Analysis of Injury Severity in Elderly Pedestrian Traffic Accidents Based on XGBoost
Source abstract
Abstract
With declining physical functions, elderly pedestrians face a significantly higher risk of severe injuries and fatalities in traffic accidents. This study investigates the factors influencing injury severity among elderly pedestrians using traffic accident reports collected by the Shaanxi Chang’an University Traffic Accident Evidence Identification Center, covering nationwide cases from 2023 to 2024. By analyzing 2351 accident reports involving pedestrians aged 60 and above, 31 feature variables closely related to accident severity were selected to build a predictive model based on the XGBoost algorithm. Additionally, the SHAP method was employed to perform feature attribution analysis on the model’s key variables. The experimental results show that: (1) the model achieved 86% accuracy, 83% precision, 87% recall, and an F1 score of 85%, demonstrating the reliability of XGBoost in predicting injury severity among elderly pedestrians. (2) Global analysis identified collision speed, injury location, and driver awareness as the main factors influencing injury severity. However, the key factors differ across accidents of different severity levels. (3) The effect of the same factor also varies by severity level. For example, driver awareness reduces the likelihood of minor injuries but has less impact on severe injuries or fatalities. This study provides a theoretical foundation for developing traffic safety policies targeting elderly pedestrians and contributes to effectively reducing the severity of injuries in elderly pedestrian traffic accidents.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Older Adults Driving Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Transportation Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Department of Mechanical and Traffic Engineering, Ordos Institute of Technology, Ordos 017000, China
Funding
Key Research and Development Program in Shaanxi Province · Ordos City Key Research and Development Program
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Epidemiology of road traffic injuries among elderly people; a systematic review and meta-analysis10.29252/beat-060403 ↗
2. Road traffic accidents involving elderly people: An integrative review10.1590/1981-22562019022.190053 ↗
3. World Health Organization (2025). World Health Statistics 2025: Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals, World Health Organization.
4. Fang, T., Xu, F., and Zou, Z. (2025). Causal Factors in Elderly Pedestrian Traffic Injuries Based on Association Analysis. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15031170 ↗
5. Evaluation of road safety policies performance across Europe: Results from benchmark analysis for a decade10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.026 ↗
6. Levi, S., De Leonardis, D., Antin, J., and Angel, L. (2013). Identifying Countermeasure Strategies to Increase Safety of Older Pedestrians.
7. Prevalence and Characteristics of Traffic Accidents Endangering Vulnerable Pedestrians in Hungary
8. Hilbe, J.M. (2011). Negative Binomial Regression, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511973420 ↗
9. On the bivariate negative binomial regression model10.1080/02664760902984618 ↗
10. The negative binomial regression
11. The mixed logit model: The state of practice10.1023/A:1022558715350 ↗
12. Demaris, A. (1992). Logit modeling: Practical Applications, Sage.10.4135/9781412984836 ↗
13. Specification tests for the multinomial logit model
14. Negative binomial regression model for road crash severity prediction10.5539/mas.v12n4p38 ↗
15. Diagnostic analysis of the logistic model for pedestrian injury severity in traffic crashes10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.017 ↗
16. Values and limitations of statistical models
17. Individual-specific posterior distributions from Mixed Logit models: Properties, limitations and diagnostic checks10.1016/j.jocm.2020.100224 ↗
18. A review on some alternative specifications of the logit model
19. The limitations of log-linear analysis10.2307/2065994 ↗
20. Evaluating the effectiveness of machine learning techniques in forecasting the severity of traffic accidents10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18812 ↗
21. AlMamlook, R.E., Kwayu, K.M., Alkasisbeh, M.R., and Frefer, A.A. (2019, January 9–11). Comparison of machine learning algorithms for predicting traffic accident severity. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Jordan International Joint Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (JEEIT), Amman, Jordan.10.1109/JEEIT.2019.8717393 ↗
22. Infante, P., Jacinto, G., Afonso, A., Rego, L., Nogueira, V., Quaresma, P., Saias, J., Santos, D., Nogueira, P., and Silva, M. (2022). Comparison of statistical and machine-learning models on road traffic accident severity classification. Computers, 11.10.3390/computers11050080 ↗
