journal article·2025-10-01Open access

Prediction and Reliability Analysis of the Pressuremeter Modulus of the Deep Overburden in Hydraulic Engineering Based on Machine Learning and Physical Mechanisms

Hanyu Guo, Deshan Cui, Qingchun Li, Qiong Chen, Lin Lai

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

In the process of large-scale water conservancy and hydropower station construction in the southwest region of China, obtaining the deep overburden pressuremeter modulus Em is of great significance for the calculation of foundation bearing capacity and dam foundation settlement. However, due to the complex nature of the soil properties in deep overburden layers, conducting deep-hole pressuremeter tests is challenging, time-consuming, and costly. In order to efficiently and accurately obtain the pressuremeter modulus of deep overburden, this paper takes the deep overburden in the river valley where a large hydropower station dam is located in the southwest region as the research object. It proposes a method based on data-driven prediction of the pressuremeter modulus and combines it with the physical mechanism to carry out the reliability analysis of the prediction results. By constructing a database of soil physical and mechanical parameters, including the pressuremeter modulus, the prediction performance of Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and BP Neural Network on the pressure modulus was evaluated. The Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) was utilized for hyperparameter optimization to enhance the reliability of prediction results. The results indicate that the RF and PSO-RF models exhibit a comprehensive advantage for accurately predicting the pressuremeter modulus. The prediction results of the model for new data have a strong correlation with the results calculated by the Menard formula, which demonstrates the reliability of the model. Therefore, establishing the relationship between the conventional physical and mechanical parameters of deep overburden and the pressuremeter modulus, and predicting the pressuremeter modulus based on data-driven methods, has significant engineering value for obtaining the pressuremeter modulus of deep overburden efficiently, economically, and reliably. It also holds significant importance for the extended application of machine learning in the field of soil parameter prediction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Control Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu 610072, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Study on the dynamic characteristics of dam foundation on deep riverbed overburden with soft soil layer
2. Seismic safety evaluation of foundation gallery of rockfill dam on deep overburden
3. Review of suffusion in deep alluvium foundation
4. Zhang, S., Li, Q., Liu, S., Cui, D., Li, H., Li, W., and Chen, P. (2025). A state-of-the-art review on the borehole in-situ testing techniques in deep overburden layer. Rock Soil Mech., 1–20.
5. Strength classification and evaluation method for saturated loess using pressuremeter test method
6. Determination of the deformation modulus of dispersible-intercalated-jointed cherts using the Menard pressuremeter test10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.11.004 ↗
7. Prediction of pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils by simple and non-linear multiple regression techniques: A case study from Mersin, Turkey10.1007/s12665-011-1439-4 ↗
8. Analyse des résultats pressiométriques Ménard dans un diagramme spectral [Log (pLM), Log (EM/pLM)] et utilisation des regroupements statistiques dans la modélisation d’un site
9. Understanding the stiffness of soils in Singapore from pressuremeter testing
10. Biarez, J., Gambin, M., Gomes-Correia, A., Flavigny, E., and Branque, D. (1998). Using Pressuremeter to Obtain Parameters to Elastic-Plastic Models for Sands, A.A. Balkema Brookfield.
11. A study of the pressuremeter modulus and its comparison to the elastic modulus of soil
12. Probabilistic slope stability analysis of Heavy-haul freight corridor using a hybrid machine learning paradigm10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100815 ↗
13. A predictive model based on an optimized ANN combined with ICA for predicting the stability of slopes10.1007/s00366-019-00702-7 ↗
14. Ahangari Nanehkaran, Y., Pusatli, T., Chengyong, J., Chen, J., Cemiloglu, A., Azarafza, M., and Derakhshani, R. (2022). Application of machine learning techniques for the estimation of the safety factor in slope stability analysis. Water, 14.10.3390/w14223743 ↗
15. Application of machine learning, deep learning and optimization algorithms in geoengineering and geoscience: Comprehensive review and future challenge10.1016/j.gr.2022.03.015 ↗
16. CPT-based method using hybrid artificial neural network and mathematical model to predict the load-settlement behaviour of shallow foundations10.1080/17486025.2020.1755459 ↗
17. Transient settlement estimation of shallow foundation under eccentrically inclined static and cyclic load on granular soil using artificial intelligence techniques10.1080/17486025.2022.2103187 ↗
18. Measurement and prediction of tunnelling-induced ground settlement in karst region by using expanding deep learning method10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109700 ↗
19. Erharter, G.H., Marcher, T., and Reinhold, C. (2019). Artificial Neural Network Based Online Rockmass Behavior Classification of Tbm Data, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-32029-4_16 ↗
