Passenger Service Time at the Platform–Train Interface: A Review of Variability, Design Factors, and Crowd Management Implications Based on Laboratory Experiments
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper reviews the variability of passenger service time (PST) at the platform–train interface (PTI), a critical performance indicator in metro systems shaped by the infrastructure design, affecting passenger behavior and accessibility. Despite its operational importance, PST remains underexplored in relation to crowd management strategies. This review synthesizes findings from empirical and experimental research to clarify the main factors influencing PST and their implications for platform-level interventions. Key contributors to PST variability include door width, gap dimensions, crowd density, and user characteristics such as mobility impairments. Design elements—such as platform edge doors, yellow safety lines, and vertical handrails—affect flow efficiency and spatial dynamics during boarding and alighting. Advanced tracking and simulation tools (e.g., PeTrack and YOLO-based systems) are identified as essential for evaluating pedestrian behavior and supporting Level of Service (LOS) analysis. To complement traditional LOS metrics, the paper introduces Level of Interaction (LOI) and a multidimensional LOS framework that captures spatial conflicts and user interaction zones. Control strategies such as platform signage, seating arrangements, and visual cues are also reviewed, with experimental evidence showing that targeted design interventions can reduce PST by up to 35%. The review highlights a persistent gap between academic knowledge and practical implementation. It calls for greater integration of empirical evidence into policy, infrastructure standards, and operational contracts. Ultimately, it advocates for human-centered, data-informed approaches to PTI planning that enhance efficiency, inclusivity, and resilience in high-demand transit environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transportation Planning and Optimization · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Avda. Brasil 2147, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile
Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 7830490, Chile
Funding
Concurso DI Investigación Asociativa Interdisciplinaria 2025 · Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaíso, Chile
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. Crowd management COVID-1910.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.04.006 ↗
2. Transportation Research Board (2000). Highway Capacity Manual 2000, National Academy Press. Special Report 209.
3. Application of Agent Based Simulation for Evaluating a Bus Layout Design from Passengers’ Perspective10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.009 ↗
4. Influence of Platform Height, Door Width, and Fare Collection on Bus Dwell Time: Laboratory Evidence for Santiago de Chile10.3141/2143-08 ↗
5. Train design features affecting boarding and alighting of passengers10.1002/atr.1446 ↗
6. Puong, A. (2000). Dwell Time Model and Analysis for the MBTA Red Line. [Master’s Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
7. Modeling and Simulation of Passenger Alighting and Boarding Movement in Beijing Metro Stations10.1016/j.trc.2007.12.001 ↗
8. Fernandez, R., Gibson, J., and Mendez, M. (1995, January 17). Modelación Del Comportamiento En Paraderos Formales. Proceedings of the Actas del VII Congreso Chileno de Ingeniería de Transporte, Santiago, Chile.
9. Fernandez, R., del Campo, M.A., and Swett, C. (2008, January 1). Data Collection and Calibration of Passenger Service Time Models for the Transantiago System. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference 2008, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
10. Heinz, W. (2003). Passenger Service Times on Trains-Theory, Measurements and Models. [Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology].
11. Wiggenraad, B.L. (2001). Alighting and Boarding Times of Passengers at Dutch Railway Stations, Trail Research School, Delft University of Technology.
12. Simulating Dynamical Features of Escape Panic10.1038/35035023 ↗
13. Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions10.1287/trsc.1040.0108 ↗
14. Bottlenecks in Granular Flow: When Does an Obstacle Increase the Flow Rate in an Hourglass?10.1103/PhysRevE.85.020301 ↗
15. Designing for Pedestrians: A Level-of-Service Concept
16. Transportation Research Board (2003). Transit Capacity and Level of Service Manual, Transportation Research Board. [2nd ed.].
