Transfer Learning in Multimodal Sunflower Drought Stress Detection
Source abstract
Abstract
Efficient water supply and timely detection of drought stress in crops to increase yields is an important task considering that agriculture is the primary consumer of water globally. This is particularly significant for plants such as sunflowers, which are an important source of quality edible oils, essential for human nutrition. Traditional detection methods are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and rely on advanced sensor technologies. We introduce an innovative approach based on neural networks and transfer learning for drought stress detection using a novel dataset including 209 non-invasive rhizotron images and 385 images of manually cleaned sections of sunflowers, subjected to normal watering or water stress. We used five neural network models: VGG16, VGG19, InceptionV3, DenseNet, and MobileNet, pre-trained on the ImageNet dataset, whose performance was compared to select the most efficient architecture. Accordingly, the most efficient model, MobileNet, was further refined using different data augmentation mechanisms. The introduction of targeted data augmentation and the use of grayscale images proved to be effective, demonstrating improved results, with an F1 score and an accuracy of 0.95. This approach encourages advances in water stress detection, highlighting the value of artificial intelligence in improving crop health monitoring and management for more resilient agricultural practices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Agriculture and AI · Remote Sensing in Agriculture · Irrigation Practices and Water Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Maksima Gorkog 30, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Funding
Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia · Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation · Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Breeding of Climate-Resilient Crops
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. (2024, April 17). Agriculture|UN World Water Development Report. Available online: https://www.unesco.org/reports/wwdr/2022/en/agriculture.
2. Drought Stress in Sunflower: Physiological Effects and Its Management through Breeding and Agronomic Alternatives10.1016/j.agwat.2018.01.028 ↗
3. Safdar, M., Shahid, M.A., Sarwar, A., Rasul, F., Majeed, M.D., and Sabir, R.M. (2023). Crop Water Stress Detection Using Remote Sensing Techniques. Environ. Sci. Proc., 25.10.3390/ECWS-7-14198 ↗
4. Remote Sensing and Control of an Irrigation System Using a Distributed Wireless Sensor Network10.1109/TIM.2008.917198 ↗
5. Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture for Optimisation of Irrigation and Application of Pesticides and Herbicides
6. Crop Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Review10.1016/j.compag.2020.105709 ↗
7. Oil Yield Prediction for Sunflower Hybrid Selection Using Different Machine Learning Algorithms10.1038/s41598-023-44999-3 ↗
8. Advanced Agricultural Disease Image Recognition Technologies: A Review
9. Farooq, M.S., Riaz, S., Abid, A., Umer, T., and Zikria, Y.B. (2020). Role of IoT Technology in Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9020319 ↗
10. Big Data in Smart Farming—A Review10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023 ↗
11. Agriculture 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review on the Paradigm, Technologies and Benefits10.1016/j.futures.2022.102998 ↗
12. Araújo, S.O., Peres, R.S., Barata, J., Lidon, F., and Ramalho, J.C. (2021). Characterising the Agriculture 4.0 Landscape—Emerging Trends, Challenges and Opportunities. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11040667 ↗
13. de Oliveira, R.C., and Silva, R.D.d.S.e. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: Benefits, Challenges, and Trends. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13137405 ↗
14. Identifying Crop Water Stress Using Deep Learning Models10.1007/s00521-020-05325-4 ↗
15. Barradas, A., Correia, P.M.P., Silva, S., Mariano, P., Pires, M.C., Matos, A.R., Da Silva, A.B., and Marques Da Silva, J. (2021). Comparing Machine Learning Methods for Classifying Plant Drought Stress from Leaf Reflectance Spectra in Arabidopsis thaliana. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11146392 ↗
16. Remote Sensing and Machine Learning for Crop Water Stress Determination in Various Crops: A Critical Review10.1007/s11119-020-09711-9 ↗
17. An, J., Li, W., Li, M., Cui, S., and Yue, H. (2019). Identification and Classification of Maize Drought Stress Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network. Symmetry, 11.10.3390/sym11020256 ↗
18. The Power of Transfer Learning in Agricultural Applications: AgriNet10.3389/fpls.2022.992700 ↗
19. The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data10.1109/MIS.2009.36 ↗
20. Madsen, S.L., Mathiassen, S.K., Dyrmann, M., Laursen, M.S., Paz, L.-C., and Jørgensen, R.N. (2020). Open Plant Phenotype Database of Common Weeds in Denmark. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12081246 ↗
21. A New Lightweight Deep Neural Network for Surface Scratch Detection10.1007/s00170-022-10335-8 ↗
22. The Plant Pathology Challenge 2020 Data Set to Classify Foliar Disease of Apples10.1002/aps3.11390 ↗
23. Yang, S., Zheng, L., Chen, X., Zabawa, L., Zhang, M., and Wang, M. (2022, January 19–20). Transfer Learning from Synthetic In-Vitro Soybean Pods Dataset for In-Situ Segmentation of On-Branch Soybean Pods. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPRW56347.2022.00173 ↗
24. Kamarudin, M.H., Ismail, Z.H., and Saidi, N.B. (2021). Deep Learning Sensor Fusion in Plant Water Stress Assessment: A Comprehensive Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11041403 ↗
25. Škorić, D. (2016). Sunflower Breeding for Resistance to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants—Recent Advances and Future Perspectives, InTech.10.5772/62159 ↗
26. Chollet, F. (2024, April 27). Keras. Available online: https://github.com/fchollet/keras.
27. (2024, April 22). A Rotation and a Translation Suffice: Fooling CNNs with Simple Transformations. Available online: https://browse.arxiv.org/pdf/1712.02779v2.
28. A Survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 ↗
29. Han, J., Fang, P., Li, W., Hong, J., Armin, M.A., Reid, I., Petersson, L., and Li, H. (2022, January 15). You Only Cut Once: Boosting Data Augmentation with a Single Cut. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, Baltimore, MD, USA.
30. Ben Tamou, A., Benzinou, A., and Nasreddine, K. (2022). Targeted Data Augmentation and Hierarchical Classification with Deep Learning for Fish Species Identification in Underwater Images. J. Imaging, 8.10.3390/jimaging8080214 ↗
31. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L. (2009, January 20–25). ImageNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Image Database. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, FL, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ↗
32. A Review of the Use of Convolutional Neural Networks in Agriculture10.1017/S0021859618000436 ↗
33. Alfarhood, S., Alrayeh, A., Safran, M., Alfarhood, M., and Che, D. (2023). Image-Based Arabian Camel Breed Classification Using Transfer Learning on CNNs. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13148192 ↗
34. (2024, April 26). TensorFlow Hub. Available online: https://www.tensorflow.org/hub.
35. Hinton, G.E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov, R.R. (2012). Improving Neural Networks by Preventing Co-Adaptation of Feature Detectors. arXiv.
36. Precision–Recall Curve (PRC) Classification Trees10.1007/s12065-021-00565-2 ↗
37. Comparative Analysis Using Various Performance Metrics in Imbalanced Data for Multi-Class Text Classification
38. Deep Learning Application in Plant Stress Imaging: A Review10.3390/agriengineering2030029 ↗
39. Zubler, A.V., and Yoon, J.-Y. (2020). Proximal Methods for Plant Stress Detection Using Optical Sensors and Machine Learning. Biosensors, 10.10.3390/bios10120193 ↗