Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Fault Reactivation Induced by Water Injection
Source abstract
Abstract
An understanding of fault reactivation induced by water injection is of great significance for geothermal energy development and utilization. We conducted a series of water injection shear tests on low-permeability granite samples that each contained a single saw-cut fault under locally undrained conditions. Slip characteristics were analyzed by varying the fluid pressurization rate, confining pressure, and stress state of the fault to understand fault reactivation. The experimental results demonstrated that at a high pressurization rate, a higher local fluid pressure was needed to reactivate the fault than had been estimated theoretically, and the required fluid pressure increased with an increase in pressurization rate. The fluid pressurization rate and confining pressure both controlled the slip mode of the fault. The slip mode changed from dynamic slip to quasi-static slip at a high pressurization rate, and the peak slip rate of dynamic slip increased with an increasing pressurization rate. The fault showed significant stick-slip characteristics under a high confining pressure, as fault locking and reactivation phenomena occurred repeatedly. Faults with different initial stress states had little influence on the slip mode after the onset of slip.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: earthquake and tectonic studies · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Consumption of energy from conventional sources a challenge to the green environment: Evaluating the role of energy imports, and energy intensity in Australia10.1007/s11356-022-23750-x ↗
2. Progress in exploration, development and utilization of geothermal energy10.3389/feart.2022.911376 ↗
3. Utilization of Geothermal Energy for Sustainable Global Development10.1080/15567240701621158 ↗
4. Geothermal Energy R & D: An Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Geothermal Technologies Office10.1115/1.4049581 ↗
5. HDR/HWR reservoirs: Concepts, understanding and creation10.1016/S0375-6505(99)00045-0 ↗
6. Impact of enhanced geothermal systems on US energy supply in the twenty-first century10.1098/rsta.2006.1964 ↗
7. Fault slip potential induced by fluid injection in the Matouying enhanced geothermal system (EGS) field, Tangshan seismic region, North China10.5194/nhess-22-2257-2022 ↗
8. Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection10.1002/2013JB010597 ↗
9. How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?10.1126/sciadv.1601542 ↗
10. Induced seismicity risk analysis of the 2006 Basel, Switzerland, Enhanced Geothermal System project: Influence of uncertainties on risk mitigation10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.05.007 ↗
11. Assessing whether the 2017 Mw 5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event10.1126/science.aat6081 ↗
12. A note on fault reactivation10.1016/0191-8141(85)90150-6 ↗
13. The role of water lubrication in critical state fault slip10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105606 ↗
14. Shear behaviors of granite fractures immersed in chemical solutions10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105869 ↗
15. Injection-Induced Earthquakes10.1126/science.1225942 ↗
16. Erratum to The 2013–2016 Induced Earthquakes in Harper and Sumner Counties, Southern Kansas10.1785/0120180224 ↗
17. An Investigation of Seismicity Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing in the Sichuan Basin of China Based on Data from a Temporary Seismic Network10.1785/0120180310 ↗
18. A note on induced stress changes in hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirs10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00311-9 ↗
19. The effects of varying injection rates in Osage County, Oklahoma, on the 2016 M w 5.8 Pawnee earthquake10.1785/0220170003 ↗
20. Two-year survey comparing earthquake activity and injection-well locations in the Barnett Shale, Texas10.1073/pnas.1207728109 ↗
21. Induced Seismicity10.1146/annurev-earth-082517-010054 ↗
22. Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection10.1126/science.1255802 ↗
23. Causal mechanism of injection-induced earthquakes through the Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake case study10.1038/s41467-020-16408-0 ↗
24. Aftershock deficiency of induced earthquake sequences during rapid mitigation efforts in Oklahoma10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.036 ↗
25. Characterization of injection-induced seismicity at north central Oklahoma, USA10.1007/s10950-020-09978-5 ↗
26. Stick-slip dynamics of flow-induced seismicity on rate and state faults10.1002/2016GL072045 ↗
27. Delayed Weakening and Reactivation of Rate-and-State Faults Driven by Pressure Changes Due to Fluid Injection10.1029/2019JB018109 ↗
28. Fault valving and pore pressure evolution in simulations of earthquake sequences and aseismic slip10.1038/s41467-020-18598-z ↗
29. Investigations and new insights on earthquake mechanics from fault slip experiments10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104019 ↗
30. Fault Reactivation by Fluid Injection: Controls From Stress State and Injection Rate
31. Heterogeneous fracture slip and aseismic-seismic transition in a triaxial injection test10.1029/2020GL087739 ↗
32. On the effective stress law for rock-on-rock frictional sliding, and fault slip triggered by means of fluid injection10.1098/rsta.2016.0001 ↗
33. Fault Reactivation During Fluid Pressure Oscillations: Transition From Stable to Unstable Slip10.1029/2019JB018517 ↗
34. Mechanical and hydraulic coupling of injection-induced slip along pre-existing fractures10.1016/j.geothermics.2007.11.001 ↗
35. Fault slip controlled by stress path and fluid pressurization rate10.1002/2016GL068893 ↗
36. Stick-Slip as a Mechanism for Earthquakes10.1126/science.153.3739.990 ↗
37. Effect of fluid pressure heterogeneity on injection-induced fracture activation10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103589 ↗
38. On the Relationship Between Fault Permeability Increases, Induced Stress Perturbation, and the Growth of Aseismic Slip During Fluid Injection10.1029/2018GL080233 ↗