A Practical Classification Approach for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Hazards Based on Toxicological and Situational Parameters
Source abstract
Abstract
CBRN incidents are characterized by high uncertainty in terms of agent identity, dissemination methods, and situational context. This unpredictability complicates effective and timely response, especially in the initial phase before specialist services arrive, and lays the burden of applying protection and response measures on members of civil society participating in the incident. This paper proposes a structured classification framework for CBRN hazards to address this gap, integrating key characteristics from existing systems such as the GHS (Globally Harmonized System), WHO (World Health Organization) biosafety levels, and radiological exposure guidelines. The system emphasizes properties relevant for first responders and non-specialists, including observable effects, exposure routes, and hazard endpoints such as toxicity, virulence, and radiation dose. The goal is to enable rapid hazard recognition, improve communication, and support situational decision-making in public security scenarios.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Chemical Safety and Risk Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Biohazard Prevention Centre, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Pomorska 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland
Department of Security and Crisis Management, Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, Zygmunta Cieplaka 1c, 41-300 Dabrowa Gornicza, Poland
Military Institute of Armoured and Automotive Technology, Okuniewska 1, 05-070 Sulejówek, Poland
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Bland, S.A. (2013). Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Casualty Management Principles. Conflict and Catastrophe Medicine, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-2927-1_46 ↗
2. Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear disasters: Pitfalls and perils10.4103/0975-7406.68490 ↗
3. The role of standardisation and conformity assessment in ensuring security and building resilience of critical infrastructure to hybrid threats
4. Kaunert, C., Leonard, S., and Yakubov, I. (2018). EU Civil Protection Responding to CBRN Incidents and Attacks, European Parliament.
5. European Commission, Internal Security Fund—Police (2025, September 10). Mall-CBRN—Counteracting CBRN Threats in Shopping Malls. Available online: https://www.mall-cbrn.uni.lodz.pl/.
6. European Commission, Internal Security Fund—Police (2025, September 17). Safe Stadium—CBRN Security of Mass Events. Available online: https://safe-stadium.eu/.
7. European Commission, Internal Security Fund—Police (2025, September 17). MELODY—A Harmonized CBRN Training Curriculum for First Responders and Medical Staff. Available online: https://melody.sckcen.be/en.
8. European Commission, Horizon 2020 (2025, September 17). NEST—New Scenarios to Protect Cultural Heritage in Case of CBRN Threats, Available online: https://nest-h2020.eu/.
9. Persson, L., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Lai, A., Persson, Å., and Fick, S. (2017). The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals—Explaining the Legal Implementation Gap. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9122176 ↗
10. Biosafety Management Based Upon Risk Assessment and Monitoring: Perspectives from a Clinical Laboratory, China10.2147/RMHP.S476005 ↗
11. Overall view of chemical and biochemical weapons10.3390/toxins6061761 ↗
12. National Research Council (NRC) (2014). Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, Committee on the Development of Science-based Approaches for Identifying GHS Hazards. Appendix D, Overview of the GHS Classification Scheme in Hazard Classification, A Framework to Guide Selection of Chemical Alternatives.
13. The development of the globally harmonized system (GHS) of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.05.035 ↗
14. Chemical warfare agents10.1016/j.etap.2008.03.003 ↗
15. Chemical warfare agents10.4103/0975-7406.68498 ↗
16. Lorke, D.E., and Oz, M. (2025). A review on oxidative stress in organophosphate-induced neurotoxicity. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 180.10.1016/j.biocel.2025.106735 ↗
17. Aroniadou-Anderjaska, V., Figueiredo, T.H., de Araujo Furtado, M., Pidoplichko, V.I., and Braga, M.F.M. (2023). Mechanisms of Organophosphate Toxicity and the Role of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition. Toxics, 11.10.3390/toxics11100866 ↗
18. Maurer, L.L., Alexander, M.S., Bachman, A.N., Grimm, F.A., Lewis, R.J., North, C.M., Wojcik, N.C., and Goyak, K.O. (2022). An interdisciplinary framework for derivation of occupational exposure limits. Front. Public Health, 10.10.3389/fpubh.2022.1038305 ↗
19. Publications Office of the European Union (2025, September 22). Methodology for Derivation of Occupational Exposure Limits of Chemical Agents, Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3c8ef3e0-48fc-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1.
20. Principles of dose-setting in toxicology studies: The importance of kinetics for ensuring human safety10.1007/s00204-021-03155-4 ↗
21. An update of skin permeability data based on a systematic review of recent research10.1038/s41597-024-03026-4 ↗
22. European Parliament and Council (2025, September 22). Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures, Amending and Repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and Amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32008R1272.
23. Development of and prospects for the biological weapons convention10.1016/j.jobb.2021.11.003 ↗
24. Biosafety: Guidelines for working with pathogenic and infectious microorganisms10.1002/9780471729259.mc01a01s13 ↗
25. BSP (2020). Laboratory Biosafety Manual.
26. Epidemiology of Pathogens Listed as Potential Bioterrorism Agents, the Netherlands, 2009–201910.3201/eid2907.221769 ↗
27. National Research Council, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Commission on Life Sciences, Division of Military Science and Technology, and Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (2000). Thresholds of Health Effects for Chemical and Biological Agents, Strategies to Protect the Health of Deployed U.S. Forces: Detecting, Characterizing, and Documenting Exposures.
