Melting rate correlation with batch properties and melter operating conditions during conversion of nuclear waste melter feeds to glasses
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The rate of conversion of nuclear waste melter feed to glass is affected by the selection of melter feed materials and by melter design and operation. The melting rate correlation (MRC) is an equation that relates the glass production rate with two types of variables: (a) feed and melt properties: conversion heat, cold‐cap bottom temperature, and glass melt viscosity; and (b) melter design and operation parameters: melter geometry, melter operating temperature, and gas bubbling rate. The MRC shows good agreement for an extended melting rate data set of high‐level waste (HLW) melter feeds and a data set generated for low‐activity waste (LAW) melter feeds. Laboratory observation of heated melter feed samples is often used to assess the cold‐cap bottom temperature of HLW melter feeds (moderately foaming feeds), but this technique appears inadequate for LAW melter feeds (vigorously foaming feeds). For LAW feeds, an adequate assessment of the cold‐cap bottom temperature was achieved using evolved gas analysis, which allows identification of the collapse of primary foam for oxidized feeds. This assessment shows that the cold‐cap bottom temperature for vigorously foaming LAW feeds is higher than that for moderately foaming HLW feeds. When the results of MRC are compared, LAW feeds are generally less sensitive to the bubbling rate and melt viscosity, and more sensitive to the cold‐cap bottom temperature than HLW feeds. The MRC qualifies as a promising tool to support the selection of melter feed materials and melter operating conditions, which is determined from expensive independent scaled melter experiments, and sophisticated mathematical models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Granular flow and fluidized beds · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USA
Laboratory of Inorganic Materials University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic
North Wind Solutions, LLC Support Services Contractor to the Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Richland WA USA
U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Richland WA USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TIA.1986.450481410.1109/TIA.1986.4504814 ↗
2. Guerrero HN · 2004 · 131
3. 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.11.04410.1016/j.anucene.2017.11.044 ↗
4. Role of glass melt flow in container furnace examined by mathematical modelling
5. 10.1111/jace.1259710.1111/jace.12597 ↗
6. Testing and modelling the behavior of platinoids during vitrification of high level radioactive waste. Part 1
7. 10.1016/0022-3093(80)90536-010.1016/0022-3093(80)90536-0 ↗
8. 10.1299/jpes.2.44710.1299/jpes.2.447 ↗
9. MiyasakaI UchiyamaM FujiwaraH KomamineS KanehiraN.Development of numerical simulation of HLLW vitrification melter. Thermal Engineering Conference: Japan Science and Technology Agency.2015. p.G113–1–2.10.1299/jsmeted.2015._G113-1_ ↗
10. The semiempirical model of the multicomponent bubble behavior in glass melts
11. 10.1111/jace.1377510.1111/jace.13775 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.proche.2012.10.09010.1016/j.proche.2012.10.090 ↗
13. SchillP TrochtaM.Advanced mathematical modeling of special glass furnaces. 6th EGS Conference.Montpellier France:2002 Glass Odyssey;2002.
14. SimonisF deWaalH BeerkensR.Influence of furnace design and operation parameters on the residence time distribution of glass tanks predicted by computer simulation. International Congress on Glass. Calcutta: Indian Ceramic Society.1986. p.118–27.
15. 10.1111/ijag.1266610.1111/ijag.12666 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00023.x10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00023.x ↗
17. 10.1111/jace.1646310.1111/jace.16463 ↗
18. 10.1111/jace.1728110.1111/jace.17281 ↗
19. 10.1111/ijag.1235310.1111/ijag.12353 ↗
20. Bickford DF · 1991 · 283
21. 10.1007/978-94-011-9757-1_1110.1007/978-94-011-9757-1_11 ↗
22. 10.1557/JMR.1995.213710.1557/JMR.1995.2137 ↗
23. 10.1111/jace.1667510.1111/jace.16675 ↗
24. Thermodynamics of batch melting
25. 10.1016/0021-9797(90)90262-M10.1016/0021-9797(90)90262-M ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.12710.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.127 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.11.00910.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.11.009 ↗
28. 10.1111/jace.1376610.1111/jace.13766 ↗
29. 10.1111/jace.1431010.1111/jace.14310 ↗
30. MatlackKS GanH ChaudhuriM KotWK GongW BardakciT et al.Melt Rate Enhancement for High Aluminum HLW Glass Formulations.Washington DC & Columbia MD:Vitreous State Laboratory and Energy Solutions;2008. Report No.: VSL‐08R1360‐1.
31. MatlackKS GanH ChaudhuriM KotWK GongW BardakciT et al.DM100 and DM1200 Melter Testing with High Waste Loading Glass Formulations for Hanford High‐Aluminum HLW Streams.Washington DC & Columbia MD:Vitreous State Laboratory and EnergySolutions;2010. Report No.: VSL‐10R1690‐1.
32. Effect of glass‐batch makeup on the melting process
33. 10.2172/117864710.2172/1178647 ↗
34. 10.1111/jace.1462910.1111/jace.14629 ↗
35. Matlack KS · 2004
36. Matlack KS · 2005
37. Matlack KS · 2002
38. Matlack KS · 2002
39. Matlack KS · 2003
40. Matlack KS · 2006
41. Matlack KS · 2007
42. Chapman CC · 2001
43. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.00910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.009 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tca.2013.02.01610.1016/j.tca.2013.02.016 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.11986010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119860 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.00210.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.002 ↗
47. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb05712.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb05712.x ↗
48. Redox and sulphur reactions in glass melting processes
49. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb10018.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb10018.x ↗
50. 10.1111/jace.1687610.1111/jace.16876 ↗
51. Matlack KS · 2015
52. VanderVeer B · 2016
53. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.02.01910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.02.019 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.05.03010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.05.030 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.01.00710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.01.007 ↗
56. 10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-610.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6 ↗
57. UsherW HermanJ.SALib ‐ sensitivity analysis library in Python.2016.
58. 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.01810.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018 ↗