The IoT/IoE Integrated Security & Safety System of Pompeii Archeological Park
Source abstract
Abstract
Pompeii is widely known for its tragic past. In 79 A.D., a massive eruption of Mount Vesuvius buried the city and its inhabitants under volcanic ash. Lost for centuries, it was rediscovered in 1748 when the Bourbon monarchs initiated excavations, marking the beginning of systematic digs. Since then, Pompeii has gained worldwide recognition for its archeological wonders. Despite centuries of looting and damage, it remains a breathtaking site. With millions of visitors annually, the Pompeii Archeological Park is the one most visited site in Italy. Managing such a vast and complex heritage site requires significant effort to ensure both visitor safety and the preservation of its fragile structures. Accessibility is also crucial, particularly for individuals with disabilities and staff responsible for site management. To address these challenges, integrated systems and advanced technologies like the Internet of Things/Everything (IoT/IoE) can provide innovative solutions. These technologies connect people, smart devices (such as mobile terminals, sensors, and wearables), and data to optimize security, safety, and site management. This paper presents a security/safety IoT/IoE-based system for security, safety, management, and visitor services at the Pompeii Archeological Park.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Currency Recognition and Detection · Fire Detection and Safety Systems · Conservation Techniques and Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Safety & Security Project & Smart@Pompeii Project, Pompeii Archeological Park, Ministry of Culture, 80045 Pompeii, Italy
Safety & Security Engineering Group—DICMA, SAPIENZA—University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy
Wessex Institute of Technology, Ashurst Lodge, Ashurst, Southampton SO40 7AA, UK
Funding
National Operative Program
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. Berry, J. (2007). The Complete Pompeii, Thames & Hudson. [1st ed.].
2. Beard, M. (2010). The Fires of Vesuvius: Pompeii Lost and Found, Belknap Press. [1st ed.]. An Imprint of Harvard.10.2307/j.ctvjhzrpj ↗
3. Wilkinson, P. (2019). Pompeii: An Archaeological Guide, Bloomsbury Academic. [1st ed.].
4. Spina, L. (2023). Inside Pompeii, J. Paul Getty Museum. [1st ed.].
5. The integrated security system of the Vatican City State
6. The integrated security system of the Senate of the Italian Republic
7. Implementing an Internet of Everything system in the archaeological area of Quintili’s Villa in the Ancient Appia route park in Rome10.2495/SAFE170241 ↗
8. Garzia, F. (2016, January 24). An integrated multidisciplinary model for security management and related supporting integrated technological system. Proceedings of the IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technologies, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/CCST.2016.7815690 ↗
9. Wireless Sensor Platform for Cultural Heritage Monitoring and Modeling System10.3390/s17091998 ↗
10. Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Open Source Hardware Sensors: A Case Study of the Mosque-Cathedral of Córdoba10.3390/s16101620 ↗
11. Smart Tags: IoT Sensors for Monitoring the Micro-Climate of Cultural Heritage Monuments10.3390/app12052315 ↗
12. Monitoring of the Environmental Corrosivity in Museums by RFID Sensors: Application to Pollution Emitted by Archeological Woods10.3390/su13116158 ↗
13. Proposal of smart guide system for cultural heritage of archaeological sites using IoT-focusing on Hoeamsa Temple site in Yangju10.3934/mbe.2023384 ↗
14. Internet of Cultural Things: Current Research, Challenges and Opportunities
15. Acoustic Sensor Data Flow for Cultural Heritage Monitoring and Safeguarding10.3390/s19071629 ↗
16. Integrating Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things in Cultural Heritage Preservation: A Systematic Review of Risk Management and Environmental Monitoring Strategies10.3390/buildings14123979 ↗
17. Artificial intelligence-assisted visual inspection for cultural heritage: State-of-the-art review10.1016/j.culher.2024.01.005 ↗
18. An Integrated Object Tracking and Covert Visual MIMO Communication Service for Museum Security System Using Single Vision Sensor10.3390/app8101918 ↗
19. Structural Health Monitoring and Management of Cultural Heritage Structures: A State-of-the-Art Review10.3390/app13116450 ↗
20. Monitoring Looting at Cultural Heritage Sites: Applying Deep Learning on Optical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Data as a Solution10.1177/08944393231188471 ↗
21. Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology in the Protection of Goods of Cultural Interest (GCIs): The Case of the Castle of Cala (Huelva, Spain)10.3390/architecture4020015 ↗
22. Laugier, E.J., Abdullatif, N., and Glatz, C. (2022). Embedding the remote sensing monitoring of archaeological site damage at the local level: Results from the “Archaeological practice and heritage protection in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq” project. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0269796 ↗
23. How digital technologies have been applied for architectural heritage risk management: A systemic literature review from 2014 to 202410.1038/s40494-025-01558-5 ↗
24. Bruni, A., and Garzia, F. (2023, January 11). The New Communication Network for an Internet of Things/Everything Based Security/Safety/General Management/Visitor's Services for the Pompei Archaeological Park, Italy. Proceedings of the IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, Pune, India.10.1109/ICCST59048.2023.10474233 ↗
25. Goldberg, D.E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimisation and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley. [1st ed.].
26. Michalewicz, Z. (2013). Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, Springer. [3rd ed.].
27. (2022). Information Security, Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection—Information Security Management Systems—Requirements (Standard No. ISO/IEC 27001).
28. (2022). Code of Practice for Information Security Controls (Standard No. ISO/IEC 27002).
29. (2022). Information Security, Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection—Guidance on Managing Information Security Risks (Standard No. ISO/IEC 27005).
30. (2018–2024). Cybersecurity for Industrial Automation and Control Systems (Standard No. IEC 62443-x).
