Fusing Historical Records and Physics-Informed Priors for Urban Waterlogging Susceptibility Assessment: A Framework Integrating Machine Learning, Fuzzy Evaluation, and Decision Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Urban Waterlogging Susceptibility Assessment (UWSA) is vital for resilient urban planning and disaster preparedness. Conventional methods depend heavily on Historical Waterlogging Records (HWR), which are limited by their reliance on extreme rainfall events and prone to human omissions, resulting in spatial bias and incomplete coverage. While hydrodynamic models can simulate waterlogging scenarios, their large-scale application is restricted by the lack of accessible underground drainage data. Recently released flood control plans and risk maps provide valuable physics-informed priors (PI-Priors) that can supplement HWR for susceptibility modeling. This study introduces a dual-source integration framework that fuses HWR with PI-Priors to improve UWSA performance. PI-Priors rasters were vectorized to delineate two-dimensional waterlogging zones, and based on the Three-Way Decision (TWD) theory, a Multi-dimensional Connection Cloud Model (MCCM) with CRITIC-TOPSIS was employed to build an index system incorporating membership degree, credibility, and impact scores. High-quality samples were extracted and combined with HWR to create an enhanced dataset. A Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) model was then applied with 20 variables spanning natural conditions, social capital, infrastructure, and built environment. The results demonstrate that this framework increases sample adequacy, reduces spatial bias, and substantially improves the accuracy and generalizability of UWSA under extreme rainfall.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI · Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China · SEU Innovation Capability Enhancement Plan for Doctoral Students · Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province
References (88)
Show source-provided references
1. Comparison of fluvial and pluvial flood risk curves in urban cities derived from a large ensemble climate simulation dataset: A case study in Nagoya, Japan10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124706 ↗
2. Flood hazard mapping methods: A review10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126846 ↗
3. Zanuttigh, B., Nicholls, R.J., Vanderlinden, J.-P., Thompson, R.C., and Burcharth, H.F. (2014). Coastal Risk Management in a Changing Climate, Butterworth-Heinemann.
4. Enhancing flexibility and efficiency for urban waterlogging response scenarios simulation: An open-ended approach involving user participation10.1080/17538947.2025.2468420 ↗
5. Adapting cities to the surge: A comprehensive review of climate-induced urban flooding10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102123 ↗
6. Zhang, Z., Jian, X., Chen, Y., Huang, Z., Liu, J., Yang, L., Yao, K., Su, H., Torrenti, J., and Wen, Z. (2023). Urban waterlogging prediction and risk analysis based on rainfall time series features: A case study of Shenzhen. Front. Environ. Sci., 11.10.3389/fenvs.2023.1131954 ↗
7. Urban pluvial flooding and stormwater management: A contemporary review of China’s challenges and “sponge cities” strategy10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.016 ↗
8. Flood risk assessment of Wuhan, China, using a multi-criteria analysis model with the improved AHP-Entropy method10.1007/s11356-023-29066-8 ↗
9. Reflections on the Catastrophic 2020 Yangtze River Basin Flooding in Southern China
10. Zhao, X., Li, H., Cai, Q., Pan, Y., and Qi, Y. (2023). Managing Extreme Rainfall and Flooding Events: A Case Study of the 20 July 2021 Zhengzhou Flood in China. Climate, 11.10.3390/cli11110228 ↗
11. Yan, W., Ren, H., Luo, X., and Li, S. (2023). Multi-Dimensional Urban Flooding Impact Assessment Leveraging Social Media Data: A Case Study of the 2020 Guangzhou Rainstorm. Water, 15.10.3390/w15244296 ↗
12. Locally opposite responses of the 2023 Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei extreme rainfall event to global anthropogenic warming10.1038/s41612-024-00584-7 ↗
13. Bobrowsky, P.T. (2013). Susceptibility. Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4 ↗
14. Bobrowsky, P.T. (2013). Risk Assessment. Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4 ↗
15. Bobrowsky, P.T. (2013). Vulnerability. Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4 ↗
16. Beer, M., Kougioumtzoglou, I.A., Patelli, E., and Au, I.S.-K. (2021). A Beginner’s Guide to Fragility, Vulnerability, and Risk. Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
17. Coarse-to-fine waterlogging probability assessment based on remote sensing image and social media data10.1080/10095020.2020.1812445 ↗
18. Antwi-Agyakwa, K.T., Afenyo, M.K., and Angnuureng, D.B. (2023). Know to Predict, Forecast to Warn: A Review of Flood Risk Prediction Tools. Water, 15.10.3390/w15030427 ↗
19. Assessment of the vulnerability of road networks to urban waterlogging based on a coupled hydrodynamic model10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127105 ↗