20. Data acquisition-interpretation-aggregation for dynamic design of rock tunnel support10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104577 ↗
21. Optimized ANN model for predicting rock mass quality ahead of tunnel face using measure-while-drilling data10.1007/s10064-020-02057-6 ↗
22. Novel integration of extreme learning machine and improved Harris hawks optimization with particle swarm optimization-based mutation for predicting soil consolidation parameter10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.12.018 ↗
23. An evolutionary computational approach for formulation of compression index of fine-grained soils10.1016/j.engappai.2014.03.012 ↗
24. Prediction of compression index using artificial neural network
25. An advanced machine learning-based mathematical equation for predicting compression index from readily-available soil physical properties
26. Pore pressure prediction based on conventional well logs and seismic data using an advanced machine learning approach10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.09.049 ↗
27. Pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils using GMDH-type neural network and genetic algorithms10.1007/s10706-017-0314-9 ↗
28. Hybridizing four wise neural-metaheuristic paradigms in predicting soil shear strength10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107576 ↗
29. ANN prediction of some geotechnical properties of soil from their index parameters10.1007/s12517-014-1304-3 ↗
30. Prediction of compaction parameters for fine-grained soil: Critical comparison of the deep learning and standalone models10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.12.034 ↗
31. A Deep Learning Model for Predicting the Cement Soil Deformation Modulus10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c03160 ↗
32. Liu, C., Ku, C., Wu, T., and Ku, Y. (2024). An Advanced Soil Classification Method Employing the Random Forest Technique in Machine Learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14167202 ↗
33. Pham, B.T., Qi, C., Ho, L.S., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Al-Ansari, N., Nguyen, M.D., Nguyen, H.D., Ly, H., Le, H.V., and Prakash, I. (2020). A novel hybrid soft computing model using random forest and particle swarm optimization for estimation of undrained shear strength of soil. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12062218 ↗
34. Soil unconfined compressive strength prediction using random forest (RF) machine learning model10.2174/1874836802014010278 ↗
35. Ma, G., Chao, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., and Hu, H. (2018). The Application of Support Vector Machine in Geotechnical Engineering, IOP Publishing.10.1088/1755-1315/189/2/022055 ↗
36. Settlement prediction using support vector machine (SVM)-based compressibility models: A case study10.1007/s40999-019-00421-6 ↗
37. Geomechanical parameters identification by particle swarm optimization and support vector machine10.1016/j.apm.2009.01.011 ↗
38. Research on prediction model of geotechnical parameters based on BP neural network10.1007/s00521-018-3902-6 ↗
39. Applications of particle swarm optimization in geotechnical engineering: A comprehensive review10.1007/s10706-017-0356-z ↗
40. Geotechnical properties of BP-1 lunar regolith simulant10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000462 ↗
41. Optimization techniques for identifying soil parameters in geotechnical engineering: Comparative study and enhancement10.1002/nag.2714 ↗
42. Parameters optimization of geotechnical problem using different optimization algorithm10.1007/s10706-015-9898-0 ↗
43. Particle swarm optimization variants for solving geotechnical problems: Review and comparative analysis10.1007/s11831-020-09442-0 ↗
44. Random forest algorithm overview10.58496/BJML/2024/007 ↗
45. Cemiloglu, A., Zhu, L., Arslan, S., Xu, J., Yuan, X., Azarafza, M., and Derakhshani, R. (2023). Support vector machine (SVM) application for uniaxial compression strength (UCS) prediction: A case study for Maragheh limestone. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042217 ↗
46. A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019 ↗
47. Shao, W., Yue, W., Zhang, Y., Zhou, T., Zhang, Y., Dang, Y., Wang, H., Feng, X., and Chao, Z. (2023). The application of machine learning techniques in geotechnical engineering: A review and comparison. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11183976 ↗
48. Predication of displacement of tunnel rock mass based on the back-analysis method-BP neural network10.1007/s10706-021-01874-0 ↗
49. Correction of soil parameters in calculation of embankment settlement using a BP network back-analysis model10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.01.007 ↗
50. Li, J., Cheng, J., Shi, J., and Huang, F. (2012). Brief Introduction of Back Propagation (BP) Neural Network Algorithm and Its Improvement, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-30223-7_87 ↗
51. Particle swarm optimization (PSO). A tutorial10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.08.020 ↗
52. Particle swarm optimization: A comprehensive survey10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142859 ↗
53. A hybrid particle swarm optimization–back-propagation algorithm for feedforward neural network training
54. Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT data using random forest10.1007/s11069-015-1893-5 ↗
55. Tree-based techniques for predicting the compression index of clayey soils
56. Yu, H. (2013). Cavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics, Springer Science & Business Media.