journal article·2020-04Open access

The feasibility of CO₂‐laser‐induced breakdown spectroscopy for fast lead determination in glass cullet

Sebastian Lehmann, Maike Fischer, Andreas Rosin, Thorsten Gerdes, Walter Krenkel

Abstract

Abstract With an overall collection and recycling rate of 74%, the material cycle for glass packaging is well established in the European Union. However, knowledge of the composition of the recycled glass cullet is necessary to avoid creeping accumulation of undesirable contaminants into the material cycle. Due to their toxic properties, this applies in particular for heavy metals, for example, lead. The state‐of‐the‐art technology for detection of lead in recycling glass sorting is X‐ray fluorescence (XRF). Due to lower regulatory demands, as well as increasingly economical hardware, laser‐based detection techniques, like Laser‐Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) may provide an alternate approach in industrial glass sorting to reach comparable detection limits and rates. In our work, CO 2 ‐LIBS was investigated as an alternative tool for the determination of lead in glass cullet. Instead of usually utilized spectrometers, a combination of spectral filters and photodiode was employed to facilitate a fast detection rate. Glass samples with different lead content were investigated in two spectral ranges with respect to detection limits, detection speed, and accuracy. The results are compared to a commercial XRF‐sorting machine for glass cullet. It was found that comparable speeds and accuracies for lead detection in glasses can be reached.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma · Analytical chemistry methods development · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Keylab Glass Technology Department of Ceramic Materials Engineering University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany

Funding

European Regional Development Fund

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. EU Glass Packaging Closed Loop Recycling Steady at 74 percent; 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 4].https://feve.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Rec-Stats-2015-Press-Release-FINAL.pdf
2. 10.1177/0734242X0934214810.1177/0734242X09342148 ↗
3. 10.1002/9781118095348.ch1610.1002/9781118095348.ch16 ↗
4. 10.1111/ijag.1255510.1111/ijag.12555 ↗
5. 10.1039/cs997260013310.1039/cs9972600133 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11356-016-6333-x10.1007/s11356-016-6333-x ↗
7. 10.1002/9781118095348.ch510.1002/9781118095348.ch5 ↗
8. Exposure to lead and cadmium released from ceramics and glassware intended to come into contact with food
9. Glass Technology Services LTD.Investigation Of The Significant Factors In Elemental Migration From Glass In Contact With Food;2002[cited 2019 Nov 19].https://www.glass-ts.com/projects/investigation-of-the-significant-factors-in-elemental-migration-from-glass-in-contact-with-food
10. Gesetzüber das Inverkehrbringen die Rücknahme unddie hochwertige Verwertung von Verpackungen: Verpackungsgesetz ‐ VerpackG;2017In: Bundesgesetzblatt. p.2234–61[cited 2019 May 21].https://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?start=//*%5b@attr_xml:id=%27%27%5d#__bgbl__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27bgbl117s2234.pdf%27%5D__1558428071762
11. Council Directive 84/500/EEC of 15 October 1984 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to ceramic articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs: 84/500/EEC;1984. (vol 27) [cited 2019 Nov 19].https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1984/500/oj
12. Position paper on food contact materials;2019[cited 2019 Nov 19].https://glassforeurope.com/food-contact-materials/
13. FoodKE.Contact Materials ‐ Regulation (EC) 1935/2004: European Implementation Assessment: European Parliamentary Research Service;2016[cited 2019 Nov 19].http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/581411/EPRS_STU(2016)581411_EN.pdf
14. 10.1016/B978-0-12-396459-5.00014-310.1016/B978-0-12-396459-5.00014-3 ↗
15. 10.1246/cl.2004.95610.1246/cl.2004.956 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11356-017-0243-410.1007/s11356-017-0243-4 ↗
17. 10.1080/09593330.2014.92173110.1080/09593330.2014.921731 ↗
18. 10.1007/978-3-540-36722-210.1007/978-3-540-36722-2 ↗
19. 10.1039/c3ja50128k10.1039/c3ja50128k ↗
20. Weiss M · 2012
21. REDWAVE XRF‐G;2019[cited 2019 May 20].http://www.redwave.com/en/recycling/glass/sensor-based/redwave-xrf-g/
22. 10.1016/S1872-2040(17)61040-510.1016/S1872-2040(17)61040-5 ↗
23. 10.1039/C8JA00076J10.1039/C8JA00076J ↗
24. 10.1039/C4JA00363B10.1039/C4JA00363B ↗
25. 10.1366/11-0657410.1366/11-06574 ↗
26. 10.1002/978111856737110.1002/9781118567371 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.dsr.2014.10.00610.1016/j.dsr.2014.10.006 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.00510.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.005 ↗
29. 10.1029/2018GL07921010.1029/2018GL079210 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.sab.2014.02.00110.1016/j.sab.2014.02.001 ↗
31. Miziolek AW · 2008
32. 10.1366/00037021079356169110.1366/000370210793561691 ↗
33. KramidaA RalchenkoY.NIST atomic spectra database NIST standard reference database 78.1999.
34. 10.1016/j.sab.2014.08.03910.1016/j.sab.2014.08.039 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.sab.2017.09.01010.1016/j.sab.2017.09.010 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.sab.2006.09.00310.1016/j.sab.2006.09.003 ↗
37. 10.1177/146808741559762910.1177/1468087415597629 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.sab.2009.07.01310.1016/j.sab.2009.07.013 ↗
39. Weiss M · 2011
40. Toxics in Packaging Clearinghouse. Glass Matrix Test Methods Evaluation for Toxics in Packaging;2014[cited 2019 Nov 19].https://toxicsinpackaging.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/GlassMatrixReport-Final-Report-Feb-2014.pdf