20. Method for analyzing urban waterlogging mechanisms based on a 1D–2D water environment dynamic bidirectional coupling model10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121024 ↗
21. Identification of urban waterlogging risk zones using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): A case of Agartala city10.1007/s10661-025-13725-z ↗
22. Urban waterlogging resilience assessment based on combination weight and cloud model: A case study of Haikou10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107728 ↗
23. Identification of urban waterlogging indicators and risk assessment based on MaxEnt Model: A case study of Tianjin Downtown10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111354 ↗
24. Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.008 ↗
25. Flood vulnerability mapping and urban sprawl suitability using FR, LR, and SVM models10.1007/s11356-022-23140-3 ↗
26. Research progress and prospects of urban flooding simulation: From traditional numerical models to deep learning approaches10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106213 ↗
27. WaRENet: A Novel Urban Waterlogging Risk Evaluation Network
28. Simulation of Urban Flood Process Based on a Hybrid LSTM-SWMM Model10.1007/s11269-023-03600-2 ↗
29. Real-Time Waterlogging Monitoring on Urban Roads Using Edge Computing10.1007/s11269-025-04202-w ↗
30. Beijing Water Authority (2025, June 03). Waterlogging Risk Map for Suburban New Towns, Available online: https://swj.beijing.gov.cn/swdt/tzgg/202406/t20240627_3730100.html.
31. Huang, F., Zhu, D., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, N., and Dong, Z. (2024). Urban Flooding Disaster Risk Assessment Utilizing the MaxEnt Model and Game Theory: A Case Study of Changchun, China. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16198696 ↗
32. Urban waterlogging susceptibility assessment based on hybrid ensemble machine learning models: A case study in the metropolitan area in Beijing, China10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130695 ↗
33. Rainstorm-induced flood risk assessment in developed urban area using a data-driven approach with watershed units10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174135 ↗
34. Integrating machine learning with the Minimum Cumulative Resistance Model to assess the impact of urban land use on road waterlogging risk10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132842 ↗
35. Designing coupled LID–GREI urban drainage systems: Resilience assessment and decision-making framework10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155267 ↗
36. Exploring effective ways to increase reliable positive samples for machine learning-based urban waterlogging susceptibility assessments10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118682 ↗
37. Identifying dominant factors of waterlogging events in metropolitan coastal cities: The case study of Guangzhou, China10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110951 ↗
38. Assessing hydrological performance for optimized integrated grey-green infrastructure in response to climate change based on shared socio-economic pathways10.1016/j.scs.2023.104436 ↗
39. Mitigation of urban waterlogging from flash floods hazards in vulnerable watersheds10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101429 ↗
40. Analyzing the spatial scale effects of urban elements on urban flooding based on multiscale geographically weighted regression10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132178 ↗
41. Multi-stage planning of LID-GREI urban drainage systems in response to land-use changes10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160214 ↗
42. Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world10.1002/2016EF000485 ↗
43. Urbanization exacerbated the rainfall and flooding caused by hurricane Harvey in Houston10.1038/s41586-018-0676-z ↗
44. Urban waterlogging risk assessment in well-developed region of Eastern China10.1016/j.pce.2019.102824 ↗
45. Analysis of affected population vulnerability to rainstorms and its induced floods at county level: A case study of Zhejiang Province, China10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102976 ↗
46. Flood risk assessment in the Kosi megafan using multi-criteria decision analysis: A hydro-geomorphic approach10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106861 ↗
47. Urban agglomeration waterlogging hazard exposure assessment based on an integrated Naive Bayes classifier and complex network analysis10.1007/s11069-023-06118-3 ↗
48. Linking trends in urban extreme rainfall to urban flooding in China10.1002/joc.5107 ↗
49. Yan, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, N., and Feng, C. (2024). Development of an Integrated Urban Flood Model and Its Application in a Concave-Down Overpass Area. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16101650 ↗
50. Predicting future urban waterlogging-prone areas by coupling the maximum entropy and FLUS model10.1016/j.scs.2022.103812 ↗
51. Urban waterlogging control: A novel method to urban drainage pipes reconstruction, systematic and automated10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137950 ↗
52. Urban waterlogging structure risk assessment and enhancement10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120074 ↗
