A Study on the Results of Risk Analyses Applying the Concept of Rock Mass Stand-Up Time for Underground Mining Sites
Source abstract
Abstract
Throughout all the countries in the world, including Vietnam, nations with well-established mining industries have undertaken extensive research on the stability of rock masses when constructing underground tunnels in varied geological conditions. The present study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the risk assessment related to rock masses during the construction of pit lines in mining operations. Consequently, the standing time of unsupported tunnels is assessed based on different values of the strength index and deformation characteristics of the rock mass. The objective was to perform both experimental and theoretical investigations to analyse how the stand-up time of rock masses surrounding a tunnel affects the unsupported span. The analyses were based on considering the rock parameters, including strain modulus; geological strength index; and allowable displacement values, and consideration of hereditary creep properties. By examining tunnels excavated in rock strata, it was concluded that varying geological strength index values resulted in distinct creep behaviour in the surrounding rock masses. Thus, it was reasonable to compute the unsupported span and stand-up time of tunnels. The research revealed that permissible displacements are significantly influenced by the types of rock materials surrounding the tunnel structure. Recognising the significance of time, the authors introduce a more practical interpretation and evaluation of the stability of rock masses, thus enhancing the precision of commonly available models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Underground Construction and Mining, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
Internal Combustion Engine Department, Le Quy Don Technical University, Hanoi 11917, Vietnam
Soil Mechanics and Geotechnics Department, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Moscow 129337, Russia
Institute of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
Funding
Vietnamese Ministry of Education and Training
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Gebirgsklassifizierung fur den stol lenbau
2. Martyn, J. (1678). Lectures De Potentia Restitutiva, or of Spring Explaining the Power of Springing Bodies, Royal Society.
3. Analytical solution for estimating the stand-up time of the rock mass surrounding tunnel10.1016/j.tust.2014.12.003 ↗
4. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1993). Chapter 22 in Comprehensive Rock Engineering, Elsevier.
5. Myer, L.R., Brekke, T.L., Korbin, G.E., Kavazanjian, E., and Mitchell, J.K. (1977). Stand-Up Time of Tunnels in Squeezing Ground, Department of Transportation. Part i. A Physical Model Study. DOT-TST-77/59 Final Rpt.
6. Evidence for a long-term strength threshold in crystalline rock10.1007/s00603-010-0090-9 ↗
7. Eberhardt, E., Stimpson, B., and Stead, D. (1999, January 25–28). The influence of mineralogy on the initiation of microfractures in Granite. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Paris, France.
8. Creep and time-dependent damage in argillaceous rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.02.004 ↗
9. Analysis and modelling of longitudinal deformation profiles of tunnels excavated in strain-softening time-dependent rock masses10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103643 ↗
10. Plastic radii and longitudinal deformation profiles of tunnels excavated in strain-softening rock masses10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.017 ↗
11. Dilation in granite during servo-controlled triaxial strength tests10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.02.007 ↗
12. Numerical solutions for tunnels excavated in strain-softening rock masses considering a combined support system10.1016/j.apm.2020.11.042 ↗
13. Paraskevopoulou, C. (2016). Time-Dependency of Rocks and Implications Associated with Tunnelling. [Ph.D. Thesis, Queen’s University].
14. Analysis of time-dependent deformation in tunnels using the Convergence-Confinement Method10.1016/j.tust.2017.07.001 ↗
15. Analytically-based simplified formulas for circular tunnels with two liners in viscoelastic rock under anisotropic initial stresses10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.079 ↗
16. Analytical solutions for lined circular tunnels in viscoelastic rock considering various interface conditions10.1016/j.apm.2017.10.031 ↗
17. Coupled analytical solutions for deep-buried circular lined tunnels considering tunnel face advancement and soft rock rheology effects10.1016/j.tust.2019.103111 ↗
18. An analytical solution for time-dependent displacements in a circular tunnel10.1016/0148-9062(87)90523-7 ↗
19. Visco-plastic behaviour around advancing tunnels in squeezing rock10.1007/s00603-007-0137-8 ↗
20. Bobrowsky, P.T., and Marker, B. (2018). Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-73568-9 ↗
21. Creep of rocks10.1086/624775 ↗
22. Creep in rock salt10.1086/627078 ↗
23. Langer, M. (1984, January 9–11). The rheological behaviour of rock salt. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Mechanical Behaviour of of Salt, University Park, PA, USA.
