The Microstructures of Tetradesmus obliquus Biofilms Formed Under Different Nutrient Supplies
Source abstract
Abstract
The microstructures of microalgae biofilms affect biofilms’ growth, which is critical in developing efficient microalgae biofilm-based culture systems. Herein, the microstructures of Tetradesmus obliquus biofilms cultured under different nutrients were in situ observed with confocal laser scanning microscopes. The surface structures and internal pore structures for these biofilms were determined quantitatively. The results indicated that the surfaces of these biofilms were all wrinkled with many folds in micrometres. The biofilms cultured under BG11, BG11+glycerine, BG11+urea, and BG11+NH4Cl nutrients had small pores with diameters of 15~30 μm, whereas the biofilms formed under BG11+NaHCO3 and BG11+NaNO3 presented many large pores with diameters of 50~150 μm. The mechanism of forming different microstructures of these nutrients was interpreted by analyzing cell surface properties. We found that the cells cultured under BG11+NaHCO3 and BG11+NaNO3 had more hydrophobic surface groups. The high cell–cell interactions between hydrophobic cells made cells tend to aggregate together and form biofilms with more inner pores, which may be conducive to cell growth and biofilm development. The study offers new insights into understanding the microstructural characteristics of microalgae biofilms cultured under different nutrients, providing important guidance for the development of biofilm-based culture systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diatoms and Algae Research · Algal biology and biofuel production · Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Beijing Engineering Research Center of Energy Saving and Environmental Protection, Beijing 100083, China
Beijing Key Laboratory for Energy Saving and Emission Reduction of Metallurgical Industry, Beijing 100083, China
Funding
National Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Current Bottlenecks and Challenges of the Microalgal Biorefinery10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.09.006 ↗
2. Multi−Product Microalgae Biorefineries: From Concept Towards Reality10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.011 ↗
3. Koruyucu, A., Peest, T., Korzin, E., Gröninger, L., Brück, T., and Weuster−Botz, D. (2024). Cell Disruption and Hydrolysis of Microchloropsis salina Biomass as a Feedstock for Fermentation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14219667 ↗
4. Sharma, R., Mishra, A., Pant, D., and Malaviya, P. (2022). Recent advances in microalgae−based remediation of industrial and non−industrial wastewaters with simultaneous recovery of value−added products. Bioresour. Technol., 344.10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126129 ↗
5. Mofijur, M., Rahman, S.M.A., Nguyen, L.N., Mahlia, T.M.I., and Nghiem, L.D. (2022). Selection of microalgae strains for sustainable production of aviation biofuel. Bioresour. Technol., 345.10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126408 ↗
6. Anaerobic digestion of microalgal biomass for bioenergy production, removal of nutrients and microcystin: Current status10.1111/jam.15000 ↗
7. Katsimichas, A., Katsouli, M., Spantidos, N., Giannakourou, M.C., and Taoukis, P. (2024). Effect of High−Pressure Homogenization on the Functional and Emulsifying Properties of Proteins Recovered from Auxenochlorella pyrenoidosa. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15010131 ↗
8. Light/dark cycle of microalgae cells in raceway ponds: Effects of paddlewheel rotational speeds and baffles installation10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.108 ↗
9. Microalgal attachment and attached systems for biomass production and wastewater treatment10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.081 ↗
10. Comparison of Chlorella vulgaris biomass productivity cultivated in biofilm and suspension from the aspect of light transmission and microalgae affinity to carbon dioxide10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.099 ↗
11. Wang, J., Liu, J., and Liu, T. (2015). The difference in effective light penetration may explain the superiority in photosynthetic efficiency of attached cultivation over the conventional open pond for microalgae. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 8.10.1186/s13068-015-0240-0 ↗
12. biofilm-based algal cultivation systems10.1007/s00253-015-6736-5 ↗
13. Microalgae−bacteria biofilms: A sustainable synergistic approach in remediation of acid mine drainage10.1007/s00253-017-8693-7 ↗
14. Optimizing culture conditions for heterotrophic−assisted photoautotrophic biofilm growth of Chlorella vulgaris to simultaneously improve microalgae biomass and lipid productivity10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.116 ↗
15. A Methodological Review on the Characterization of Microalgal Biofilm and Its Extracellular Polymeric Substances10.1111/jam.15455 ↗
16. Substrate properties as controlling parameters in attached algal cultivation10.1007/s00253-021-11127-y ↗
17. A time−space model for the growth of microalgae biofilms for biofuel production10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.08.017 ↗
18. Analyzing microalgal biofilm structures formed under different light conditions by evaluating cell–cell interactions10.1016/j.jcis.2020.09.057 ↗
19. Fanesi, A., Paule, A., Bernard, O., Briandet, R., and Lopes, F. (2019). The architecture of monospecific microalgae biofilms. Microorganisms, 7.10.3390/microorganisms7090352 ↗
20. Liquid transport facilitated by channels in Bacillus subtilis biofilms10.1073/pnas.1216376110 ↗
21. Fanesi, A., Lavayssiere, M., Breton, C., Bernard, O., Briandet, R., and Lopes, F. (2021). Shear stress affects the architecture and cohesion of Chlorella vulgaris biofilms. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-83523-3 ↗
22. The self−adaption capability of microalgal biofilm under different light intensities: Photosynthetic parameters and biofilm microstructures10.1016/j.algal.2021.102383 ↗
23. Cell Surface Energy Affects the Structure of Microalgal Biofilm10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00274 ↗
24. Effects of nitrogen source and nitrogen supply model on the growth and hydrocarbon accumulation of immobilized biofilm cultivation of B. braunii10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.045 ↗
25. Development of nitrogen supply strategy for Scenedesmus rubescens attached cultivation toward growth and lipid accumulation10.1007/s00449-017-1877-9 ↗
26. Wu, X., Cen, Q., Addy, M., Zheng, H., Luo, S., Liu, Y., Cheng, Y., Zhou, W., Chen, P., and Ruan, R. (2019). A novel algal biofilm photobioreactor for efficient hog manure wastewater utilization and treatment. Bioresour. Technol., 292.10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121925 ↗
27. Optimizing carbon dioxide utilization for microalgae biofilm cultivation10.1002/bit.26199 ↗
28. Impact of the accumulation and adhesion of released oxygen during Scenedesmus obliquus photosynthesis on biofilm formation and growth10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.145 ↗
29. Biomass quantification and 3−D topography reconstruction of microalgal biofilms using digital image processing10.1016/j.algal.2021.102243 ↗
30. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT10.1099/00221287-146-10-2395 ↗
31. Physico−chemical surface properties of microalgae10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.08.001 ↗
32. The relation between Escherichia coli surface functional groups’ composition and their physicochemical properties10.1590/S1517-83822008000100003 ↗
33. The use of X−ray photoelectron spectroscopy for the study of oral streptococcal cell surfaces10.1177/08959374970110040301 ↗
34. Surface of lactic acid bacteria: Relationships between chemical composition and physicochemical properties10.1128/AEM.66.6.2548-2554.2000 ↗
35. Investigating dynamic processes in a porous substrate biofilm photobioreactor—A modeling approach10.1016/j.algal.2015.11.006 ↗