on the two-storey dry-joint stone masonry structures reinforced with timber laces and steel wires10.1007/s10518-018-00528-6 ↗
49. Two-way bending out-of-plane collapse of a full-scale URM building tested on a shake table10.1007/s10518-018-0507-5 ↗
50. Shake table tests on story-to-story pounding between adjacent RC buildings10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107544 ↗
51. Mayorca, P., Sathiparan, N., Guragain, R., and Meguro, K. (2006, January 16–17). Comparison of the seismic performance of different strength masonry structures retrofitted with PP-band meshes. In Proceeding of the 5th International Symposium on New Technologies for Urban Safety of Mega Cities in Asia, Phuket, Thailand.
52. Jeon, B.G., Chang, S.J., Kim, S.W., Park, D.U., and Chun, N. (2024). Experimental study on the acceleration amplification ratio of cable terminations for electric power facilities. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17225641 ↗
53. Comparison of near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on geometrically nonlinear earthquake behavior of suspension bridges10.1007/s11069-012-0259-5 ↗
54. Non-linear seismic response of concrete gravity dams to near-fault ground motions including dam-water-sediment-foundation interaction10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.019 ↗
55. Seismic response of embankment dams under near-fault and far-field ground motion excitation10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.02.008 ↗
56. Effect of near-fault and far-fault earthquakes on a historical masonry mosque through 3D dynamic soil-structure interaction10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.031 ↗
57. Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.014 ↗
58. Response and fragility of long-span truss structures in ultra-high voltage substation subjected to near-fault pulse-like and far-field ground motions10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106363 ↗
59. FEMA P695 (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
60. PEER (2025, June 04). Peer Strong Ground Motion Database. Available online: https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
61. Comparison of near-and far-fault ground motion effect on the nonlinear response of dam–reservoir–foundation systems10.1007/s11071-009-9508-x ↗
62. Microtremor measurements and 3D dynamic soil–structure interaction analysis for a historical masonry arch bridge under the effects of near-and far-fault earthquakes10.1007/s12665-020-09086-0 ↗
63. Post-earthquake damage assessments of historic mosques and effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on seismic responses10.1080/15583058.2021.2011475 ↗
64. Modal parameter identification and seismic assessment of historical timber structures under near-fault and far-fault ground motions10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.143 ↗
65. Influence of high-temperature treatment on strength and failure behaviors of a quartz-rich sandstone under true triaxial condition10.2113/2022/3086647 ↗
66. Dynamic characteristics changes of masonry arches exposed to elevated temperature10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135423 ↗
67. Shaking table test and numerical analysis of dynamic coupling effect between suspended system and OLF100010.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110224 ↗
68. Finite element modeling and assessment of seismic response of electrical substations porcelain post insulators10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106895 ↗
69. Axial compressive behaviors of multi-cavity concrete-filled double-skin tubular stub columns10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.108619 ↗