Music Similarity Detection Through Comparative Imagery Data
Source abstract
Abstract
In music, plagiarism has been an important but troubled issue, which becomes ever more critical with the widespread usage of generative AI tools. Meanwhile, the development of techniques for music similarity detection has been hampered by the scarcity of legally verified data on plagiarism. In this paper, we present a technical solution for training music similarity detection models through the use of comparative imagery data. With the aid of feature-based analysis and data visualization, we conducted experiments to analyze how different music features may contribute to the judgment of plagiarism. While the feature-based analysis guided us to focus on a subset of features, whose similarity is typically associated with music plagiarism, data visualization inspired us to train machine learning models using such comparative imagery instead of using audio signals directly. We trained feature-based sub-models (convolutional neural networks) using imagery data and an ensemble model with Bayesian interpretation for combining the predictions of the sub-models. We tested the trained model with legally verified data as well as AI-generated music, confirming that the models produced with our approach can detect similarity patterns which are typically associated with music plagiarism. Furthermore, using imagery data as the input and output of an ML model has been proven to facilitate explainable AI.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Music and Audio Processing · Diverse Musicological Studies · Digital Media Forensic Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Wilde, O. Imitation Is the Sincerest Form of Flattery That Mediocrity Can Pay to Greatness, circa 1890. Widely attributed to Oscar Wilde, though no definitive source confirms it in his published works.
2. UK Government (2024, April 18). Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/copyright-and-artificial-intelligence/copyright-and-artificial-intelligence.
3. A survey on music similarity and recommendation from music context data10.1145/2542205.2542206 ↗
4. Exploring the music similarity space on the web10.1145/1993036.1993038 ↗
5. Comparing content and context based similarity for musical data10.1016/j.neucom.2012.05.033 ↗
6. A Statistical Interpretation of Term Specificity and Its Application in Retrieval10.1108/eb026526 ↗
7. Research-paper recommender systems: A literature survey10.1007/s00799-015-0156-0 ↗
8. An adaptive meta-heuristic for music plagiarism detection based on text similarity and clustering10.1007/s10618-022-00835-2 ↗
9. De Prisco, R., Malandrino, D., Zaccagnino, G., and Zaccagnino, R. (2017, January 11–13). A computational intelligence text-based detection system of music plagiarism. Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), Hangzhou, China.10.1109/ICSAI.2017.8248347 ↗
10. Li, T., and Ogihara, M. (2004, January 17–21). Content-based music similarity search and emotion detection. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Montreal, QC, Canada.
11. Detecting Music Plagiarism Based on Melodic Analysis
12. Nair, R.R. (2021). Identification and Detection of Plagiarism in Music using Machine Learning Algorithms. [Master’s Thesis, National College of Ireland].
13. What may visualization processes optimize?10.1109/TVCG.2015.2513410 ↗
14. Chen, M. (2020). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Data Intelligence–Its Broader Interpretations. Advances in Info-Metrics: Information and Information Processing across Disciplines, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190636685.003.0016 ↗
15. An analysis of machine- and human-analytics in classification10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598829 ↗
16. McKay, C. (2024, January 17). jSymbolic Manual. Available online: https://jmir.sourceforge.net/manuals/jSymbolic_manual/home.html.
17. Constructive visual analytics for text similarity detection10.1111/cgf.12798 ↗
18. Visualizing ensemble predictions of music mood
19. LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J., Henderson, D., Howard, R., Hubbard, W., and Jackel, L. (1989, January 27–30). Handwritten Digit Recognition with a Back-Propagation Network. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Denver, CO, USA.
20. Cognitron: A self-organizing multilayered neural network10.1007/BF00342633 ↗
21. The Earth Mover’s Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval10.1023/A:1026543900054 ↗
22. Hamid, S., Wan, X., Jørgensen, M., Ru, B., and Osborne, M. (2023). Bayesian Quadrature for Neural Ensemble Search. arXiv.
23. MuseScore Ltd (2024, February 21). MuseScore Studio. Available online: https://musescore.org/en.
24. Google Magenta Team (2023, November 10). Magenta: Music and Art Generation with Machine Intelligence. Available online: https://github.com/magenta/magenta.
25. Hawthorne, C., Stasyuk, A., Roberts, A., Simon, I., Huang, C.Z.A., Dieleman, S., Elsen, E., Engel, J., and Eck, D. (2019, January 6–9). Enabling Factorized Piano Music Modeling and Generation with the MAESTRO Dataset. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, New Orleans, LA, USA. Available online: https://openreview.net/forum?id=r1lYRjC9F7.
26. Measuring When a Music Generation Algorithm Copies Too Much: The Originality Report, Cardinality Score, and Symbolic Fingerprinting by Geometric Hashing10.1007/s42979-022-01220-y ↗
27. Deep learning’s shallow gains: A comparative evaluation of algorithms for automatic music generation10.1007/s10994-023-06309-w ↗
28. Yin, Z., Reuben, F., Stepney, S., and Collins, T. (2021). “A Good Algorithm Does Not Steal—It Imitates”: The Originality Report as a Means of Measuring When a Music Generation Algorithm Copies Too Much. Artificial Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design: 10th International Conference, EvoMUSART 2021, Held as Part of EvoStar 2021, Virtual Event, 7–9 April 2021, Proceedings, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-72914-1_24 ↗
29. Google Magenta (2024, November 10). MAESTRO Dataset. Available online: https://magenta.tensorflow.org/datasets/maestro.
30. Liao, Z., and Chen, M. (2024, January 25–29). Image similarity using an ensemble of context-sensitive models. Proceedings of the KDD ’24: Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Barcelona, Spain.10.1145/3637528.3672004 ↗