journal article·2025-08-06Open access

Influence of Abrasive Flow Rate and Feed Rate on Jet Lag During Abrasive Water Jet Cutting of Beech Plywood

Monika Sarvašová Kvietková, Ondrej Dvořák, Chia-Feng Lin, Dennis Jones, Petr Ptáček, Roman Fojtík

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

Cutting beech plywood using abrasive water jet (AWJ) technology represents a significant area of research due to increasing demands for precision, quality, and environmental sustainability in manufacturing processes within the woodworking industry. AWJ technology enables non-contact cutting of materials without causing thermal deformation or mechanical damage, which is crucial for preserving the structural integrity and mechanical properties of the plywood. This article investigates cutting beech plywood using technical methods using an abrasive water jet (AWJ) at 400 MPa pressure, with Australian garnet (80 MESH) as the abrasive material. It examines how abrasive mass flow rate, traverse speed, and material thickness affect AWJ lag, which in turn influences both cutting quality and accuracy. Measurements were conducted with power abrasive mass flow rates of 250, 350, and 450 g/min and traverse speeds of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 m/min. Results show that increasing the abrasive mass flow rate from 250 g/min to 350 g/min slightly decreased the AWJ cut width by 0.05 mm, while further increasing to 450 g/min caused a slight increase of 0.1 mm. Changes in traverse speed significantly influenced cut width; increasing the traverse speed from 0.2 m/min to 0.4 m/min widened the AWJ by 0.21 mm, while increasing it to 0.6 m/min caused a slight increase of 0.18 mm. For practical applications, it is recommended to use an abrasive mass flow rate of around 350 g/min combined with a traverse speed between 0.2 and 0.4 m/min when cutting beech plywood with AWJ. This balance minimizes jet lag and maintains high surface quality comparable to conventional milling. For thicker plywood, reducing the traverse speed closer to 0.2 m/min and slightly increasing the abrasive flow should ensure clean cuts without compromising surface integrity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Erosion and Abrasive Machining · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Wood Processing and Biomaterials, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 1176, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic

Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Division of Wood Science and Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Forskargatan 1, SE-931 87 Skellefteå, Sweden

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

University Institute UCEEB, Czech Technical University in Prague, Třinecká 1024, 273 43 Bustehrad, Czech Republic

