Modeling and Key Parameter Interaction Analysis for Ship Central Cooling Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
To achieve efficient prediction and optimization of the energy consumption of ship central cooling systems, this paper first constructed and validated a high-precision multi-physical domain simulation model of the ship central cooling system based on fluid heat transfer principles and the physical network method. Then, simulation experiments were designed using the Box–Behnken design (BBD) method to study the effects of five key parameters—main engine power, seawater temperature, seawater pump speed, low-temperature fresh water three-way valve opening, and low-temperature fresh water flow rate—on system energy consumption. Based on the simulation data, an energy consumption prediction model was constructed using response surface methodology (RSM). This prediction model exhibited excellent goodness of fit and prediction ability (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.9688, adjusted R2adj = 0.9438, predicted R2pred = 0.8752), with a maximum relative error of only 1.2% compared to the simulation data, confirming its high accuracy. Sensitivity analysis based on this prediction model indicated that main engine power, seawater pump speed, seawater temperature, and three-way valve opening were the dominant single factors affecting energy consumption. Further analysis revealed a significant interaction between main engine power and seawater pump speed. This interaction resulted in non-linear changes in system energy consumption, which were particularly prominent under operating conditions such as high power. This study provides an accurate prediction model and theoretical guidance on the influence patterns of key parameters for the simulation-driven design, operational optimization, and energy saving of ship central cooling systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies · Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Power Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China
Funding
Naval University of Engineering
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. A review of ship energy efficiency research and directions towards emission reduction in the maritime industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132888 ↗
2. A comprehensive review on the prediction of ship energy consumption and pollution gas emissions10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112826 ↗
3. Characteristics of real-world ship energy consumption and emissions based on onboard testing10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115411 ↗
4. Jeon, T.-Y., and Jung, B.-G. (2023). A Study of PI Controller Tuning Methods Using the Internal Model Control Guide for a Ship Central Cooling System as a Multi-Input, Single-Output System. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.20944/preprints202309.1594.v1 ↗
5. Energy efficiency analysis of a ship’s central cooling system using variable speed pump10.1080/20464177.2017.1283192 ↗
6. Jeon, T.Y., and Lee, Y.C. (2025). Energy saving in ship central cooling systems: IMC-Tuned PID with feedforward control. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 13.10.3390/jmse13030510 ↗
7. An energy-savings evaluation method for variable-frequency-drive applications on ship central cooling systems10.1109/TIA.2013.2271991 ↗
8. Jeon, T.-Y., Lee, C.-M., and Hur, J.-J. (2022). A study on the control solution of ship’s central fresh water-cooling system for efficient energy control based on merchant training ship. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10050679 ↗
9. Pariotis, E., Zannis, T., and Katsanis, J.S. (2019). An integrated approach for the assessment of central cooling retrofit using variable speed drive pump in marine applications. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 7.10.3390/jmse7080253 ↗
10. Yimchoy, S., and Supatti, U. (November, January 31). An energy-savings evaluation method for variable-frequency-drive applications on water pump systems. Proceedings of the 2021 24th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.10.23919/ICEMS52562.2021.9634486 ↗
11. Lee, C.M., Jeon, T.-Y., Jung, B.-G., and Lee, Y.-C. (2021). Design of energy saving controllers for central cooling water systems. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9050513 ↗
12. Load optimization of central cooling system pumps of a container ship for the slow steaming conditions to enhance the energy efficiency10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.030 ↗
13. Investigation of ship cooling system operation for improving energy efficiency10.1007/s00773-016-0395-9 ↗
14. Meyers, W.T. (2024). Design, Analysis and Modeling of a Modular Navy Integrated Power and Energy Corridor Cooling System, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
15. Wang, J., Zhao, F., Sun, L., Hou, Y., and Chen, N. (2023). Research on the energy savings of ships’ water cooling pump motors based on direct torque control. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11071938 ↗
16. Response surface methodology with prediction uncertainty: A multi-objective optimisation approach10.1016/j.cherd.2011.12.012 ↗
17. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019 ↗
18. Response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing engine performance and emissions fueled with biofuel: Review of RSM for sustainability energy transition10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101213 ↗
19. Chen, W. (2012). Research on Cascade Control Modeling and Simulation for Ship Central Cooling Systems, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
20. Experimental design and response surface methodology in energy applications: A tutorial review10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.021 ↗
21. Methods for experimental design, central composite design and the Box–Behnken design, to optimise operational parameters: A review10.1556/066.2023.00235 ↗