17. Exploring the Pedestrian Level of Interaction on Platform Conflict Areas10.1080/03081060.2016.1238574 ↗
18. Seriani, S., Aprigliano, V., Garcia, G., Lopez, A., and Fujiyama, T. (2024). The Pedestrian Level of Service in Metro Stations: A Pilot Study Based on Passenger Detection Techniques. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14156515 ↗
19. Boarding and Alighting Experiments: Overview of Setup and Performance and Some Preliminary Results10.3141/2042-08 ↗
20. The Impact of Gap Dimensions on Passengers Boarding and Alighting Using10.1080/23248378.2020.1836685 ↗
21. Fujiyama, T., Thoreau, R., and Tyler, N. (2012). The Effects of the Design Factors of the Train-Platform Interface on Pedestrian Flow Rates. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-02447-9_95 ↗
22. Reduced Dwell Times Resulting from Train–Platform Improvements: The Costs and Benefits of Improving Passenger Accessibility to Metro Trains10.1080/03081060.2012.693267 ↗
23. Seriani, S., Arce, P., Belmar, C., Blanche, V., Valencia, A., Luza, D., and Fujiyama, T. (2023). Analyzing the Effect of Yellow Safety Line Designs at the Platform Edge in Metro Stations: An Experimental Approach. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13084791 ↗
24. Seriani, S., Aprigliano, V., Toro, C., Rojas, G., Gonzalez, F., Peña, A., and Achuthan, K. (2024). Incident Analysis in Micromobility Spaces at Metro Stations: A Case Study in Valparaíso, Chile. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su162310483 ↗
25. Metro Railway Safety: An Analysis of Accident Precursors10.1016/j.ssci.2012.03.004 ↗
26. Division method for waiting areas on island platforms at metro stations10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000484 ↗
27. Station Passenger Barrier Systems and Their Impact on Metro Transport Services
28. Effect of Vertical Step Height on Boarding and Alighting Time of Train Passengers10.1177/0954409715590480 ↗
29. Rudloff, C., Bauer, D., Matyus, T., and Seer, S. (2011, January 5). Mind the Gap: Boarding and Alighting Processes Using the Social Force Paradigm Calibrated on Experimental Data. Proceedings of the 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2011.6083077 ↗
30. Rail Passenger Crowding, Stress, Health and Safety in Britain10.1016/j.tra.2005.07.001 ↗
31. Seriani, S., Aprigliano, V., Gonzalez, S., Baeza, G., Lopez, A., and Fujiyama, T. (2024). The Effect of Seat Layout on the Interaction of Passengers Inside the Train Carriage: An Experimental Approach for Urban Services. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16030998 ↗
32. Transportation Research Board (2013). Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Transportation Research Board. [3rd ed.].
33. Carreno, M., Willis, A., and Stradling, S. (2002, January 23–25). Quality of Service for Pedestrians: Closing the Gaps in Knowledge. Proceedings of the International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies (ICTTS), Beijing, China.10.1061/40630(255)45 ↗
34. Hall, E.T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension, Doubleday. Anchor Books, Repr.
35. Pushkarev, B., and Zupan, J. (1975). Urban Space for Pedestrians, MIT Press.
36. Relationship of Personal Space to Body Image Boundary Definiteness10.1016/0092-6566(76)90062-3 ↗
37. Sommer, R. (1969). Personal Space: The Behavioral Basis of Design, Prentice-Hall.
38. Crowding and Personal Space Invasion on the Train: Please Don’t Make Me Sit in the Middle10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.10.002 ↗
39. Guy, S.J., Chhugani, J., Curtis, S., Dubey, P., Lin, M., and Manocha, D. (2010, January 2–4). Pledestrians: A Least-Effort Approach to Crowd Simulation. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, Madrid, Spain.
40. Seriani, S., Barriga, J.M., Peña, Á., Valencia, A., Aprigliano, V., Jorquera, L., and Fujiyama, T. (2022). Analyzing the Effect of Crowds on Passenger Behavior inside Urban Trains through Laboratory Experiments—A Pilot Study. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142214882 ↗
41. Analyzing the Effect of Bicycle Facilities on Commute Mode Share over Time
42. Integrating Bicycling and Public Transport in North America10.5038/2375-0901.12.3.5 ↗
43. The Bicycle as a Feedering Mode: Experiences from Three European Countries10.1016/j.trd.2004.02.005 ↗
44. Non-Motorised Modes in Transport Systems: A Multimodal Chain Perspective for The Netherlands10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00022-X ↗
45. Determining Bicycle Infrastructure Preferences—A Case Study of Dublin10.1016/j.trd.2012.04.001 ↗
46. Crowding in Public Transport: A Review of Objective and Subjective Measures10.5038/2375-0901.16.2.6 ↗
47. The Influence of Bicycle Traffic on Vehicle Speed in Mixed Traffic Flow
48. Seriani, S., Aprigliano, V., Peña, Á., Rubio, M., Arredondo, B., Bustos, E., Bastías, I., Gonzalez, F., and Fujiyama, T. (2024). The Potential Carrying of Bicycles Inside the Train Carriage: An Experimental Pilot Study Based on Valparaíso Metro, Chile. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su162410870 ↗
