A Time–Frequency Image Quality Evaluation Method Based on Improved LIME
Source abstract
Abstract
Deep learning has the characteristics of high efficiency, high accuracy and low knowledge dependence, and has become a hot method in the research field of rotating machinery fault diagnosis. The time–frequency transform can show both the time and frequency characteristics of the vibration signal, so the time–frequency image is often used as the input of deep learning networks. At present, there are many time–frequency transform methods, and how to choose one is a problem worth discussing. This paper proposed a time–frequency image quality evaluation method based on improved local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME). With the input of deep learning networks as the application background, this method evaluates the time–frequency image quality of rotating machinery vibration signals from two aspects: the accuracy of the diagnosis results and the consistency of the interpretation results with prior knowledge. The feasibility of the proposed evaluation method is verified by experiments on the measured data set, and engineers’ trust in the deep learning model is improved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Image and Signal Denoising Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
Funding
anti-wear and anti-fatigue mechanism of aeroengine bearing steels with strength and toughness improved by the synergism of deep cryogenic temperature and ion implantation project
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. From Model, Signal to Knowledge: A Data-Driven Perspective of Fault Detection and Diagnosis10.1109/TII.2013.2243743 ↗
2. Artificial Intelligence for Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery: A Review10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.02.016 ↗
3. Deep Learning and Its Applications to Machine Health Monitoring10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050 ↗
4. A Survey on Deep Learning Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.078 ↗
5. A Review on Data-Driven Fault Severity Assessment in Rolling Bearings10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.012 ↗
6. Shi, L. (2018). The Selection of Neural Network Input Parameters Based on Association Rules, Atlantis Press.10.2991/cmsa-18.2018.72 ↗
7. An End-to-End Adaptive Input Selection with Dynamic Weights for Forecasting Multivariate Time Series10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930069 ↗
8. Neural Network Input Feature Selection Using Structured L2—Norm Penalization
9. Sample Selection via Angular Distance in the Space of the Arguments of an Artificial Neural Network10.1016/j.cageo.2018.02.003 ↗
10. Determining Significance of Input Neurons for Probabilistic Neural Network by Sensitivity Analysis Procedure10.1111/coin.12149 ↗
11. Application of Time-Frequency Analysis in Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis
12. Time–Frequency Feature Representation Using Energy Concentration: An Overview of Recent Advances10.1016/j.dsp.2007.12.004 ↗
13. Recent Advances in Time–Frequency Analysis Methods for Machinery Fault Diagnosis: A Review with Application Examples10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.01.017 ↗
14. Empirical Mode Decomposition and Its Variants: A Review with Applications in Structural Health Monitoring10.1088/1361-665X/aba539 ↗
15. The Empirical Mode Decomposition and the Hilbert Spectrum for Nonlinear and Non-Stationary Time Series Analysis10.1098/rspa.1998.0193 ↗
16. Synchroextracting Transform: The Theory Analysis and Comparisons with the Synchrosqueezing Transform10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107243 ↗
17. Yudkowsky, E. (2008). Global Catastrophic Risks, Oxford University Press.
18. The Role of Trust in Automation Reliance10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00038-7 ↗
19. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., and Riedl, J. (2000, January 1). Explaining Collaborative Filtering Recommendations. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/358916.358995 ↗
20. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13). “Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗
21. Textural Features for Image Classification10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 ↗
22. Synchrosqueezed Wavelet Transforms: An Empirical Mode Decomposition-like Tool10.1016/j.acha.2010.08.002 ↗