Accuracy and Reliability of Smartphone Versus Mirrorless Camera Images-Assisted Digital Shade Guides: An In Vitro Study

Image-assisted digital shade guides are increasingly popular for shade matching; however, research on their accuracy remains limited. This study aimed to compare the accuracy and reliability of color coordination in image-assisted digital shade guides constructed using calibrated images of their shade tabs captured by a mirrorless camera (Canon, Tokyo, Japan) (MC-DSG) and a smartphone camera (Samsung, Seoul, Korea) (SC-DSG), using a spectrophotometer as the reference standard. Twenty-nine VITA Linearguide 3D-Master shade tabs were photographed under controlled settings with both cameras equipped with cross-polarizing filters. Images were calibrated using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The L* (lightness), a* (red-green chromaticity), and b* (yellow-blue chromaticity) values, which represent the color attributes in the CIELAB color space, were computed at the middle third of each shade tab using Adobe Photoshop. Specifically, L* indicates the brightness of a color (ranging from black [0] to white [100]), a* denotes the position between red (+a*) and green (–a*), and b* represents the position between yellow (+b*) and blue (–b*). These values were used to quantify tooth shade and compare them to reference measurements obtained from a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade V, VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). Mean color differences (∆E00) between MC-DSG and SC-DSG, relative to the spectrophotometer, were compared using a independent t-test. The ∆E00 values were also evaluated against perceptibility (PT = 0.8) and acceptability (AT = 1.8) thresholds. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and group differences were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests (α = 0.05). SC-DSG showed significantly lower ΔE00 deviations than MC-DSG (p < 0.001), falling within acceptable clinical AT. The L* values from MC-DSG were significantly higher than SC-DSG (p = 0.024). All methods showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.9). The findings support the potential of smartphone image-assisted digital shade guides for accurate and reliable tooth shade assessment.