31. (2011). Systems and Software Engineering—Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)—System and Software Quality Models (Standard No. ISO/IEC 25010).
32. ONVIF Profile T Specification v1.0. Available online: https://www.onvif.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ONVIF_Profile_T_Specification_v1-0.pdf.
33. (2025, June 22). NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5–Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations, Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-53r5.pdf.
34. (2014). Intrusion and Hold-Up Alarm Systems. 2006–2020 CENELEC (Standard No. EN 50131-x).
35. (2012). CCTV Systems for Use in Security Applications (Standard No. EN 50132-x).
36. (2023–2015). Alarm and Electronic Security Systems–Electronic Access Control Systems (Standard No. EN 60839-11).
37. (2019). Monitoring and Alarm Receiving Centres (Standard No. EN 50518).
38. (2014). Video Surveillance Systems for Use in Security Applications (Standard No. EN 62676-x).
39. (2018). Alarm systems—Alarm transmission systems and equipment (Standard No. EN 50136-x).
40. (2002–2021). Social alarm systems (Standard No. EN 50134-x).
41. (2010). Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems (Standard No. IEC 61508).
42. (2009–2024). Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems (Standard No. IEC 62443).
43. (2005–2025). Building Automation and Control Systems (BACS) (Standard No. ISO 16484-x).
44. (2025). Programmable Logic Controllers (Standard No. IEC 61131-3).
45. (2024). Factory Acceptance and Site Acceptance Tests (Standard No. IEC 62381).
46. (2011). Network Performance Objectives for IP-Based Services (Standard No. Recommendation Y.1541).
47. Recommendation, Y. (2011). Ethernet Service Activation Test Methodology (Standard No. Recommendation Y.1564).
48. (2022). Requirements and Framework for Jitter Bound Guarantee in Large-Scale Networks Including IMT-2020 and Beyond (Standard No. Draft Recommendation Y.IMT2020-jg-lsn (Subsequently ITU-T Y.3118)).
49. Demichelis, C., and Chimento, P. (2002). RFC 3393: IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM), Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).10.17487/rfc3393 ↗
50. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate, and National Urban Security Technology Laboratory (2025). Video Security Systems Technology Handbook, U.S. DHS.
51. U.S. Department of Defense (1995). MIL-HDBK-217F Notice 2: Military Handbook–Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment, Department of Defense.
52. Stouffer, K., Pillitteri, V.Y., Lightman, S., Abrams, M., and Hahn, A. (2022). Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security—NIST Special Publication 800-82 Revision 3, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
53. Fagan, M., Marron, J., Olivieri, J., and Davidson, M.J. (2020). IoT Device Cybersecurity Capability Core Baseline (Final), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NIST IR 8259A.10.6028/NIST.IR.8259a ↗
54. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2024). Cybersecurity Framework 2.0, NIST.
55. (2021). Industrial Communication Networks –High Availability Automation Networks–Part 3: Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) and High-availability Seamless Redundancy (HSR) (Standard No. IEC 62439-3:2021).
56. (2004). Reliability Data Handbook–Universal Model for Reliability Prediction of Electronics Components, PCBs and Equipment (Standard No. IEC TR 62380:2004).
57. (2023). Low Latency Communication White Paper (Standard No. IEEE 802.24 TAG).
58. (2014). On-Premises RF Products–Technical Report–Terminology for Use in Specifying Product Parameters (Standard No. SIA RF-01-2014).
59. (2008). Digital Video Interface Data Model (Standard No. ANSI/SIA OSIPS-DVI-01:2008).
60. (2008). Open, Systems Integration and Performance Standards Framework (Standard No. ANSI/SIA OSIPS-01:2008).
61. (2001). Receiver-to-Computer Interface Protocol (Type 2)–for Central Station Equipment Communications (Standard No. DC-07-2001.04).
62. (1992). Generic Protocols Technical Report (Standard No. DC-02-1992.02 (R2000.05)).
63. (1988). DCS Computer Interface (CIS-1) Technical Report (Standard No. DC-01-1988 (R2001.04)).
64. (2000). Mobile Security Devices Standard–Monitoring Practices for False Dispatch Prevention (Standard No. ANSI/SIA MSD-01-2000).
65. ONVIF (2019). ONVIF Profile S Specification, ONVIF. Version 1.3.
66. ONVIF (2021). ONVIF Profile M Specification, ONVIF. Version 1.0.
67. ONVIF (2017). ONVIF Profile A Specification, ONVIF. Version 1.0.
68. ONVIF (2014). ONVIF Profile C Specification, ONVIF. Version 1.0.
69. ONVIF (2021). ONVIF Profile D Specification, ONVIF. Version 1.0.
70. ONVIF (2022). ONVIF Core Specification, ONVIF. Version 2.42.
71. Impact of Environmental Stress on Network Latency in Surveillance Systems
72. Şengönül, E., Samet, R., Abu Al-Haija, Q., Alqahtani, A., Alturki, B., and Alsulami, A.A. (2023). An Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Surveillance Video Anomaly Detection: A Comprehensive Survey. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13084956 ↗
73. Rausand, M. (2013). High-Availability System Design, Springer. [1st ed.].
74. Colbert, E., and Kott, A. (2016). Security Metrics in Industrial Control Systems. Cyber Security of Industrial Control Systems, Including SCADA Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-32125-7 ↗
75. AnomLite: Efficient binary and multiclass video anomaly detection10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104162 ↗
76. Gibbons, P., Pekhimenko, C., and De Sa, C. VQPy: An Object-Oriented Approach to Modern Video Analytics. Proceedings of the Machine Learning and Systems (MLSys) 2024.
77. Secure Crowd AI–Crowd Estimation and Surveillance System