24. Presenting an experimental creep model for rock salt
25. The three stages of stress relaxation-Observations for the time-dependent behaviour of brittle rocks based on laboratory testing10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.11.010 ↗
26. Barla, G., and Borgna, S. (1999, January 6–9). Tunnelling in squeezing rock conditions. Proceedings of the ROCKSITE-99, Bangalore, India.
27. Zheng, X., Wu, K., Shao, Z., Yuan, B., and Zhao, N. (2022). Tunnel Squeezing Deformation Control and the Use of Yielding Elements in Shotcrete Linings A Review. Material, 15.10.3390/ma15010391 ↗
28. Terzaghi, K. (1946). Rock Defects and Loads on Tunnel Supports, Harvard University.
29. Volterra, V. (1931). Theory of Functionals and of Integro-Differential Equations, Blackie.
30. Bulychev, N.S. (1982). Mechanics of Underground Structures, Nedra.
31. Analysis of embedded retaining wall using the subgrade reaction method10.1515/sgem-2015-0008 ↗
32. Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.06.005 ↗
33. Kawalec, J., Grygierek, M., Koda, E., and Osinski, P. (2019). Lessons learned on geosynthetics applications in road structures in Silesia mining region in Poland. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061122 ↗
34. Engineering classification of jointed rock masses
35. Barton, N.R., and Bieniawski, Z.T. (2008). RMR and Q-Setting Records Straight, Progressive Media Markets Ltd.. Tunnels & Tunnelling International.
36. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support10.1007/BF01239496 ↗
37. Practical estimates of rock mass strength10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80069-X ↗
38. Evaluation method for potential rockburst in underground engineering
39. Strength of rock and rock masses
40. Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition
41. Generalized crack initiation and crack damage stress thresholds of brittle rock masses near underground excavations10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.02.001 ↗
42. Modifications to the geological strength index GSI and their applicability to stability of slopes10.1016/S0148-9062(99)00043-1 ↗
43. Singh, B., and Goel, R.K. (1999). Engineering Rock Mass Classification, Elsevier.
44. Lee, Y.-L., Ma, C.-H., and Lee, C.-M. (Civ. Eng., 2023). Analytical Solution Implemented by an Incremental Procedure for the Ground Reaction Based on Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion in the Tunnel Convergence-Confinement Method, Civ. Eng., in print.10.20944/preprints202307.0209.v1 ↗
45. Predicting the deformation moduli of rock masses10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00062-5 ↗
46. Deere, D.U., Hendron, A.J., Patton, F.D., and Cording, E.J. (1966;, January 25–28). Design of surface and near-surface construction in rock. Proceedings of the ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
47. Rock Mass Classification Techniques and Parameters a Review
48. Research in Ground Support and Its Evaluation for Coordination with System Analysis in Rapid Excavation
49. Continuous functions and a computer application for Rock Mass Rating10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104280 ↗
50. Aygar, E.B. (2023). Performance of the Flexible and Rigid Lining under Earthquake Impact and Weakness of the New Austrian Tunneling Method NATM Principles, a Specific Case Study of the Bolu Tunnel. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152115544 ↗
51. Özkan, İ. (1995). Modified Rock Mass Rating M-RMR System and Roof Behavior Model. [Ph.D. Thesis, Middle East Technical University].
52. Franklin, J.A. (1975, January 2–4). Safety and economy in tunneling. Proceedings of the 10th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Kingston, ON, Canada.
53. International society for rock mechanics commission on standardization of laboratory and field tests Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses10.1016/0148-9062(78)91472-9 ↗
54. FEM-analysis of Rock Mechanical Problems with JOBFEM
55. Unified rock classification system
56. Singh, R.N., Elmherig, A.M., and Sunu, M.Z. (1986, January 28–30). Application of rock mass characterization to the stability assessment and blast design in hard rock surface mining excavations. Proceedings of the ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
57. The Rock Mass index RMÐ applied in rock mechanics and rock engineering
58. Empirical methods of calculating the mechanical parameters of the rock mass
59. Estimating the rock mass deformation modulus A comparative study of empirical methods based on 48 rock mass scenarios10.1590/0370-44672019740150 ↗