28. Genetically Engineered Microorganisms and Their Impact on Human Health
29. Cherrie, J., Semple, S., and Coggins, M. (2021). Exposure, Exposure Routes and Exposure Pathways, Wiley.
30. Perceived risks from radiation and nuclear testing near Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan: A comparison between physicians, scientists, and the public10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00882.x ↗
31. Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear major incidents
32. Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear considerations in a major incident
33. The Hidden Complexity of Biological “Dirty Bombs”: Implications for Special Operations Medical Personnel10.55460/ZBFP-Q8MZ ↗
34. Effects of ionizing radiation on biological molecules--mechanisms of damage and emerging methods of detection10.1089/ars.2013.5489 ↗
35. Delfino, I., Falco, M.D., Lepore, M., and Portaccio, M. (2025). Effects Induced in Human Cells and Tissues by Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation: A Review of Vibrational Spectroscopy Contributions. Radiation, 5.10.3390/radiation5020010 ↗
36. Pan American Health Organization (2014). Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards.
37. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2007). The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publ. 103, 37, 2–4.
38. A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose-Response Assessment of Human Health Effects10.1289/ehp.1409385 ↗
39. United States, Environmental Protection Agency, and Health and Environmental Impacts Division (2011). National-Scale Assessment of Mercury Risk to Populations with High Consumption of Self-Caught Freshwater Fish in Support of the Appropriate and Necessary Finding for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Generating Units.
40. Multiple radiations and its effect on biological system—A review on in vitro and in vivo mechanisms10.1080/07853890.2025.2486595 ↗
41. Strengthening radiation protection education and training of health professionals: Conclusions from an IAEA meeting10.1088/1361-6498/ac40e9 ↗
42. New opportunities and current challenges using animal models for the discovery of novel countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome10.1080/17460441.2025.2528966 ↗
43. Characterization of Two Stable Biodosimeters for Absorbed Ionizing Radiation Dose Estimation in Multiple Combined Injury Models10.1667/RADE-24-00261.1 ↗
44. Salem, P.P., Chami, P., Daou, R., Hajj, J., Lin, H., Chhabra, A.M., Simone, C.B., Lee, N.Y., and Hajj, C. (2024). Proton Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review of Treatment-Related Side Effects and Toxicities. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25.10.3390/ijms252010969 ↗
45. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection
46. Introduction: The evolving threat of hybrid war10.1080/00963402.2017.1362905 ↗
47. Bioterrorism potential of haemorrhagic fever viruses—Occupational and environmental Implications of filoviruses and arenaviruses10.26444/aaem/201958 ↗
48. Aerosol pulmonary immune engineering10.1016/j.addr.2023.114831 ↗
49. Inhaled aerosols: Their role in COVID-19 transmission, including biophysical interactions in the lungs10.1016/j.cocis.2021.101451 ↗
50. Real-time characterization of chemical threat agent aerosols for improvement of inhalation studies10.1080/08958378.2023.2254323 ↗
51. Physicochemical and biopharmaceutical aspects influencing skin permeation and role of SLN and NLC for skin drug delivery10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08938 ↗
52. Vesicants and nerve agents in chemical warfare. Decontamination and treatment strategies for a changed world10.3810/pgm.2002.10.1334 ↗
53. Evaluating parameters affecting drug fate at the intramuscular injection site10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.06.023 ↗
54. Acute inhalation injury10.5152/eajm.2010.09 ↗
55. Ladeira, C. (2024). Environmental and Occupational Exposure to Chemical Agents and Health Challenges I-What Message Can Bring to Regulatory Science?. Toxics, 12.10.3390/toxics12110778 ↗
56. Expert-based assessment of chemical and physical exposures, and organizational factors, in past agricultural jobs10.1016/j.envres.2024.120238 ↗
57. Ultrafine particles deposition in human respiratory tract: Experimental measurement and modeling10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118123 ↗
58. Revisiting Airflow and Aerosol Transport Phenomena in the Deep Lungs with Microfluidics10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00621 ↗
59. Balali-Mood, M., Naseri, K., Tahergorabi, Z., Khazdair, M.R., and Sadeghi, M. (2021). Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Front. Pharmacol., 12.10.3389/fphar.2021.643972 ↗
60. Delayed Complications and Long-term Management of Sulfur Mustard Poisoning: Recent Advances by Iranian Researchers (Part I of II)
61. Novichok agents: A historical, current, and toxicological perspective10.1080/24734306.2018.1475151 ↗
62. Todd, E.C.D. (2014). Foodborne Diseases: Overview of Biological Hazards and Foodborne Diseases. Encyclopedia of Food Safety, Elsevier Inc.10.1016/B978-0-12-378612-8.00071-8 ↗
63. Case definitions for chemical poisoning
64. Impact of climate change on the domestic indoor environment and associated health risks in the UK10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.010 ↗
65. Hazard Communication Standard Update10.1177/21650799221119159 ↗
66. Implementing the Hazard Communication Standard final rule: Lessons learned10.1016/j.jchas.2014.10.002 ↗
67. Dangerous good transportation by road: From risk analysis to emergency planning10.1016/j.jlp.2005.06.031 ↗
68. Laboratory Technicians’ Use and Interpretation of Hazard Communication Elements on Chemical Labels10.1021/acs.chas.0c00125 ↗
69. Miejski Kurier (2025, September 17). Czterdzieści Lat Temu na Kopalni Sosnowiec. Available online: https://kuriermiejski.com.pl/czterdziesci-lat-temu-na-kopalni-sosnowiec/.
70. Encysol (2025, September 22). Wypadki w KWK Sosnowiec. Available online: https://encysol.pl/es/encyklopedia/hasla-rzeczowe/14798%2CWypadki-w-KWK-Sosnowiec.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com.