Department of Building Constructions, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Ostrava, Ludvíka Podéště 1875/17, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Beer, P. (2007). Niekonwencjonalne Narzedzia do Obróbki Drewna, Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej Poznaň.
2. Multi-criteria methods in the optimization of the abrasive waterjet cutting process10.1063/5.0203525 ↗
3. A four-decade of abrasive waterjet processing technology (1980–2023): A scientometric analysis
4. Experimental study on the performance and mechanism of high-pressure abrasive waterjet cutting hard rock10.1007/s10706-023-02739-4 ↗
5. Thermal aspects of ice abrasive water jet technology10.1177/1687814015597619 ↗
6. Khan, R., Ahmad, M., Ali, S., and Talib, G.A. (2024). Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Composites: Empirical and Analytical Modelling, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co., KG.
7. Abrasives for water-jet cutting of high-strength and thick hard materials10.1007/s00170-016-9462-y ↗
8. Szatkiewicz, T., Perec, A., Radomska-Zalas, A., Banaszek, K., and Balasz, B. (2023). Preliminary studies into cutting of a novel two component 3D-printed stainless steel–polymer composite material by abrasive water jet. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16031170 ↗
9. Modeling study of metal cutting with abrasive waterjets10.1115/1.3225682 ↗
10. Geskin, E.S., Chen, W.L., Chen, S.S., Hu, F., Khan, M.E.H., and Kim, S. (1989, January 29–31). Investigation of Anatomy of an Abrasive Waterjet. Proceedings of the 5th American Waterjet Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada.
11. Development of an abrasive waterjet kerf cutting model for brittle materials10.1007/978-94-011-2678-6_33 ↗
12. Engemann Bernd, K. (1993). Schneiden mit Laserstrahlung und Wasserstrahl, Ehningen bei Böblinger.
13. Characteristics of Abrasive Waterjet Generated Surfaces and Effects of Cutting parameters and Structure Vibration10.1115/1.2803529 ↗
14. Gee, C. (1996). Modelling of 3D abrasive waterjet machining, part 1—Theoretical basis. Jetting Technology, Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd.
15. Gee, C. (1996). Modelling of 3D abrasive waterjet machining. Part 2—Simulation of machining. Jetting Technology, Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd.
16. Krajný, Z. (2001). Vodný lúč v Praxi—WJM, EPOS Bratislava.
17. A Model for Abrasive-Waterjet (AWJ) Machining10.1115/1.3226448 ↗
18. Investigation of multiple process parameters in abrasive water jet machining of tiles10.1080/02533839.2015.1010944 ↗
19. Waterjet machining and research developments: A review10.1007/s00170-018-3094-3 ↗
20. Emerging technologies for the production of biojet fuels from wood—Can greenhouse gas emission reductions meet policy requirements?10.1007/s13399-022-02916-0 ↗
21. Experimental determination of cutting speed influence on cutting surface character in material laser cutting10.17973/MMSJ.2016_09_201639 ↗
22. Using acoustic sound pressure level for quality prediction of surfaces created by abrasive waterjet10.1007/s00170-009-2277-3 ↗
23. Maňková, I. (2000). Progresívne Technológie, VIENALA.
24. Topographical anomaly on surfaces created by abrasive waterjet10.1007/s00170-011-3511-3 ↗
25. Determination of vibration frequency depending on abrasive mass flow rate during abrasive water jet cutting10.1007/s00170-014-6497-9 ↗
26. Investigation of the Effects of Machining Parameters on Material Removal Rate in Abrasive Waterjet Turning10.1155/2014/624203 ↗
27. Optimalization Factors in Abrasive Waterjet Machining10.1115/1.2899619 ↗
28. Understanding and predicting material removal rate in abrasive waterjet milling of kerfs
29. Modelling and analysis of abrasive water jet cutting front profile10.1007/s00170-021-07014-5 ↗
30. Wang, H., Yuan, R., Zhang, X., Zai, P., and Deng, J. (2023). Research Progress in Abrasive Water Jet Processing Technology. Micromachines, 14.10.3390/mi14081526 ↗
31. Prediction of surface roughness using machine learning approach for abrasive waterjet milling of alumina ceramic10.1007/s00170-021-08052-9 ↗
32. Experimental and simulation study on the influence factors of abrasive water jet machining ductile materials10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.035 ↗
33. Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet (AWJ) cutting process accuracy10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.092 ↗
34. Optimization of abrasive waterjet cutting by using the CODAS method with regard to interdependent processing parameters10.5545/sv-jme.2023.647 ↗
35. Minimization of surface roughness and residual stress in abrasive water jet cutting of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V10.1177/09544089231157972 ↗
36. Yang, T., Zhao, W., Zhu, X., and Wen, Q. (2024). Experimental investigation of the distribution patterns of micro-scratches in abrasive waterjet cutting surface. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-68456-x ↗
37. Zou, X., Fu, L., Wu, L., and Zuo, W. (2023). Research on multiphase flow and nozzle wear in a high-pressure abrasive water jet cutting head. Machines, 11.10.3390/machines11060614 ↗
38. Influence of processing parameters on the surface roughness of solid wood cut by abrasive water jet10.15376/biores.15.3.6135-6148 ↗
39. Stress–strain parameter prediction method for AWJ technology from surface topography10.1007/s00170-023-11601-z ↗
40. Allen, N.G. (1994, January 25–27). On the characterisation of surfaces obtained by abrasive water jet machining. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference Jet Cuttting Technology, Rouen, France.
41. de la Rosa, S., Rodríguez-Parada, L., Ponce, M.B., and Mayuet Ares, P.F. (2024). The Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polylactic Acid Samples Obtained by Additive Manufacturing: A Comparative Analysis. J. Compos. Sci., 8.10.3390/jcs8100437 ↗
42. Study on the process of abrasive water jet cutting for zirconia ceramic tubes10.1007/s00170-023-11472-4 ↗
43. Influence of Selected Diagnostic Parameters on the Quality of AWJ Cutting Surface10.12913/22998624/144642 ↗
44. Perspective study of abrasive water jet machining of composites—A review10.1007/s12206-021-1220-x ↗
45. A comparison of laser cutting and water-jet cutting
46. Rao, D.B., Baskey, D., and Rawat, R. (2025, August 01). Water Jet Cutter: An Efficient Tool for Composite Product Development. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/reader/11874816.
47. Popan, I.A., Cosma, C., Popan, A.I., Bocăneț, V.I., and Bâlc, N. (2024). Monitoring Equipment Malfunctions in Composite Material Machining: Acoustic Emission-Based Approach for Abrasive Waterjet Cutting. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14114901 ↗
48. Advancements in Abrasive Waterjet Cutting Technologies: A Comprehensive Overview and Future Prospects in the Manufacturing Industry10.4028/p-Zr0osO ↗
49. Advanced Waterjet Technology for Machining Curved and Layered Structures10.1515/cls-2019-0004 ↗