Fine-Tuning BiomedBERT with LoRA and Pseudo-Labeling for Accurate Drug–Drug Interactions Classification
Source abstract
Abstract
In clinical decision support systems (CDSSs), where accurate classification of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) can directly affect treatment safety and outcomes, identifying drug interactions is a major challenge, introducing a scalable approach for classifying DDIs utilizing a finely-tuned biomedical language model. The method shown here uses BiomedBERT, a domain-specific version of bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) that was pre-trained on biomedical literature, to reduce the number of resources needed during fine-tuning. Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) was used to fine-tune the model on the DrugBank dataset. The objective was to classify DDIs into two clinically distinct categories, that is, synergistic and antagonistic interactions. A pseudo-labeling strategy was created to deal with the problem of not having enough labeled data. A curated ground-truth dataset was constructed using polarity-labeled interaction entries from DrugComb and verified DrugBank antagonism pairs. The fine-tuned model is used to figure out what kinds of interactions there are in the rest of the unlabeled data. A checkpointing system saves predictions and confidence scores in small pieces, which means that the process can be continued and is not affected by system crashes. The framework is designed to log every prediction it makes, allowing results to be refined later, either manually or through automated updates, without discarding low-confidence cases, as traditional threshold-based methods often do. The method keeps a record of every output it generates, making it easier to revisit earlier predictions, either by experts or with improved tools, without depending on preset confidence cutoffs. It was built with efficiency in mind, so it can handle large amounts of biomedical text without heavy computational demands. Rather than focusing on model novelty, this research demonstrates how existing biomedical transformers can be adapted to polarity-aware DDI classification with minimal computational overhead, emphasizing deployment feasibility and clinical relevance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Machine Learning in Healthcare
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Doctoral School of Letters, Humanities and Applied Sciences, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Târgu Mureş, 540142 Târgu Mureş, Romania
Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Târgu Mureş, 540142 Târgu Mureş, Romania
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Masnoon, N., Shakib, S., Kalisch Ellett, L., and Caughey, G. (2017). What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions. BMC Geriatr., 17.10.1186/s12877-017-0621-2 ↗
2. Mouazer, A., Tsopra, R., Sedki, K., Letord, C., and Lamy, J.B. (2022). Decision-support systems for managing polypharmacy in the elderly: A scoping review. J. Biomed. Inform., 130.10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104074 ↗
3. Hu, Z., Liu, W., Zhang, C., Huang, J., Zhang, S., Yu, H., Xiong, Y., Liu, H., Ke, S., and Hong, L. (2023). SAM-DTA: A sequence-agnostic model for drug–target binding affinity prediction. Briefings Bioinform., 24.10.1093/bib/bbac533 ↗
4. Deep learning for drug-drug interaction prediction: A comprehensive review10.1002/qub2.32 ↗
5. Mobilizing clinical decision support to facilitate knowledge translation: A case study in China10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.02.013 ↗
6. Dhami, D.S., Yan, S., Kunapuli, G., Page, D., and Natarajan, S. (2021). Predicting Drug-Drug Interactions from Heterogeneous Data: An Embedding Approach. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-030-77211-6_28 ↗
7. BioBERT: A pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682 ↗
8. Hu, E.J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., and Chen, W. (2021). LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models. arXiv.
9. Drug Interaction Alert Override Rates in the Meaningful Use Era10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0103 ↗
10. A Rule-Based Inference Framework to Explore and Explain the Biological Related Mechanisms of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions10.1155/2022/9093262 ↗
11. Yan, X.Y., Yin, P.W., Wu, X.M., and Han, J.X. (2021). Prediction of the Drug–Drug Interaction Types with the Unified Embedding Features from Drug Similarity Networks. Front. Pharmacol., 12.10.3389/fphar.2021.794205 ↗
12. Liu, M., Srivastava, G., Ramanujam, J., and Brylinski, M. (2024). SynerGNet: A Graph Neural Network Model to Predict Anticancer Drug Synergy. Biomolecules, 14.10.3390/biom14030253 ↗
13. Yuan, Z., Liu, Y., Tan, C., Huang, S., and Huang, F. (2021). Improving Biomedical Pretrained Language Models with Knowledge. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2021.bionlp-1.20 ↗
14. Clinical-GAN: Trajectory Forecasting of Clinical Events using Transformer and Generative Adversarial Networks10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102507 ↗
15. Zhang, S., and System, V.P.H. (2025, April 24). 344-2013: A Macro to Read in Medi-Span Text Format Database by Data Dictionary. SAS Global Forum, Available online: https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings13/344-2013.pdf.
16. Moldovan, L., and Gligor, A. (2024, January 3–4). Molecular Feature-Based Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions Using Graph Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference Interdisciplinarity in Engineering, Targu Mures, Romania.
17. Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000094 ↗
18. Tanvir, F., Saifuddin, K.M., and Akbas, E. (2022). DDI Prediction via Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networks. arXiv.
19. Muraru, M.M., Simó, Z., and Iantovics, L.B. (2024). Cervical Cancer Prediction Based on Imbalanced Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms with a Variety of Sampling Methods. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202409.1118.v1 ↗
20. Liu, D., Xie, S., Li, Y., Zhao, D., and El-Alfy, E.S.M. (2017, January 14–18). Next Generation Hybrid Intelligent Medical Diagnosis Systems. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing, Guangzhou, China.10.1007/978-3-319-70139-4 ↗