53. Li, L., Zhang, Z., Qi, X., Zhao, X., Hu, W., and Cai, R. (2023). Spatiotemporal Urban Waterlogging Risk Assessment Incorporating Human and Vehicle Distribution. Water, 15.10.3390/w15193452 ↗
54. Urban road waterlogging multi-level assessment integrated flood models and road network models10.1016/j.trd.2024.104305 ↗
55. A comparative study on urban waterlogging susceptibility assessment based on multiple data-driven models10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121166 ↗
56. Zou, B., Nie, Y., Liu, R., Wang, M., Li, J., Fan, C., and Zhou, X. (2025). Assessing the Impact of Urban Morphologies on Waterlogging Risk Using a Spatial Weight Naive Bayes Model and Local Climate Zones Classification. Water, 16.10.3390/w16172464 ↗
57. Wang, X., Zhang, Z., Hu, W., Zhao, X., Qi, X., and Cai, R. (2023). Vulnerability Assessment and Future Prediction of Urban Waterlogging—A Case Study of Fuzhou. Water, 15.10.3390/w15224025 ↗
58. Li, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, X., and Wang, W. (2023). Establishment and Application of a Specialized Physical Examination Indicator System for Urban Waterlogging Risk in China. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15064998 ↗
59. An XGBoost-SHAP approach to quantifying morphological impact on urban flooding susceptibility10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111137 ↗
60. Duan, C., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Lang, Q., Zhang, Y., Wu, C., and Zhang, Z. (2022). Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Urban Waterlogging Disaster Based on MCDA-GIS Integration: The Case Study of Changchun, China. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14133101 ↗
61. Assessing and enhancing urban road network resilience under rainstorm waterlogging disasters10.1016/j.trd.2023.103928 ↗
62. Economic loss of urban waterlogging based on an integrated drainage model and network environ analyses10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106923 ↗
63. Urban Flood Hazard Assessment Based on Machine Learning Model10.1007/s11269-024-04013-5 ↗
64. Potential reduction in urban runoff by green spaces in Beijing: A scenario analysis10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.014 ↗
65. Risk assessment of rainstorm disasters in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao greater Bay area of China during 1990–201810.1080/19475705.2021.2023224 ↗
66. UGS-1m: Fine-grained urban green space mapping of 31 major cities in China based on the deep learning framework10.5194/essd-15-555-2023 ↗
67. Assessment of urban flooding vulnerability based on AHP-PSR model: A case study in Jining City, China10.1080/10106049.2023.2252777 ↗
68. The spatial overlay effect of urban waterlogging risk and land use value10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174290 ↗
69. The 30m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 201910.5194/essd-13-3907-2021 ↗
70. Three-way decision and granular computing10.1016/j.ijar.2018.09.005 ↗
71. A novel multi-dimensional cloud model coupled with connection numbers theory for evaluation of slope stability10.1016/j.apm.2019.07.043 ↗
72. A new cognitive model: Cloud model10.1002/int.20340 ↗
73. Xiang, W., Yang, X., Babuna, P., and Bian, D. (2022). Development, Application and Challenges of Set Pair Analysis in Environmental Science from 1989 to 2020: A Bibliometric Review. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14010153 ↗
74. Intelligent monitoring and quantitative evaluation of fire risk in subway construction: Integration of multi- source data fusion, FTA, and deep learning10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143832 ↗
75. A novel gradient descent optimizer based on fractional order scheduler and its application in deep neural networks10.1016/j.apm.2023.12.018 ↗
76. Assessing L2 writing formality using syntactic complexity indices: A fuzzy evaluation approach10.1016/j.asw.2025.100973 ↗
77. Evaluating the cascading impacts of sea level rise and coastal flooding on emergency response spatial accessibility in Lower Manhattan, New York City10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.067 ↗
78. Beyond ‘flood hotspots’: Modelling emergency service accessibility during flooding in York, UK10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.013 ↗
79. City-scale accessibility of emergency responders operating during flood events10.5194/nhess-17-1-2017 ↗
80. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H ↗
81. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6 ↗
82. A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.052 ↗
83. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 ↗
84. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x ↗
85. Maxent modelling for habitat suitability of vulnerable tree Dalbergia latifolia in Nepal10.14214/sf.10441 ↗
86. ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x ↗
87. Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: Use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.009 ↗
88. Research on Geographical Environment Unit Division Based on the Method of Natural Breaks (Jenks)10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-4-W3-47-2013 ↗