A Hybrid Approach to Literature-Based Discovery: Combining Traditional Methods with LLMs
Source abstract
Abstract
We present a novel hybrid approach to literature-based discovery (LBD) which exploits large language models (LLMs) to enhance traditional LBD methodologies. We explore the use of LLMs to address significant LBD challenges: (1) the extraction of factual subject–predicate–object relations from publication abstracts using few-shot learning and (2) the filtering of unpromising candidate hidden knowledge pairs (CHKPs) using a variant of the LLM-as-a-judge paradigm with and without the addition of domain-specific information using retrieval augmented generation. The approach produces relations with greater coverage and results in a lower number of CHKPs compared to LBD based on relations extracted with, e.g., SemRep, improving the prediction and efficiency of knowledge discovery. We demonstrate the utility of the method using a drug-repurposing case study and suggest that emerging AI technologies can be used to assist in knowledge discovery from the ever-growing volume of the scientific literature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Topic Modeling · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Information School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2AH, UK
References (92)
Show source-provided references
1. Hahn-Powell, G. (2018). Machine Reading for Scientific Discovery. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Arizona].
2. Literature-related discovery and innovation: Chronic kidney disease10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.013 ↗
3. Zhang, R., Hristovski, D., Schutte, D., Kastrin, A., Fiszman, M., and Kilicoglu, H. (2021). Drug repurposing for COVID-19 via knowledge graph completion. J. Biomed. Inform., 115.10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103696 ↗
4. An interactive system for finding complementary literatures: A stimulus to scientific discovery10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00008-8 ↗
5. Literature Based Discovery: Models, methods, and trends10.1016/j.jbi.2017.08.011 ↗
6. Fish oil, Raynaud’s syndrome, and undiscovered public knowledge10.1353/pbm.1986.0087 ↗
7. Exploring Relation Types for Literature-based Discovery10.1093/jamia/ocv002 ↗
8. Discovering discovery patterns with predication-based Semantic Indexing10.1016/j.jbi.2012.07.003 ↗
9. Pratt, W., and Yetisgen-Yildiz, M. (2003, January 23–25). LitLinker: Capturing connections across the biomedical literature. Proceedings of the K-CAP03: International Conference on Knowledge Capture 2003, Sanibel Island, FL, USA.10.1145/945649.945662 ↗
10. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): Integrating biomedical terminology10.1093/nar/gkh061 ↗
11. Text mining: Generating hypotheses from MEDLINE10.1002/asi.10389 ↗
12. Using concepts in literature-based discovery: Simulating Swanson’s Reynaud—fish oil and Migraine—magnesium discoveries10.1002/asi.1104 ↗
13. Graph-Based Methods for Discovery Browsing with Semantic Predications
14. LION LBD: A literature-based discovery system for cancer biology10.1093/bioinformatics/bty845 ↗
15. Škrlj, B., Kokalj, E., and Lavrač, N. (2021). PubMed-Scale Chemical Concept Embeddings Reconstruct Physical Protein Interaction Networks. Front. Res. Metrics Anal., 6.10.3389/frma.2021.644614 ↗
16. Exploiting semantic relations for literature-based discovery
17. Ranking Indirect Connnections in Literature-Based Discovery: The Role of Medical Subject Headings10.1002/asi.20438 ↗
18. Wren, J.D. (2004). Extending the mutual information measure to rank inferred literature relationships. BMC Bioinform, 5.10.1186/1471-2105-5-145 ↗
19. Context-Driven Automatic Subgraph Creation for Literature-Based Discovery10.1016/j.jbi.2015.01.014 ↗
20. Abduction in semantic space: Towards a logic of discovery10.1093/jigpal/12.2.97 ↗
21. Using literature-based discovery to identify disease candidate genes10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.04.024 ↗
22. Biomedical Language Processing: Perspective What’s Beyond PubMed?10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.012 ↗
23. Large language models to process, analyze, and synthesize biomedical texts: A scoping review10.1007/s44163-024-00197-2 ↗
24. A survey of the recent trends in deep learning for literature based discovery in the biomedical domain10.1016/j.neucom.2023.127079 ↗
25. Avoiding Background Knowledge: Literature Based Discovery From Important Information10.1186/s12859-022-04892-8 ↗
26. SemMedDB: A PubMed-scale repository of biomedical semantic predications10.1093/bioinformatics/bts591 ↗
27. A global network of biomedical relationships derived from text10.1093/bioinformatics/bty114 ↗
28. A Literature-Based Knowledge Graph Embedding Method for Identifying Drug Repurposing Opportunities in Rare Diseases
29. Sil, A., and Lin, X.V. (2021). COVID-19 Literature Knowledge Graph Construction and Drug Repurposing Report Generation. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Demonstrations, Association for Computational Linguistics.