23. Yan, M., and Shen, Y. (2022). Traffic accident severity prediction based on random forest. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14031729 ↗
24. Wang, J., Ma, S., Jiao, P., Ji, L., Sun, X., and Lu, H. (2023). Analyzing the risk factors of traffic accident severity using a combination of random forest and association rules. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13148559 ↗
25. Prediction of traffic accident severity based on random forest10.1155/2023/7641472 ↗
26. Deep learning model of convolutional neural networks powered by a genetic algorithm for prevention of traffic accidents severity10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113245 ↗
27. A review on neural network techniques for the prediction of road traffic accident severity10.1016/j.eastsj.2021.100040 ↗
28. A deep learning based traffic crash severity prediction framework10.1016/j.aap.2021.106090 ↗
29. Analysis of the severity of accidents on rural roads using statistical and artificial neural network methods10.1155/2023/8089395 ↗
30. Predicting freeway traffic crash severity using XGBoost-Bayesian network model with consideration of features interaction10.1155/2022/4257865 ↗
31. Analysis and visualization of accidents severity based on LightGBM-TPE10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111987 ↗
32. Factors affecting injury severity in motorcycle crashes: Different age groups analysis using Catboost and SHAP techniques10.1080/15389588.2023.2297168 ↗
33. Enhancing occluded pedestrian re-identification with the MotionBlur data augmentation module
34. Guo, M., Yuan, Z., Janson, B., Peng, Y., Yang, Y., and Wang, W. (2021). Older pedestrian traffic crashes severity analysis based on an emerging machine learning XGBoost. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13020926 ↗
35. Analyzing accident injury severity via an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model10.1155/2021/3771640 ↗
36. Analyzing the leading causes of traffic fatalities using XGBoost and grid-based analysis: A city management perspective10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946401 ↗
37. Injury severity prediction of traffic crashes with ensemble machine learning techniques: A comparative study10.1080/17457300.2021.1928233 ↗
38. Analysis of factors affecting the severity of automated vehicle crashes using XGBoost model combining POI data10.1155/2020/8881545 ↗
39. A comprehensive study of macro factors related to traffic fatality rates by XGBoost-based model and GIS techniques10.1016/j.aap.2021.106431 ↗
40. Toward safer highways, application of XGBoost and SHAP for real-time accident detection and feature analysis10.1016/j.aap.2019.105405 ↗
41. XGBoost-SHAP and unobserved heterogeneity modelling of temporal multivehicle truck-involved crash severity patterns10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-06-011 ↗
42. Urban evaluation of pedestrian crossings based on Start-Up Time using the MEREC-MARCOS Model10.56578/judm030103 ↗
43. Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and XGBoost10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101845 ↗
44. Uddin, M., and Ahmed, F. (2018). Pedestrian injury severity analysis in motor vehicle crashes in Ohio. Safety, 4.10.20944/preprints201804.0035.v2 ↗
45. An exploratory analysis of the effects of speed limits on pedestrian injury severities in vehicle-pedestrian crashes10.1016/j.jth.2022.101561 ↗
46. The relationship between impact speed and the probability of pedestrian fatality during a vehicle-pedestrian crash: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.033 ↗
47. Drivers’ reaction time research in the conditions in the real traffic10.1515/eng-2020-0004 ↗
48. Effect of driving speed on reaction time during motorway driving10.1016/0001-4575(94)00084-Y ↗
49. Fisa, R., Musukuma, M., Sampa, M., Musonda, P., and Young, T. (2022). Effects of interventions for preventing road traffic crashes: An overview of systematic reviews. BMC Public Health, 22.10.1186/s12889-021-12253-y ↗
50. Febres, J.D., Mariscal, M.Á., Herrera, S., and García-Herrero, S. (2021). Pedestrians’ injury severity in traffic accidents in Spain: A pedestrian actions approach. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13116439 ↗
51. Effect of A-Pillar Blind Spots on a Driver’s Pedestrian Visibility during Vehicle Turns at an Intersection10.4271/2024-22-0002 ↗
52. Analyzing fault and severity in pedestrian–motor vehicle accidents in China10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.018 ↗
53. Analyzing pedestrian crash injury severity at signalized and non-signalized locations10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.025 ↗
54. Why are older adults more at risk as pedestrians? A systematic review10.1177/0018720821989511 ↗
55. A novel driver hazard perception sensitivity model based on drivers’ characteristics: A simulator study10.1080/15389588.2019.1607971 ↗