49. Weidmann, U. (1993). Transporttechnik Der Fussgaenger, ETH Zurich.
50. Pedestrian Route Choices between Escalator and Stairway in MTR Stations10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:3(277) ↗
51. Berrou, J.L., Beecham, J., Quaglia, P., Kagarlis, M.A., and Gerodimos, A. (2005). Calibration and Validation of the Legion Simulation Model Using Empirical Data. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, Springer.
52. A Review of Pedestrian Flow Characteristics and Level of Service over Different
53. Level of Service Analysis for Metro Station with Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Manual: A Case Study—Shohada Station in Iran10.1007/s40864-018-0098-0 ↗
54. Where and How Often Do People Touch Train Interiors? An Investigation during the Pandemic
55. Exploring an Estimation Approach for the Pedestrian Level of Service for Metro Stations Based on an Interaction Index10.1080/19427867.2019.1629061 ↗
56. Study of the Space Occupied by a Wheelchair User at Metro de Santiago Platforms by Laboratory Experiments10.1155/2021/1789241 ↗
57. The Negotiation of Stationary and Moving Obstructions during Walking: The Effect of Stroke
58. Seriani, S., Fernandes, V.A., Moraga, P., and Cortes, F. (2022). Experimental Location of the Vertical Handrail to Improve the Accessibility of Wheelchair Passengers Boarding and Alighting at Metro Stations—A Pilot Study. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14159224 ↗
59. Collecting Pedestrian Trajectories10.1016/j.neucom.2012.01.036 ↗
60. Passenger Behavior in Constrained Environments
61. Still, G.K. (2000). Crowd Dynamics. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Warwick].
62. Kulczewski, M., Wilson, A., Seriani, S., and Fujiyama, T. (2022). Factorial Design with Simulation for the Optimization of the Level of Service in the Platform-Train Interface of Metro Stations—A Pilot Study. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142315840 ↗
63. Accessible Public Transport: Design Guidance for Inclusivity
64. Pedestrian Flow Modeling by Microscopic Simulation
65. Simulation-Based Evaluation of PTI Design
66. Modeling and Simulation of Pedestrian Traffic Flow10.1016/0191-2615(94)90013-2 ↗
67. Pelechano, N., Allbeck, J.M., and Badler, N.I. (2007, January 4–5). Controlling Individual Agents in High-Density Crowd Simulation. Proceedings of the Eurographics/SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation, San Diego, CA, USA.
68. Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo (2016). Decreto Supremo 50. Ley No 20.422; Sobre Igualdad de Oportunidades e Inclusión Social de Personas con Discapacidad, Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo.
69. MIDEPLAN (2003). Capítulo 2 Características del equipo rodante. Recomendaciones de Diseño para Proyectos de Infraestructura Ferroviaria (REDEFE), SECTRA.
70. Ministerio de Planificación (2011). Decreto Supremo 142. Aprueba Reglamento de la Ley N°20.422; Que Establece Normas sobre Igualdad de Oportunidades e Inclusión Social de Personas con Discapacidad, Relativo al Transporte Público de Pasajeros, Ministerio de Planificación.
71. Investigating the Barriers in a Typical Journey by Public Transport Users with Disabilities10.1016/j.jth.2018.05.008 ↗
72. Seriani, S., Aprigliano, V., Peña, A., Gonzalez, S., Arredondo, B., Bastías, I., Bustos, E., Requesens, J., Lopez, A., and Fujiyama, T. (2025). An Experimental Pilot Approach to Evaluate the Infrastructure Accessibility and Level of Service at Metro Station Platforms. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15031221 ↗
73. Crowd dynamics and control in high-volume metro rail stations10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.097 ↗
74. On current crowd management practices and the need for increased situation awareness, prediction, and intervention10.1016/j.ssci.2016.09.006 ↗
75. Pedestrian small group behaviour and evacuation dynamics on metro station platform
76. Dynamic flow analysis and crowd management for transfer stations: A case study of Suzhou Metro10.1007/s12469-024-00357-8 ↗
77. Recent developments in crowd management: Theory and applications10.20965/jdr.2024.p0239 ↗