30. Taleb, I., Navaz, A.N., and Serhani, M.A. (2024). Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhancing Literature-Based Discovery. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 8.10.3390/bdcc8110146 ↗
31. Identifying plausible adverse drug reactions using knowledge extracted from the literature10.1016/j.jbi.2014.07.011 ↗
32. Exploiting literature-derived knowledge and semantics to identify potential prostate cancer drugs
33. Sosa, D.N., and Altman, R.B. (2022). Contexts and contradictions: A roadmap for computational drug repurposing with knowledge inference. Briefings Bioinform., 23.10.1093/bib/bbac268 ↗
34. Drug repurposing programmes get lift off10.1038/nrd3776 ↗
35. FullMeSH: Improving large-scale MeSH indexing with full text10.1093/bioinformatics/btz756 ↗
36. Using UMLS Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs) for word sense disambiguation in the biomedical domain
37. Using statistical and knowledge-based approaches for literature-based discovery10.1016/j.jbi.2005.11.010 ↗
38. An overview of MetaMap: Historical perspective and recent advances10.1136/jamia.2009.002733 ↗
39. Literature-based discovery of new candidates for drug repurposing
40. Gopalakrishnan, V., Jha, K., Jin, W., and Zhang, A. (2019). A survey on literature based discovery approaches in biomedical domain. J. Biomed. Inform., 93.10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103141 ↗
41. Zhao, D., Wang, J., Sang, S., Lin, H., Wen, J., and Yang, C. (2019). Relation path feature embedding based convolutional neural network method for drug discovery. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 19.10.1186/s12911-019-0764-5 ↗
42. Supporting discovery in medicine by association rule mining in Medline and UMLS
43. Kilicoglu, H., Rosemblat, G., Fiszman, M., and Rindflesch, T.C. (2011). Constructing a semantic predication gold standard from the biomedical literature. BMC Bioinform., 12.10.1186/1471-2105-12-486 ↗
44. Kilicoglu, H., Rosemblat, G., Fiszman, M., and Shin, D. (2020). Broad-coverage biomedical relation extraction with SemRep. BMC Bioinform., 21.10.1186/s12859-020-3517-7 ↗
45. Ming, S., Zhang, R., and Kilicoglu, H. (2024). Enhancing the coverage of SemRep using a relation classification approach. J. Biomed. Inform., 155.10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104658 ↗
46. Domain-Specific Language Model Pretraining for Biomedical Natural Language Processing
47. PKDE4J: Entity and relation extraction for public knowledge discovery10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.008 ↗
48. Hong, G., Kim, Y., Choi, Y., and Song, M. (2021). BioPREP: Deep learning-based predicate classification with SemMedDB. J. Biomed. Inform., 122.10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103888 ↗
49. Lai, P.T., Wei, C.H., Luo, L., Chen, Q., and Lu, Z. (2023). BioREx: Improving biomedical relation extraction by leveraging heterogeneous datasets. J. Biomed. Inform., 146.10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104487 ↗
50. Relation Classification for Bleeding Events From Electronic Health Records Using Deep Learning Systems: An Empirical Study10.2196/27527 ↗
51. Moens, M.F., Huang, X., Specia, L., and Yih, S.W.T. (2021). REBEL: Relation Extraction By End-to-end Language generation. Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, Association for Computational Linguistics.
52. Goldberg, Y., Kozareva, Z., and Zhang, Y. (2022). Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractors. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics.
53. Bahaj, A., and Ghogho, M. (2025). A step towards quantifying, modelling and exploring uncertainty in biomedical knowledge graphs. Comput. Biol. Med., 184.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109355 ↗
54. Kilicoglu, H., Rosemblat, G., and Rindflesch, T.C. (2017). Assigning factuality values to semantic relations extracted from biomedical research literature. PLoS ONE, 7.10.1371/journal.pone.0179926 ↗
55. Using Literature-based Discovery to Identify Novel Therapeutic Approaches10.2174/1871525711311010005 ↗
56. Hoffmann, A., and Motoda, S.T.H. (2005). The Arrowsmith Project: 2005 Status Report. Discovery Science, Springer.10.1007/11563983 ↗
57. Discovering and visualizing indirect associations between biomedical concepts10.1093/bioinformatics/btr214 ↗
58. Hu, X., Li, G., Yoo, I., Zhang, X., and Xu, X. (2005, January 25–27). A semantic-based approach for mining undiscovered public knowledge from biomedical literature. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, Beijing, China.
