An Efficient Uncertainty Quantification Approach for Robust Design of Tuned Mass Dampers in Linear Structural Dynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
The application of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) to high-rise buildings or slender bridges can significantly decrease the dynamical vibrations due to external excitation, such as wind or earthquake loads. However, the individual properties of a TMD such as mass, stiffness and damping have to be designed carefully with respect to the dynamical properties of the investigated structure. In real-world structures, the influence of uncertain system properties might be critical for the performance of a TMD and thus the whole structure. Therefore, the design under uncertainty of such systems is an important issue, which is addressed in the current paper. For our investigations, we consider linear single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems, where analytical formulas for the deterministic design already exist, and linear multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) systems, where a time integration and numerical optimization algorithms are usually applied to obtain the optimal TMD parameters. If the numerical optimization should be coupled with a sampling-based uncertainty quantification method, such as Monte Carlo sampling, the design procedure would require the evaluation of a coupled double-loop approach, which is very demanding from the computation point of view. Therefore, we focus the following paper on an efficient analytical uncertainty quantification approach, which estimates the mean and scatter from a Taylor series expansion. Additionally, we introduce an efficient mode decomposition approach for MDOF systems with multiple TMDs, which estimates the maximum displacements using a modal analysis instead of a demanding time integration. Different optimal design problems are formulated as single- or multi-objective optimization tasks, where the statistical properties of the maximum displacements are considered as safety margins in the optimization goal functions. The application of numerical optimization algorithms is straightforward and not limited to specific algorithms. As numerical examples, we investigate an SDOF system with single TMD and a multi-story frame with multiple TMDs. The presented procedure might be interesting for the design process of structures, where the dynamical vibrations reach a critical threshold.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Structural Mechanics, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany
Structural Analysis and Structural Dynamics, University Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. The theory of the dynamic vibration absorber
2. Tuned mass dampers10.1007/s11831-013-9091-7 ↗
3. Control of wind-induced tall building vibration by tuned mass dampers10.1016/0167-6105(92)90518-F ↗
4. Performance of tuned mass dampers under wind loads10.1016/0141-0296(95)00035-6 ↗
5. Clark, A. (1988, January 2–9). Multiple passive tuned mass dampers for reducing earthquake induced building motion. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
6. A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199706)26:6<617::AID-EQE664>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
7. Petersen, C., and Werkle, H. (2017). Dynamik der Baukonstruktionen, Springer Viehweg. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-8348-2109-6 ↗
8. Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters10.1002/eqe.4290100304 ↗
9. The optimal design of dynamic absorber in the time domain and the frequency domain10.1016/0003-682X(89)90032-7 ↗
10. Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00078-3 ↗
11. Different mechanical models for the study of ultrasonic wave dispersion for mechanical characterization of construction materials10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113352 ↗
12. Optimal design theories and applications of tuned mass dampers10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.023 ↗
13. Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1272) ↗
14. Design of multiple tuned mass dampers by using a numerical optimizer10.1002/eqe.413 ↗
15. Optimization of the individual stiffness and damping parameters in multiple-tuned-mass-damper systems10.1115/1.1855929 ↗
16. Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.017 ↗
17. Optimum placement and properties of tuned mass dampers using hybrid genetic algorithms
18. Seismic control of tall buildings using distributed multiple tuned mass dampers10.1155/2019/6480384 ↗
19. Estimation of optimum tuned mass damper parameters via machine learning10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100847 ↗
20. Machine learning-based model for prediction of optimum TMD parameters in time-domain history10.1007/s40430-024-04747-8 ↗
21. Hu, W. (2023). Design Optimization Under Uncertainty, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-49208-2 ↗
22. Effects of structural uncertainties on TMD design: A reliability-based approach10.1002/stc.4300040108 ↗
23. Efficiency of tuned mass dampers with uncertain parameters on the performance of structures under stochastic excitation
24. Design of an optimal tuned mass damper for a system with parametric uncertainty10.1007/s10479-010-0726-x ↗
25. Robust optimization of MTMD systems for the control of vibrations10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103347 ↗
26. An efficient reliability-based design of TMD & MTMD in nonlinear structures under uncertainty10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.053 ↗
27. Robust design of tuned mass damper with hybrid uncertainty10.1002/stc.2803 ↗
28. Robust design optimization of the friction pendulum system isolated building considering system parameter uncertainties under seismic excitations10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108320 ↗
29. Improvements to and limitations of Latin hypercube sampling10.1016/S0266-8920(97)00013-1 ↗
30. The MathWorks Inc (2024). MATLAB, The MathWorks Inc.. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com.
31. A constrained, globalized, and bounded Nelder–Mead method for engineering optimization10.1007/s00158-003-0320-9 ↗
32. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
33. Ansys Germany GmbH (2025). Ansys optiSLang, Ansys Germany GmbH. Available online: https://www.ansys.com/de-de/products/connect/ansys-optislang.
34. Eibl, J., and Häussler-Combe, U. (1997). Baudynamik. Betonkalender 1997, Ernst & Sohn.
35. Haftka, R., and Gürdal, Z. (1992). Elements of Structural Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-2550-5 ↗
36. Détermination des distributions de probabilités dont les marges sont données
37. Bucher, C. (2009). Computational Analysis of Randomness in Structural Mechanics, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9780203876534 ↗
38. Rubinstein, R.Y. (1981). Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470316511 ↗
39. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., and Tarantola, S. (2008). Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9780470725184 ↗
40. Design for six sigma through robust optimization10.1007/s00158-003-0337-0 ↗
41. Most, T., and Will, J. (2012, January 13–15). Robust Design Optimization in industrial virtual product development. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Reliable Engineering Computing (REC), Brno, Czech Republic.
42. (2021). Eurocode—Basis of Structural Design, Regulation 305/2011 (Standard No. EN 1990:2021-10).
43. Chopra, A. (2017). Dynamics of Structures, Pearson Education, Inc.. [5th ed.].
44. Khadka, A. (2025). Optimization of Tuned Mass Dampers in Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems. [Master’s Thesis, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar].