MRI Boundary-Aware Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Using a Novel Mahalanobis Distance Map
Source abstract
Abstract
The accurate segmentation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosis, disease monitoring, and therapeutic assessment. Despite the significant advances in deep learning-based segmentation, the current boundary-aware approaches are limited by their reliance on spatial distance transforms, which fail to fully exploit the rich texture and intensity information inherent in MRI data. This limitation is particularly problematic in regions where MS lesions and normal-appearing white matter exhibit overlapping intensity distributions, resulting in ambiguous boundaries and reduced segmentation accuracy. To address these challenges, we propose a novel Mahalanobis distance map (MDM) and a corresponding Mahalanobis distance loss, which generalize traditional distance transforms by incorporating spatial coordinates, the FLAIR intensity, and radiomic texture features into a unified feature space. Our method leverages the covariance structure of these features to better distinguish ambiguous regions near lesion boundaries, mimicking the texture-aware reasoning of expert radiologists. Experimental evaluation on the ISBI-MS and MSSEG datasets demonstrates that our approach achieves superior performance in both boundary quality metrics (HD95, ASSD) and overall segmentation accuracy (Dice score, precision) compared to state-of-the-art methods. These results highlight the potential of texture-integrated distance metrics to overcome MS lesion segmentation difficulties, providing more reliable and reproducible assessments for MS management and research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Brain Tumor Detection and Classification · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques · Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Informática, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso 2390123, Chile
School of Biomedical Engineering, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362905, Chile
Center of Interdisciplinary Biomedical and Engineering Research for Health-MEDING, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362905, Chile
Funding
ANID · Project DGIIP-UTFSM
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Multiple sclerosis—A review10.1111/ene.13819 ↗
2. Multiple sclerosis: A narrative overview of current pharmacotherapies and emerging treatment prospects10.1007/s43440-024-00642-0 ↗
3. Effective Utilization of MRI in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis10.1016/j.ncl.2017.08.013 ↗
4. A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion10.1016/j.array.2019.100004 ↗
5. MRI FLAIR lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis: Does automated segmentation hold up with manual annotation?10.1016/j.nicl.2016.11.020 ↗
6. Automatic segmentation of spinal cord lesions in MS: A robust tool for axial T2-weighted MRI scans
7. Basaran, B., Matthews, P., and Bai, W. (2022). New lesion segmentation for multiple sclerosis brain images with imaging and lesion-aware augmentation. Front. Neurosci., 16.10.3389/fnins.2022.1007453 ↗
8. Freire, P.G.L., and Ferrari, R.J. (2018). Multiple sclerosis lesion enhancement and white matter region estimation using hyperintensities in FLAIR images. arXiv.10.1016/j.bspc.2018.12.021 ↗
9. How far MS lesion detection and segmentation are integrated into the clinical workflow? A systematic review10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103491 ↗
10. Survey of automated multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation techniques on magnetic resonance imaging10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.10.002 ↗
11. Multi-view longitudinal CNN for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation10.1016/j.engappai.2017.06.006 ↗
12. Improving automated multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation with a cascaded 3D convolutional neural network approach10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.034 ↗
13. Belwal, P., and Singh, S. (2025). Deep Learning techniques to detect and analysis of multiple sclerosis through MRI: A systematic literature review. Comput. Biol. Med., 185.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109530 ↗
14. Medical Image Segmentation Review: The Success of U-Net10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3435571 ↗
15. Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., and Frangi, A.F. (2015, January 5–9). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9 ↗
16. Gallardo, C.A.Z., Herrera, M.F.G., Acosta, A.V., Flores, D.A.M., Santos, O.A.V., Avalos, J.M.S., del Carmen Perez Careta, M., and Careta, E.P. (2018, January 16–20). 3D Multiple Sclerosis Image Analysis Based on Probabilistic Methods for a 4F Array. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Optics/Laser Science, Washington, DC, USA.10.1364/FIO.2018.JTu2A.139 ↗
17. A Convolutional Neural Network model for identifying Multiple Sclerosis on brain FLAIR MRI
18. Yılmaz Acar, Z., Başçiftçi, F., and Ekmekci, A.H. (2022). Future activity prediction of multiple sclerosis with 3D MRI using 3D discrete wavelet transform. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 78.10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103940 ↗
19. Generalised Dice Overlap as a Deep Learning Loss Function for Highly Unbalanced Segmentations
20. Reducing the Hausdorff Distance in Medical Image Segmentation With Convolutional Neural Networks10.1109/TMI.2019.2930068 ↗
21. How Distance Transform Maps Boost Segmentation CNNs: An Empirical Study
22. Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentation10.1016/j.media.2020.101851 ↗
23. Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Cui, M., Liu, J., Ren, P., Yang, Y., Xie, X., Hua, X., Bao, H., and Xu, W. (2021, January 11–15). Active Boundary Loss for Semantic Segmentation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Virtual.
