Trajectory Optimization with Dynamic Drivable Corridor-Based Collision Avoidance
Source abstract
Abstract
Trajectory planning for autonomous vehicles is essential for ensuring driving safety, passenger comfort, and operational efficiency. Collision avoidance constraints introduce significant computational complexity due to their inherent non-convex and nonlinear characteristics. Previous research has proposed the drivable corridor (DC) method, which transforms complex collision avoidance constraints into linear inequalities by constructing time-varying rectangular corridors within the spatiotemporal domains, thereby enhancing optimization efficiency. However, the DC construction process involves repetitive collision detection, leading to an increased computational burden. To address this limitation, this study proposes a novel approach that integrates grid-based obstacle representation with dynamic grid merging to accelerate collision detection and dynamically constructs the DC by adaptively adjusting the expansion strategies according to available spatial dimensions. The feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method are validated through simulation-based evaluations conducted over 100 representative scenarios characterized by diverse and unstructured environmental configurations. The simulation results indicate that, with appropriately selected grid resolutions, the proposed approach achieves up to a 60% reduction in trajectory planning time compared to conventional DC-based planners while maintaining robust performance in complex environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Funding
Yuelushan Center for Industrial Innovation
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. A survey of autonomous driving: Common practices and emerging technologies10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983149 ↗
2. Personalized trajectory planning and control of lane-change maneuvers for autonomous driving10.1109/TVT.2021.3076473 ↗
3. Use of social interaction and intention to improve motion prediction within automated vehicle framework: A review10.1109/TITS.2022.3207347 ↗
4. Motion planning for autonomous driving: The state of the art and future perspectives10.1109/TIV.2023.3274536 ↗
5. Song, X., Gao, H., Ding, T., Gu, Y., Liu, J., and Tian, K. (2023). A review of the motion planning and control methods for automated vehicles. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23136140 ↗
6. Real-time motion planning methods for autonomous on-road driving: State-of-the-art and future research directions10.1016/j.trc.2015.09.011 ↗
7. Unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs): Collision avoidance systems and approaches10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000064 ↗
8. Sampling-based robot motion planning: A review10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2302442 ↗
9. Ajanovic, Z., Lacevic, B., Shyrokau, B., Stolz, M., and Horn, M. (2018, January 1–5). Search-based optimal motion planning for automated driving. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Madrid, Spain.10.1109/IROS.2018.8593813 ↗
10. Wang, S. (2015). State Lattice-Based Motion Planning for Autonomous On-Road Driving. [Ph.D. Thesis, Freie Universitaet Berlin].
11. Research on Intelligent Vehicle Path Planning Based on Rapidly-Exploring Random Tree
12. Gammell, J.D., Srinivasa, S.S., and Barfoot, T.D. (2014, January 14–18). Informed RRT*: Optimal sampling-based path planning focused via direct sampling of an admissible ellipsoidal heuristic. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/IROS.2014.6942976 ↗
13. Practical search techniques in path planning for autonomous driving
14. Tu, K., Yang, S., Zhang, H., and Wang, Z. (2019, January 26–29). Hybrid A* based motion planning for autonomous vehicles in unstructured environment. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Sapporo, Japan.10.1109/ISCAS.2019.8702779 ↗
15. Path planning for smart car based on Dijkstra algorithm and dynamic window approach10.1155/2021/8881684 ↗
16. Mixed-integer and conditional trajectory planning for an autonomous mining truck in loading/dumping scenarios: A global optimization approach10.1109/TIV.2022.3214777 ↗
17. Svensson, L., Masson, L., Mohan, N., Ward, E., Brenden, A.P., and Feng, L. (2018, January 26–30). Safe stop trajectory planning for highly automated vehicles: An optimal control problem formulation. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Suzhou, China.10.1109/IVS.2018.8500536 ↗
18. Embodied footprints: A safety-guaranteed collision-avoidance model for numerical optimization-based trajectory planning10.1109/TITS.2023.3316175 ↗
19. Fast planning and tracking of complex autonomous parking maneuvers with optimal control and pseudo-neural networks10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3330431 ↗
20. Optimization-based collision avoidance10.1109/TCST.2019.2949540 ↗
21. Integrated online trajectory planning and optimization in distinctive topologies10.1016/j.robot.2016.11.007 ↗
22. Trajectory planning for autonomous valet parking in narrow environments with enhanced hybrid a* search and nonlinear optimization10.1109/TIV.2023.3268088 ↗
23. Kalakrishnan, M., Chitta, S., Theodorou, E., Pastor, P., and Schaal, S. (2011, January 9–13). STOMP: Stochastic trajectory optimization for motion planning. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980280 ↗
24. Path planning and tracking for vehicle collision avoidance based on model predictive control with multiconstraints10.1109/TVT.2016.2555853 ↗
25. Collision avoidance for autonomous vehicles based on MPC with adaptive APF10.1109/TIV.2023.3337417 ↗
26. Motion planning with sequential convex optimization and convex collision checking10.1177/0278364914528132 ↗
27. Li, B., Acarman, T., Peng, X., Zhang, Y., Bian, X., and Kong, Q. (2020, January 12–15). Maneuver planning for automatic parking with safe travel corridors: A numerical optimal control approach. Proceedings of the 2020 European Control Conference (ECC), Saint Petersburg, Russia.10.23919/ECC51009.2020.9143786 ↗
28. Autonomous driving on curvy roads without reliance on Frenet frame: A Cartesian-based trajectory planning method10.1109/TITS.2022.3145389 ↗
29. Optimization-based trajectory planning for autonomous parking with irregularly placed obstacles: A lightweight iterative framework10.1109/TITS.2021.3109011 ↗
30. Zips, P., Bock, M., and Kugi, A. (2013, January 3–7). A fast motion planning algorithm for car parking based on static optimization. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/IROS.2013.6696692 ↗
31. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y ↗
32. A unified motion planning method for parking an autonomous vehicle in the presence of irregularly placed obstacles10.1016/j.knosys.2015.04.016 ↗
33. Path homotopy invariants and their application to optimal trajectory planning10.1007/s10472-018-9596-8 ↗