journal article·2025-07-10Open access

A Next-Best-View Method for Complex 3D Environment Exploration Using Robotic Arm with Hand-Eye System

Michal Dobiš, Jakub Ivan, Martin Dekan, František Duchoň, Andrej Babinec, Róbert Málik

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 14

Abstract

The ability to autonomously generate up-to-date 3D models of robotic workcells is critical for advancing smart manufacturing, yet existing Next-Best-View (NBV) methods often rely on paradigms ill-suited for the fixed-base manipulators found in dynamic industrial environments. To address this gap, this paper proposes a novel NBV method for the complete exploration of a 6-DOF robotic arm’s workspace. Our approach integrates collision-based information gain metric, a potential field technique to generate candidate views from exploration frontiers, and a tunable fitness function to balance information gain with motion cost. The method was rigorously tested in three simulated scenarios and validated on a physical industrial robot. Results demonstrate that our approach successfully maps the majority of the workspace in all setups, with a balanced weighting strategy proving most effective for combining exploration speed and path efficiency, a finding confirmed in the real-world experiment. We conclude that our method provides a practical and robust solution for autonomous workspace mapping, offering a flexible, training-free approach that advances the state-of-the-art for on-demand 3D model generation in industrial robotics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Robot Manipulation and Learning

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Robotics and Cybernetics, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 3, 81219 Bratislava, Slovakia

Funding

KEGA · European Regional Development Fund

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Kang, Z., Yang, J., Yang, Z., and Cheng, S. (2020). Review of Techniques for 3D Reconstruction of Indoor Environments. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9050330 ↗
2. High Quality 3D Reconstruction Based on Fusion of Polarization Imaging and Binocular Stereo Vision10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.002 ↗
3. View Planning for Automated Three-Dimensional Object Reconstruction and Inspection10.1145/641865.641868 ↗
4. Umari, H., and Mukhopadhyay, S. (2017, January 24–28). Autonomous Robotic Exploration Based on Multiple Rapidly-Exploring Randomized Trees. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/IROS.2017.8202319 ↗
5. A comparison of volumetric information gain metrics for active 3D object reconstruction10.1007/s10514-017-9634-0 ↗
6. Lu, L., De Luca, A., Muratore, L., and Tsagarakis, N.G. (2022, January 28–30). An optimal frontier enhanced “next best view” planner for autonomous exploration. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE-RAS 21st International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Ginowan, Japan.10.1109/Humanoids53995.2022.10000175 ↗
7. A two-stage optimized next-view planning framework for 3-D unknown environment exploration, and structural reconstruction10.1109/LRA.2017.2655144 ↗
8. A global max-flow-based multi-resolution next-best-view method for reconstruction of 3d unknown objects10.1109/LRA.2021.3132430 ↗
9. A shadowcasting-based next-best-view planner for autonomous 3D exploration10.1109/LRA.2022.3146586 ↗
10. Butters, D., Jonasson, E.T., Stuart-Smith, R., and Pawar, V.M. (2019, January 3–8). Efficient environment guided approach for exploration of complex environments. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China.10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968563 ↗
11. Liu, C., Zhang, D., Liu, W., Sui, X., Huang, Y., Ma, X., Yang, X., and Wang, X. (2025). Enhancing autonomous exploration for robotics via real time map optimization and improved frontier costs. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-97231-9 ↗
12. Li, L., and Zhang, X. (2024). Boundary Exploration of Next Best View Policy in 3D Robotic Scanning. arXiv.
13. A probabilistic next best view planner for depth cameras based on deep learning10.1109/LRA.2021.3064298 ↗
14. Zeng, X., Zaenker, T., and Bennewitz, M. (2022, January 23–27). Deep reinforcement learning for next-best-view planning in agricultural applications. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811800 ↗
15. Lluvia, I., Lazkano, E., and Ansuategi, A. (2021). Active mapping and robot exploration: A survey. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21072445 ↗
16. Efficient Autonomous Exploration with Incrementally Built Topological Map in 3-D Environments10.1109/TIM.2020.3001816 ↗
17. OctoMap: An efficient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees10.1007/s10514-012-9321-0 ↗
18. Uríček, J., Poppeová a, V., Zahoranský, R., Bulej, V., Kuciak, J., and Durec, P. The Potential Fields Application for Mobile Robots Path Planning. Proceedings of the 12th International Research/Expert Conference, Instanbul, Turkey.
19. A Survey on Various Edge Detector Techniques10.1016/j.protcy.2012.05.033 ↗
20. View/state planning for three-dimensional object reconstruction under uncertainty10.1007/s10514-015-9531-3 ↗
21. Multidimensional Binary Search Trees Used for Associative Searching10.1145/361002.361007 ↗
22. Diebel, J. (2006). Representing Attitude: Euler Angles, Unit Quaternions, and Rotation Vectors, Matrix.
23. Kuffner, J.J., and LaValle, S.M. (2000, January 24–28). RRT-Connect: An Efficient Approach to Single-Query Path Planning. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), San Francisco, CA, USA.
24. Diankov, R. (2010). Automated Construction of Robotic Manipulation Programs, Carnegie Mellon University.
25. Dobiš, M., Dekan, M., Sojka, A., Beňo, P., and Duchoň, F. (2021). Cartesian Constrained Stochastic Trajectory Optimization for Motion Planning. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112411712 ↗
26. Dobiš, M., Dekan, M., Beňo, P., Duchoň, F., and Babinec, A. (2022). Evaluation Criteria for Trajectories of Robotic Arms. Robotics, 11.10.3390/robotics11010029 ↗