24. Introduction to Radiomics10.2967/jnumed.118.222893 ↗
25. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical LASSO10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045 ↗
26. Frery, A.C., and Perciano, T. (2013). Introduction to Image Processing Using R: Learning by Examples, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-4950-7 ↗
27. Asymmetric Loss Functions and Deep Densely-Connected Networks for Highly-Imbalanced Medical Image Segmentation: Application to Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2886371 ↗
28. Jadon, S. (2020, January 27–29). A survey of loss functions for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB), Viña del Mar, Chile.10.1109/CIBCB48159.2020.9277638 ↗
29. Yi-de, M., Qing, L., and Zhi-bai, Q. (2004, January 20–22). Automated image segmentation using improved PCNN model based on cross-entropy. Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Intelligent Multimedia, Video and Speech Processing, Hong Kong, China.
30. Milletari, F., Navab, N., and Ahmadi, S.A. (2016, January 25–28). V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), Stanford, CA, USA.10.1109/3DV.2016.79 ↗
31. Boundary-Sensitive Loss Function With Location Constraint for Hard Region Segmentation10.1109/JBHI.2022.3222390 ↗
32. Conditional Boundary Loss for Semantic Segmentation10.1109/TIP.2023.3290519 ↗
33. Varmuza, K., and Filzmoser, P. (2009). Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis in Chemometrics, Academic Press. [1st ed.].10.32614/CRAN.package.chemometrics ↗
34. Textural Features for Image Classification10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 ↗
35. Texture analysis using gray level run lengths10.1016/S0146-664X(75)80008-6 ↗
36. Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: Resource and challenge10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.064 ↗
37. Commowick, O., Istace, A., Kain, M., Laurent, B., Leray, F., Simon, M., Pop, S.C., Girard, P., Améli, R., and Ferré, J.C. (2018). Objective Evaluation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation using a Data Management and Processing Infrastructure. Sci. Rep., 8.10.1038/s41598-018-31911-7 ↗
39. PyTorch 2: Faster Machine Learning Through Dynamic Python Bytecode Transformation and Graph Compilation
40. Cruz, P., Ulloa, G., Martín, D.S., and Veloz, A. (2023, January 23–26). Software Architecture Evaluation of a Machine Learning Enabled System: A Case Study. Proceedings of the 2023 42nd IEEE International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC), Concepción, Chile.10.1109/SCCC59417.2023.10315755 ↗
41. Nai, Y.H., Teo, B.W., Tan, N.L., O’Doherty, S., Stephenson, M.C., Thian, Y.L., Chiong, E., and Reilhac, A. (2021). Comparison of metrics for the evaluation of medical segmentations using prostate MRI dataset. Comput. Biol. Med., 134.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104497 ↗
42. Oktay, O., Schlemper, J., Folgoc, L.L., Lee, M., Heinrich, M., Misawa, K., Mori, K., McDonagh, S., Hammerla, N.Y., and Kainz, B. (2018). Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas. arXiv.