59. Syafiandini, A.F., Song, G., Ahn, Y., Kim, H., and Song, M. (2022). An automatic hypothesis generation for plausible linkage between xanthium and diabetes. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-20752-0 ↗
60. Sybrandt, J., Tyagin, I., Shtutman, M., and Safro, I. (2020, January 19–23). AGATHA: Automatic Graph Mining And Transformer based Hypothesis Generation Approach. Proceedings of the CIKM ’20: 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3340531.3412684 ↗
61. Crichton, G., Baker, S., Guo, Y., and Korhonen, A. (2020). Neural networks for open and closed Literature-based Discovery. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0232891 ↗
62. Target identification among known drugs by deep learning from heterogeneous networks10.1039/C9SC04336E ↗
63. Science in the age of large language models10.1038/s42254-023-00581-4 ↗
64. Applications of large language models in cancer care: Current evidence and future perspectives10.3389/fonc.2023.1268915 ↗
65. Wang, Q., Downey, D., Ji, H., and Hope, T. (2024). SciMON: Scientific Inspiration Machines Optimized for Novelty. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.18 ↗
66. Nedbaylo, A., and Hristovski, D. (2024, January 20–24). Implementing Literature-based Discovery (LBD) with ChatGPT. Proceedings of the 2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia.10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569439 ↗
67. Peng, Y., Bonifield, G., and Smalheiser, N.R. (2017). Gaps within the biomedical literature: Initial characterization and assessment of strategies for discovery. Front. Res. Metrics Anal., 2.10.3389/frma.2017.00003 ↗
68. Bolding, Q., Liao, B., Denis, B.J., Luo, J., and Monz, C. (2023, January 6–10). Ask Language Model to Clean Your Noisy Translation Data. Proceedings of the Findings of EMNLP, Singapore.10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.212 ↗
69. Zheng, L., Chiang, W.L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., and Xing, E.P. (2023, January 10–16). Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-bench and Chatbot Arena. Proceedings of the NIPS’23: 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Red Hook, NY, USA.
70. Evaluation of literature-based discovery systems. Literature-Based Discovery10.1007/978-3-540-68690-3_7 ↗
71. A systematic review on literature-based discovery workflow10.7717/peerj-cs.235 ↗
72. A new evaluation methodology for literature-based discovery10.1016/j.jbi.2008.12.001 ↗
73. Moreau, E. (2023). Literature-based discovery: Addressing the issue of the subpar evaluation methodology. Bioinformatics, 39.10.1093/bioinformatics/btad090 ↗
74. Ganiz, M.C., Pottenger, W.M., and Janneck, C.D. (2005). Recent Advances in Literature Based Discovery, Lehigh University. Technical Report LU-CSE-05-027.
75. Lo, K., Wang, L.L., Neumann, M., Kinney, R., and Weld, D. (2020, January 5–10). S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online.10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.447 ↗
76. GROBID (2024, August 04). 2008–2021. Available online: https://github.com/kermitt2/grobid.
77. Halvani, O. (2024, August 04). Constituent Treelib—A Lightweight Python Library for Constructing, Processing, and Visualizing Constituent Trees v0.0.8. Available online: https://pypi.org/project/constituent-treelib/.
78. Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., and Azhar, F. (2023). LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models. arXiv.
79. Segura-Bedmar, I., Martínez, P., and Herrero-Zazo, M. (2013, January 14–15). SemEval-2013 Task 9: Extraction of Drug-Drug Interactions from Biomedical Texts (DDIExtraction 2013). Proceedings of the Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), Volume 2: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2013), Atlanta, GA, USA.
80. Reimers, N., and Gurevych, I. (2019, January 3–7). Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1410 ↗
81. Lin, C.Y. (2004, January 25–26). ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries. Proceedings of the Text Summarization Branches Out, Barcelona, Spain.
82. A survey of text summarization: Techniques, evaluation and challenges10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100070 ↗
83. Migraine and magnesium—11 neglected connections10.1353/pbm.1988.0009 ↗
84. Indomethacin and Alzheimer’s disease10.1212/WNL.46.2.583 ↗
85. Generating hypotheses by discovering implicit associations in the literature: A case report of a search for new potential therapeutic uses for thalidomide10.1197/jamia.M1158 ↗
86. Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., and Funtowicz, M. (2020). HuggingFace’s Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 ↗
87. BioBERT: A pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682 ↗
88. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks
89. Predicting highly cited papers: A Method for Early Detection of Candidate Breakthroughs10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.017 ↗
90. Xu, R., Li, L., and Wang, Q. (2014). dRiskKB: A large-scale disease-disease risk relationship knowledge base constructed from biomedical text. BMC Bioinform., 15.10.1186/1471-2105-15-105 ↗
91. Hosking, T., Blunsom, P., and Bartolo, M. (2024, January 6–9). Human Feedback is not Gold Standard. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, New Orleans, LA, USA.
92. Hui, W., and Lau, W.K. (2019, January 18–20). Application of Literature-Based Discovery in Nonmedical Disciplines: A Survey. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing and Big Data, New York, NY, USA, Taichung, Taiwan.10.1145/3366650.3366660 ↗